The Left Goblin Ear Problem

[Champion_Standing]

Originally Posted by dustysr06 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On red, that camp is open.

FTFY

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by dustysr06 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On red, you'd just call your homies and take that mothafukka's camp.

try it, you might like it.

I was unaware this was an option on red.

[Temig]

Going to jump on this thread with a similar situation and see if this was handled properly:

Location: Unrest
Situation: Group camping MR. Another group set up at back door. MR group has been there for awhile and has been clearing basically the entire first floor before anything re-pops. When back door group shows up, MR group leaves that room and the back hall spawns alone. Eventually the back group starts running around the front of the house looking for spawns (going through all the side rooms) and eventually grabs one and brings it back to their camp. I've been pulling for MR and see it so I whisper the puller and ask that they keep to the back since we're camping the mobs and get a reply along the lines of "If there are mobs up because you can't keep up with the spawns, I'm going to pull them." I replied stating that we were, indeed, keeping up with the spawns as evidenced by the fact that they needed to run around and do 3 laps through the side rooms just to find that one mob that had just spawned. There were a few other messages including their puller's belief that MR meant just MR (the 3 spawn points) and I replied stating that I'd simply never seen the side-rooms as contested spawns so long as the group was keeping them all cleared. In the end, the back group apparently decided to just keep killing the spawns at the rear of the house and my group continued to kill what we had been. I still feel like my take on the situation was perfectly reasonable, but upon reading this thread I'm not 100% sure. We handled the situation without any CSR intervention, which is good, but for future reference, what would the official policy be on something like this in terms of defining these camps? (I'd try to draw my own conclusions based on what was stated regarding HHK but I've never done the camp there so I have no idea how (dis)similar it is to my scenario.)

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Temig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Going to jump on this thread with a similar situation and see if this was handled properly:

Location: Unrest
Situation: Group camping MR. Another group set up at back door. MR group has been there for awhile and has been clearing basically the entire first floor before anything re-pops. When back door group shows up, MR group leaves that room and the back hall spawns alone. Eventually the back group starts running around the front of the house looking for spawns (going through all the side rooms) and eventually grabs one and brings it back to their camp. I've been pulling for MR and see it so I whisper the puller and ask that they keep to the back since we're camping the mobs and get a reply along the lines of "If there are mobs up because you can't keep up with the spawns, I'm going to pull them." I replied stating that we were, indeed, keeping up with the spawns as evidenced by the fact that they needed to run around and do 3 laps through the side rooms just to find that one mob that had just spawned. There were a few other messages including their puller's belief that MR meant just MR (the 3 spawn points) and I replied stating that I'd simply never seen the side-rooms as contested spawns so long as the group was keeping them all cleared. In the end, the back group apparently decided to just keep killing the spawns at the rear of the house and my group continued to kill what we had been. I still feel like my take on the situation was perfectly reasonable, but upon reading this thread I'm not 100% sure. We handled the situation without any CSR intervention, which is good, but for future reference, what would the official policy be on something like this in terms of defining these camps? (I'd try to draw my own conclusions based on what was stated regarding HHK but I've never done the camp there so I have no idea how (dis)similar it is to my scenario.)

Regardless of whether he felt that it was all one camp or not, the point is that we gladly gave up the back room per PnP camping policy. We weren't under any obligation to give up additional camps to that group.

[Locust]

Originally Posted by ManosMan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know right?

pro cheer leading skills right here. he might let you blow him in the locker room if you keep it up!

[Porz]

Originally Posted by Lictor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do said homies only log in at 4am?

Said homies got that bat phone. Hmu I got you.

[Juryiel]

Originally Posted by Temig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Going to jump on this thread with a similar situation and see if this was handled properly:

Location: Unrest
Situation: Group camping MR. Another group set up at back door. MR group has been there for awhile and has been clearing basically the entire first floor before anything re-pops. When back door group shows up, MR group leaves that room and the back hall spawns alone. Eventually the back group starts running around the front of the house looking for spawns (going through all the side rooms) and eventually grabs one and brings it back to their camp. I've been pulling for MR and see it so I whisper the puller and ask that they keep to the back since we're camping the mobs and get a reply along the lines of "If there are mobs up because you can't keep up with the spawns, I'm going to pull them." I replied stating that we were, indeed, keeping up with the spawns as evidenced by the fact that they needed to run around and do 3 laps through the side rooms just to find that one mob that had just spawned. There were a few other messages including their puller's belief that MR meant just MR (the 3 spawn points) and I replied stating that I'd simply never seen the side-rooms as contested spawns so long as the group was keeping them all cleared. In the end, the back group apparently decided to just keep killing the spawns at the rear of the house and my group continued to kill what we had been. I still feel like my take on the situation was perfectly reasonable, but upon reading this thread I'm not 100% sure. We handled the situation without any CSR intervention, which is good, but for future reference, what would the official policy be on something like this in terms of defining these camps? (I'd try to draw my own conclusions based on what was stated regarding HHK but I've never done the camp there so I have no idea how (dis)similar it is to my scenario.)

I think the fact that you worked it out without CSR is the best way to do it, but technically if you can't see the spawns from your camp they can contest them. Something like that seems to be what is typically enforced.

[no chewie dont]

Have u tried waiting til he pulls then harmtouching him? Thats what I would do, wouldnt have even bothered with a thread

[GinnasP99]

That's so Bregan

[ManosMan]

Originally Posted by Locust [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pro cheer leading skills right here. he might let you blow him in the locker room if you keep it up!

Right because the message was all about cheering on Rando X Person and NOT noting the incredible ridiculousness of your guildie camping a lowbie spot and saying it's no different than if he were a group of people getting exp there. Hurrrrrrrrr....... why do you always look like such an idiot when you try to quote me?