Another mass shooting, biggest death toll in US History - Page 16

maskedmelon · #**151** 06-13-2016, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh the gay gene thing? People need to keep up with the news. Just stick 'no gay gene' into google, you'll get the 2014-2015 reports. They still hunting for it.

As for the witnesses, should have been more than two, and that one guy was just guessing. Even infowars had nothing conclusive. Not saying it wasn't, but at the same time it still could have been a false flag as he suggests, but as a joint opperation if that were the case. That seems to be the way things go when it is the case.

Oh and the other witness, she didn't see skin color.

No ^^ I was laughing more at the magnanimous portrayal of Islam and suggestion that it is treated unfairly by the media.

Whether there is a gay gene or not though, desire is inborn. You can choose whether or not to act on desire, but you do not choose what you desire. Being gay is not a matter of choice.

Blitzers · #**152** 06-13-2016, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The dude that invented islam (from moon god worship - hybrid), what he wrote, his new "religion" failed, it wasn't aggressive enough. So he tacked on the second section, in which it promoted this aggression (war ideology etc.), and in turn over-ruling the first section.

This aggression drove this "religion" forward. Liberal muslims follow the failed "religion" (and in confusion), while the rest follow it's true intent as it was completed. Most of the muslim on muslim warring is over views of eschatology (end-times predictions).

Muhammad never wrote shit, if you research how the Quran was assembled, it's a complete joke. Some Caliph came up with some bullshit rules and anyone who wanted to add to the 1st compilation could as long as he had one witness to the "revelation."

Pretty sure Muhammad even opposed a written Quran, he advocated memorization and recitation, I'd have to go back and look it up again but it's a real hoot.

Alarti0001 · #**153** 06-13-2016, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can't stop anger either way. In English cities (usually non-white) kids just stab each other because guns are hard to come by.

It's alot harder to kill 50 people in minutes with a knife.

Daywolf · #**154** 06-13-2016, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No ^^ I was laughing more at the magnanimous portrayal of Islam and suggestion that it is treated unfairly by the media.

Whether there is a gay gene or not though, desire is inborn. You can choose whether or not to act on desire, but you do not choose what you desire. Being gay is not a matter of choice.

Ah. As for desire, it's a hardwired biological thing for the most part, it would need a gene. It's not very Freudian of me, I know, but there is a good reason why they look for such a gene. I tend to agree more with Carl Jung, anyway, being environment has a large impact.

**Rogean** · #**155** 06-13-2016, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Clubs are gun-free zones. Including the workers.

No club security is allowed to carry. No patrons are allowed to carry. Its for safety reasons.

This goes for 99% of clubs in the United States.

Not really. I've been to plenty of clubs that don't pat you down. While almost every state has some sort of law that prohibits carrying while drinking, not all of them prohibit carrying into establishments that serve alcohol.

So if this were Massachusetts, for example, I could legally carry into any club that isn't patting people down. Would I? No, because chances are that I would be drinking, which IS against the law to carry while doing. This is usually the case for most club goers, and why there was nobody there to shoot back.

Also, all of this aside, there WAS a police officer on duty at the club. He couldn't stop the shooter.

**Rogean** · #**156** 06-13-2016, 10:49 AM

What I'm really curious is how many of those people inside the club had what would normally be a survivable gun shot wound, but simply bled out because of a 3 fucking hour standoff.

The law makers want to keep saying over and over, give up your guns, let the police handle it. No, they'll just sit outside for 3 hours while everyone bleeds out. Or in San Bernardino where they respond in a record 4 minutes yet 36 people are still shot and the shooters get away.

Daywolf · #**157** 06-13-2016, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Muhammad never wrote shit, if you research how the Quran was assembled, it's a complete joke. Some Caliph came up with some bullshit rules and anyone who wanted to add to the 1st compilation could as long as he had one witness to the "revelation."

Pretty sure Muhammad even opposed a written Quran, he advocated memorization and recitation, I'd have to go back and look it up again but it's a real hoot.

well it says he wrote it. He could have dictated if he were illiterate. But moon god worship, check, and a revision after the first failure, double check.

Alarti0001 · #**158** 06-13-2016, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What I'm really curious is how many of those people inside the club had what would normally be a survivable gun shot wound, but simply bled out because of a 3 fucking hour standoff.

The law makers want to keep saying over and over, give up your guns, let the police handle it. No, they'll just sit outside for 3 hours while everyone bleeds out. Or in San Bernardino where they respond in a record 4 minutes yet 36 people are still shot and the shooters get away.

Whats the alternative?

Tenlaar · #**159** 06-13-2016, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Straight couples know better than to kiss on the mouth in the public street.

Well this clears things up a bit. I might be an angry person if women were embarrassed to kiss me in public too.

Daywolf · #**160** 06-13-2016, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's alot harder to kill 50 people in minutes with a knife.

Yet the weak have a better chance of actually defending themselves with a firearm, not a knife. This is a deterent, that anyone in the room could possibly be able to stop them, not just the one mean looking guy in the room they would just get the backstab on first.

So the deterent is that anyone could defend themselves, so go find a room with less risk. It's only liberal/progressive thinking that a good show of surrender is somehow the best deterent. And even then, it's everyone else dissarms but the liberal. Like Hillary yipes about guns, but heavily surrounds herself with them.