attention RL info posting nerds

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As far as Tiggles goes, you let me know when he gets that character unbanned, k? As you stated yourself, you aren't even working off of facts - you're going off second-hand information and allegations. Again, the server has had a few rough patches with former staff members - but I'd challenge anyone to find real evidence of something like this happening with any current staff members. So yes, if this is the way you feel, I'd say gtfo - I don't know why you'd want to play on a server you view as "corrupt" ran by a staff that you think show favortism.

Shit, let me know too please. Nilbog is my neighbor and the guy won't even lift the ban, even though he borrows my lawnmower and never returns it.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Duckwalk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm joking only to an extent. I think outsourcing investigation duties to certain players with high play times and an vested interest in uncovering RMT violations could be an interesting solution provided they had a limited Dev tool kit and exactly zero ability to affect the game outside of recording logs and developing evidence.

*Disclaimer: I am not a programmer, I have no clue what this would entail. Yes, Derubael i have no clue what im talkig about. You asked for ideas so I'm throwing them out.

This would only serve to increase the theories of server corruption. It would be even more possible to either fabricate logs to get someone banned, or have an RMT kingpin sneak in and undermine the entire process to a larger extent than people already feel they are able to. It also wouldn't increase GM transparency,as everyone seems to be eminently concerned with.

[Duckwalk]

Originally Posted by Fael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The sad thing is you actually believe what you think.

For several months now there has been a long history of forgoing the raid mob that day plus the next one if any type of negligence occurs during an engagement. Your attempt to jam the incident with dinacarl into the scenario provided by ambrotos is glaringly weak seeing as there was no raid encounter to forgo.

Loraens idea that a raid offense is determined by the entity trained not by the identity trainer is also equally devoid of logic, and cannot be found within any concept contrived and recognize by men who make a living making and accepting arguments such as principles of Vicarious liability, agency, or negligent entrustment. Your best bet is under a theory of control via your boy unbrella; but suspicion is not a substitute for evidence.

Thank god none of you are able to sit on a jury .... Wait ... Fuck us all.

Dolic

Curious as to why you think agency wouldn't apply. The master is liable for servants acts within the scope of employment or in the case of intentional torts, when force is used to further the master's business/interests.

Seems like BDA would have an argument atleast.

[Ambrotos]

Sure. Everyone believes you Jeremy. Keep right on.

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by Duckwalk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Curious as to why you think agency wouldn't apply. The master is liable for servants acts within the scope of employment or in the case of intentional torts, when force is used to further the master's business/interests.

Seems like BDA would have an argument atleast.

Because respondeat superior is limited when the agent exceeds the scope of his duties. See Frolic and Detour.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

theres a reason ephi was removed from staff.

because he flagged my account and gave me a bad rep on Stealin.

Let that be a lesson to all you new guys.

[Tiggles]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

because he flagged my account and gave me a bad rep on Stealin.

Let that be a lesson to all you new guys.

Deru said he would unban you if you can have Mazam contact him saying we will take you back into TMO.

[Duckwalk]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This would only serve to increase the theories of server corruption. It would be even more possible to either fabricate logs to get someone banned, or have an RMT kingpin sneak in and undermine the entire process to a larger extent than people already feel they are able to. It also wouldn't increase GM transparency,as everyone seems to be eminently concerned with.

That depends on whether the evidence they developed could be manipulated or not. A system where they were only able to flag questionable content for review might work. Regardless, there appears to already be methods the GMs are willing to accept as proof as we've seen in the recent bannings.

Maybe the GMs would never even act on information developed by young detectives but at the very least it might slow RMTers down with the thought that people who severely dislike them are looking for any slip up.

[Duckwalk]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because respondeat superior is limited when the agent exceeds the scope of his duties. See Frolic and Detour.

Not if its a intentional tort which benefits the master, right?

Sorry, no Lexis access at the moment.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Tiggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Deru said he would unban you if you can have Mazam contact him saying we will take you back into TMO.

Mazam is fine with me, I'm sure he and a few others will vouch for my willingness to raid under the TMO banner on Stealin.