Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 08-18-2014, 12:46 PM
thugcruncher thugcruncher is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Highkeep
Posts: 450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I looked at the last page, saw people quoting tranny porn, and nuked the whole thing.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #62  
Old 08-18-2014, 12:50 PM
Mac Drettj Mac Drettj is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i did, but now everyone can, forever

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Andis #1 no vote
  #63  
Old 08-18-2014, 02:14 PM
Kergan Kergan is offline
Planar Protector

Kergan's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,052
Default

In a shocking development Wipe It Clean voted yes.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archalen View Post
Next thing I know he's low-HP running like a NPC but we blasted him down so hard I think his pussy came off.
  #64  
Old 08-24-2014, 10:54 PM
Aenor Aenor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i did, but now everyone can, forever

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sirken is the fucking man. So... how many of the 49 virgins ate a ban?
  #65  
Old 08-25-2014, 05:28 AM
DRAGONBAIT DRAGONBAIT is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 830
Default

i dont get why gms and devs are SO vocal about not wiping it instead of thinking about it since in a server where we barely have 150 online at peak times ( yes there is less people than the number shown on server list ) having 171 to vote yes and 49 to vote no is A LOT.
For those who say theyll quit etc, we only have THIS red server, im sure those 49 aint going anywhere. Again i would like to know the real reason gms are so vocal against a wipe when community wants it. Fear of blue players asking for the same? dont want to set a precedent? i dont think ull get a 80% vote pool on blue about a wipe anyway, u CANT act like this on a democratic world pals.
  #66  
Old 08-25-2014, 05:31 AM
DRAGONBAIT DRAGONBAIT is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 830
Default

also 2+ years of kunark is not classic, also not logical. Common sense would have wiped it in cycles.
  #67  
Old 08-25-2014, 05:35 AM
Aenor Aenor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRAGONBAIT [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
u CANT act like this on a democratic world pals.
Democracy is a fairy tale. All hail supreme dictator Rogean!

I never expected that community support for a wipe would actually lead to one... I was just fascinated at the overwhelming (nearly 80%) response in favor of it. Disbanding Nilly came two years too late to make much of a difference, but at least it makes things more interesting until teams (hopefully) becomes a reality.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.