Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: Would you donate for a new "rotation" blue server?
Yes, I would absolutely donate money for this 256 62.75%
No, I'm quite happy with the way things are 87 21.32%
Don't care one way or another 65 15.93%
Voters: 408. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:02 PM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by webrunner5 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hell I am not knocking the Devs, they do a lot more than we think, but Velious is not even out or the purported "Teams Server" and you really think they are going to start ANOTHER server??? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well there's speculation about what'll happen with Teams after it launches. It's always been stated that they'll merge red into teams (later on) or merge teams into red if it's not a success.

What would happen to that extra server I wonder? Might be the same server as Velious beta if we're honest. But long term it shouldn't be wasted [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
  #52  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:03 PM
Raev Raev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the "pay2win" sentiment is that you're offering up money to transfer to a server where acquisition of pixels will be faster/easier.
See, all of these Class C style arguments make sense until you realize that our endgame isn't classic (variance).
  #53  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:06 PM
Snizatcher Snizatcher is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 60
Default

Just throw the tag "Hardcore" on the Class C's server so they can all pat each other on the back and put "Hardcore" on their forum signatures. That should make everyone happy.
__________________
BSharp
<Bregan D'Aerth>
  #54  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:07 PM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
See, all of these Class C style arguments make sense until you realize that our endgame isn't classic (variance).
Without variance though it's even more of an FTE fest.

"Same time next week guys?"
"See you there"
__________________
  #55  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:07 PM
Troubled Troubled is offline
Sarnak

Troubled's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 461
Default

No bush towers option. Voted next closest thing.
__________________
  #56  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:08 PM
falkun falkun is offline
Planar Protector

falkun's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ruins of Old Sebilis
Posts: 2,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Without variance though it's even more of an FTE fest.

"Same time next week guys?"
"See you there"
And variance fits perfectly with the race that class-C wants. If/when everything is on a strict rotation, there's no need for variance.
  #57  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:11 PM
Raev Raev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Without variance though it's even more of an FTE fest.
I am not saying 0 variance would be better; I'm saying that all this pay2win garbage is just that, garbage. Project 2000 would be much more classic.

Anyway, it's not going to happen.
  #58  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:15 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the "pay2win" sentiment is that you're offering up money to transfer to a server where acquisition of pixels will be faster/easier.
This. I am not trying to make it sound evil. Pay2win is viable on modern MMO's. A level playing field is something with rules that are easily applicable that all types of players can participate in whether it be casual or hardcore. What you are proposing to have caters to one type of player and you are saying you will pay to have it.

We need to work on the issues with this raid scene with common sense and make concrete rules that are easily understandable with very little gray area....To have a level playing field.
  #59  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:16 PM
hightower187 hightower187 is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man0warr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The Rathe had a full rotation, it's not un classic.
This is true. My guild Noble Blade shared rotations with all the other guilds on the server. Never was a problem.
  #60  
Old 11-12-2014, 02:17 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am not saying 0 variance would be better; I'm saying that all this pay2win garbage is just that, garbage. Project 2000 would be much more classic.

Anyway, it's not going to happen.
Me and Loraen rarely agree. I wouldn't say 0 variance. Lower it enough to keep the race start time random, but not burn folks out. Limit the amount of people a guild wanting to compete for the mob can have in zone.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.