Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #311  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:18 PM
Estolcles Estolcles is offline
Sarnak

Estolcles's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: In front of a wrestling arena
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have 13 total raid related petitions.... you really shouldnt make claims I can easily... prove.
Elipses prove guilt.
__________________
Estolcles Guerrero: Human Paladin <Europa>
Kalila Hart: Human Druid <Europa>
Lemmi Kilmaster: Halfling Warrior <Europa>
Wolfang: Human Monk

Estolcles: Human Paladin
*Thread postings and responses are 99.9999% of the time not representing the thoughts and beliefs of Europa, including any/all of it's members and officers.

"You chicken chokin' pecker puke!" ~Terry Funk
  #312  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:19 PM
Ravager Ravager is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We might have allowed someone else to loot the item.. however anthrax took that choice from us. We often open up loot to whomever is in zone. Sorry buddy the facts don't support your statement.
In those days you opened it up to whomever had 250k to spend on rots. Not arguing about the ninja looting, though the version of events I always heard was Anthrax was baited into looting it.
  #313  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:20 PM
Rais Rais is offline
Fire Giant

Rais's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 743
Default

So you made 13 shitty raid petitions your own guild leader didn't want you to make and finally forced you to quit after the staff told him to. This isn't including in game petitions either.

Thank you for proving me correct.
  #314  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:20 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In those days you opened it up to whomever had 250k to spend on rots. Not arguing about the ninja looting, though the version of events I always heard was Anthrax was baited into looting it.
Would love to see this transcript. Little chance that happened but I would love to see Anthrax's defense.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #315  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:21 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rais [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So you made 13 shitty raid petitions your own guild leader didn't want you to make and finally forced you to quit after the staff told him to. This isn't including in game petitions either.

Thank you for proving me correct.
Except 13 isn't anywhere close to "more than anyone else" and most of those were at his express instruction... since he was busy with other things, and I had a fairly high success rate.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #316  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:22 PM
drdrakes drdrakes is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 357
Default

Where else are ~7 people arguing this passionately about something that means so little? This shit is amazing, I bet you are all >25 too.
  #317  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:23 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drdrakes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Where else are ~7 people arguing this passionately about something that means so little? This shit is amazing, I bet you are all >25 too.
Passion dies at 25? Your love life must be very boring.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #318  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:24 PM
Rais Rais is offline
Fire Giant

Rais's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 743
Default

It's people bored doing work or homework bro. Not many people really take this serious.
  #319  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:24 PM
Rattle Squirrell Rattle Squirrell is offline
Kobold

Rattle Squirrell's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 124
Default

This is moderately entertaining to see a bunch of neck-beards fighting over "raid rules".

bahaha
  #320  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:25 PM
Troubled Troubled is offline
Sarnak

Troubled's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssfarmer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
/sigh

what i dont understand is that IB trains TMO @ naggy and causes wipe..... which causes tmo's aggro to transfer and pull naggy out of lair.... tmo conceded because this is against the rules on our part - imo issue solved ib gets an uncontested naggy

again at trak tmo engages too soon, tmo makes no other attempt other than CRing (even CR and buffed some taken who died when the repop happened) and was almost compeltey full buffed and more than ready to engage a 2nd time before ib goes in..... yet tmo stays back conceding mob (was an argument about this i will say, but no attempt to pull was made) again, ib gets uncontested trakanon while TMO CRs itself + taken people- issue should be resolved

IB has a history of having mobs conceded to them and then bitching to staff about the issue getting 2x the rewards, yet when they are in the wrong they wont do the same thing.... we all thought that arguments were supposed to be worked out between guilds first and tmo is willing but ib wont, i mean just look at them training hoshkar on tmo causing a wipe and then going and killing the mob themselves this past week + dropping hoshkar into our pull (as lazie has shown they used this as a defense to cause a suspension against tmo) yet think its perfectly fine.

To derubael's post:

how bout that rule being posted? why are none of the rulings EVER posted..... are we supposed to just remember every single ruling ever handed down? and why has this never been enforced? its been done on both sides plenty of times since you become a guide and NO punishment has EVER come from it.... i mean i have plenty of fraps of IB doing while i was raiding with them, and its happened a few times since i've been with tmo.... this has NEVER resulted in a punishment.

Can we please at least be consistent with rulings? instead of one week it be one thing and the next week it be something else? this has been an issue for as long as i've raided..... just clearly define situations and make a FAQ and put in raid discussion as a sticky then at least its posted (and this can be updated with each new ruling if something isnt clear about previous rulings) this might have an upfront time cost (minimal considering the time you already spend on things) and should save you plenty in the long run.... and it should stop most arguments
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLL
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.