extremist muslims get lit up in texas

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[CITATION NEEDED]

I'm sorry... Are you actually arguing that the Stop Islamization of America event was not defended with guns?

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm sorry... Are you actually arguing that the Stop Islamization of America event was not defended with guns?

you equate defense and murder

[Samoht]

I'm pretty sure that right now neither one of us knows what you're talking about.

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm pretty sure that right now neither one of us knows what you're talking about.

you made this post stating that would-be murderer fanatics are both parties in this Texas shooting:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"gun toting, violent, would be murderer" extremists are actually on *both* sides of this situation

i challenged it with the following:

Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[CITATION NEEDED]

your citation? to equate defense with murder:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm sorry... Are you actually arguing that the Stop Islamization of America event was not defended with guns?

Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you equate defense and murder

hope this helps friend

[Samoht]

So let me get this straight... You're not actually addressing the content of my post; you're just objecting to the use of a single word - a word that was clearly a quote of someone else's post, and used in the same manner in that post (manner being no parties have actually been proven to have committed murder), but you're only objecting to my use of the word and not theirs? Oh, ok.

[Champion_Standing]

Fucking nerds

[Rararboker]

Lol guy doesn't realize what a joke he is.

This is great.

[Samaritan]

Originally Posted by Saludeen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I support freedom of speech, but what if you tore up American flags and hung them on your porch with cartoons mocking the troops? Do you think your house would get vandalized? The people who draw Muhammad do it just to make Muslims angry. Neither of those examples justify violent retaliation, but it would be naive not to expect it.

Perhaps.

But it would also be naïve for the person who chose to vandalize to not expect an appropriate level of response / punishment for their actions if and/or when they were caught.

[andrew23]

^ what he said, if vandalism was the response than those individuals would be handled within the boundaries and rules of that offense. But sadly they chose to bring weapons and attempt a homicide. Which puts our LEOs in the position to use lethal force. I'm not sure what your argument is. Did they think it would stir the pot when they hosted the event , probably. Does that justify attempted homicide? The real losers in this situation are the peaceful Muslims, because it's just another example of violent extremisism to add to the long list.

[andrew23]

Also if you're comparing a peace keeping officer who carries a weapon for the defense of our community, children and loved ones. Than you're an idiot and I hope your family burns in a home invasion/murder/arson to further demonstrate the need for men prepared to do violence on behalf of good people.