Public Raid Petitions: P99 Freedom of Information Act - Page 18

Tasslehofp99 · #**171** 12-25-2014, 02:41 PM

Is there any possibility that public raid petitions will ever be implemented?

bump for Christmas wishes! lol

Making raid petitions public would go a long way towards keeping the raid scene clean and transparent, as there would be no room for the lying and lawyering that we've seen over the past months.

**Alunova** · #**172** 12-25-2014, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1) Petition itself.
2) Defense from accused guild(s). If more than one guild is accused, each guild will now be able to defend itself, provide opposing evidence, etc.
3) Rebuttal from Petitioning guild (maybe put some kind of limit on this? could start with no limit and see what happens, placing a cap if needed)
4) Rebuttal from accused guild(s). Final post(s). The thread would be locked at this point so that only the staff could respond further.

I was just thinking about this before I saw it was already posted. Limiting posts would consolidate the relevant information and could be used to negotiate a solution by admitting a mistake during rebuttal instead of hanging on to straws through 100 pages of "evidence".

Would be interesting to see if it improves things. I'll support anything that makes life easier on CS staff.

Frieza_Prexus · #**173** 03-16-2015, 05:54 PM

While there's been a recent staff shakeup, perhaps this is still a good time to open the issue.

Public petitions with established rules will only serve to reduce the workload on the now reduced staff, and can only help in creating a fair and equitable environment.

Lisset · #**174** 03-17-2015, 12:11 PM

Go away thread necro.

Frieza_Prexus · #**175** 03-17-2015, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lisset [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Go away thread necro.

No.

I believe this is an important topic that would do nothing but benefit the server.

knix · #**176** 04-01-2015, 09:44 AM

arsenalpow · #**177** 04-01-2015, 10:27 AM

I don't think its a good idea. It will turn every raid petition into RnF fodder / a popularity contest. I just want consistent rulings and complete transparency isn't exactly necessary for that.

portbitch69 · #**178** 04-01-2015, 01:08 PM

this is classic everquest not law class

portbitch69 · #**179** 04-01-2015, 01:09 PM

i just dont see them implementing another system to an already implemented raid system to try and fix years of stale content. just let them keep working on velious and if that doesnt fix problems then come back to this

Ele · #**180** 04-01-2015, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by portbitch69 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i just dont see them implementing another system to an already implemented raid system to try and fix years of stale content. just let them keep working on velious and if that doesnt fix problems then come back to this

GMs != Devs.

Quote:

this is classic everquest not law class

The GMs allow guild reps to put on their Perry Mason seersucker suits and solicit the "court" for hours each weeks via the forums, game chat, Twitch streaming, text messages, phone calls, and Skype to resolve the "disputes" known only to them.

Then on top of that, they can even trade petitions and rules infractions like carbon credits to wash out penalties.