![]() |
|
#61
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#63
|
|||
|
In a shocking development Wipe It Clean voted yes.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#64
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#65
|
|||
|
i dont get why gms and devs are SO vocal about not wiping it instead of thinking about it since in a server where we barely have 150 online at peak times ( yes there is less people than the number shown on server list ) having 171 to vote yes and 49 to vote no is A LOT.
For those who say theyll quit etc, we only have THIS red server, im sure those 49 aint going anywhere. Again i would like to know the real reason gms are so vocal against a wipe when community wants it. Fear of blue players asking for the same? dont want to set a precedent? i dont think ull get a 80% vote pool on blue about a wipe anyway, u CANT act like this on a democratic world pals. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#66
|
|||
|
also 2+ years of kunark is not classic, also not logical. Common sense would have wiped it in cycles.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#67
|
||||
|
Quote:
I never expected that community support for a wipe would actually lead to one... I was just fascinated at the overwhelming (nearly 80%) response in favor of it. Disbanding Nilly came two years too late to make much of a difference, but at least it makes things more interesting until teams (hopefully) becomes a reality. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|