![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
Doesn't matter what the screenshots said. Pretty sure Exe axe was always a proc. Things didn't used to say combat anyways.
example: [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Is this worn dismiss undead? :P If you can find evidence, we will change it if its not correct. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
Its like ... So simple its comfusing me..
I understand. Im not sure the others do. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
Ya they didn't specify anything which is why I've been having trouble finding any concrete info, I'll keep looking though.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
It seems like I remember this thing being worn haste back in the day, but I could be wrong. All of the 2001 (oldest posts around the boards I could find) talks about a patched version and that its a proc, not worn. Guess we have to go by our oldest sources.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
I had one. The effect was a combat proc, not a worn effect. People on Alla's, as usual, are probably just spewing garbage about things they don't understand. There's a lot of incorrect information there in the comments. Take it with a grain of salt. This would have been after Brell Serelis had opened, but even if the Axe had a worn effect at launch time, we would be way beyond that point now in the progression.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Dantes Infernus
57th Level Champion of Rallos Zek "Life's short and hard like a body building elf." | ||
|
Last edited by Dantes; 11-12-2010 at 07:27 PM..
|
|
||
![]() |
|
|