Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 06-06-2014, 05:23 PM
Ravager Ravager is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,731
Default

Nice train TMO.
  #112  
Old 06-06-2014, 05:23 PM
Hastley Hastley is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ezekiel is me you mongo. So your monk and our druid.
you ever had sex bro??
  #113  
Old 06-06-2014, 05:54 PM
Karkona Karkona is offline
Aviak

Karkona's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 74
Default

I am transferring this portion from the raid discussion post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The initial petition was posted on Monday night and responded to by Sirken on Tuesday. To quote Sirken “I got as far as Chest saying two months. Try to work it out like reasonable human beings.”
This disturbs me. TMO gets a free pass to train? The fraps was clear as all get-out. I get that Sirken and Chest don't get along but damn, is it so bad that guilds get free passes to train on BDA now because folks don't see eye-to-eye?
  #114  
Old 06-06-2014, 06:01 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karkona [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am transferring this portion from the raid discussion post.



This disturbs me. TMO gets a free pass to train? The fraps was clear as all get-out. I get that Sirken and Chest don't get along but damn, is it so bad that guilds get free passes to train on BDA now because folks don't see eye-to-eye?

I think what Sirken is telling Chest is be more reasonable in negotiations. Chest has this history of being a ragehard and not being reasonable. He was doing the same thing over this and not reasonably trying to come to a compromise over the situation. He threw out terms no one would accept for one player doing something on his own. All the GMs are asking is that we reasonably work together to resolve these issues. Chest can't seem to grasp the term reasonable.

I mean this is evident by him coming into a zone 19 minutes after another group and monopolizing the zone even when people try to compromise with him. Him being an Officer of the people he was leading while doing that makes it even worse sadly.
  #115  
Old 06-06-2014, 06:02 PM
Funkutron5000 Funkutron5000 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karkona [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am transferring this portion from the raid discussion post.



This disturbs me. TMO gets a free pass to train? The fraps was clear as all get-out. I get that Sirken and Chest don't get along but damn, is it so bad that guilds get free passes to train on BDA now because folks don't see eye-to-eye?
I think it's more that Sirken felt a 2 month raid suspension was an absurd request for this incident, not that he felt that what happened was acceptable.
__________________
Corova Moloko, Crusader and Guild Leader of The Mystical Order
  #116  
Old 06-06-2014, 06:06 PM
Antarctica Antarctica is offline
Decaying Skeleton

Antarctica's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think what Sirken is telling Chest is be more reasonable in negotiations. Chest has this history of being a ragehard and not being reasonable. He was doing the same thing over this and not reasonably trying to come to a compromise over the situation. He threw out terms no one would accept for one player doing something on his own. All the GMs are asking is that we reasonably work together to resolve these issues. Chest can't seem to grasp the term reasonable.

I mean this is evident by him coming into a zone 19 minutes after another group and monopolizing the zone even when people try to compromise with him. Him being an Officer of the people he was leading while doing that makes it even worse sadly.
I don't understand how BDA can be labeled "monopolizers" in a zoned with as many mobs as it has when when BDA was on the other size of the zone.

Sugar coat it any way you want, training is illegal. Period. Deal with the monk as appropriate.
  #117  
Old 06-06-2014, 06:10 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antarctica [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't understand how BDA can be labeled "monopolizers" in a zoned with as many mobs as it has when when BDA was on the other size of the zone.

Sugar coat it any way you want, training is illegal. Period. Deal with the monk as appropriate.
You simply can't monopolize all the spawns of the zone when there is more than one group of people in the zone that sir is the rules. This is also a rule on the server.

The player holding multiple 'camps' retains the right to choose which 'camp' to give up.

BDA needed to communicate and compromise in this situation and the officer that was contacted about it told people to "Fuck off".
  #118  
Old 06-06-2014, 06:10 PM
Man0warr Man0warr is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,734
Default

I'm with Xasten on this - Dinacarl should be removed from TMO and suspended for training.

If TMO doesn't remove Dinacarl, then they are condoning his actions, and should thus be suspended a long with him.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will>
Manowarr - Druid

Blue
Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA>
Shiroe - 60 Enchanter
Manowarr - 60 Druid
  #119  
Old 06-06-2014, 06:11 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man0warr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm with Xasten on this - Dinacarl should be removed from TMO and suspended for training.

If TMO doesn't remove Dinacarl, then they are condoning his actions, and should thus be suspended a long with him.
Already been done. You should read Unbrella's last post in the raid discussion.
  #120  
Old 06-06-2014, 06:15 PM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default

The precedent to work off of would probably be the Yibz incident, which was deemed an accidental trained and yielded a 1 day suspension(during sim repop) for tmo and a 2 week suspension(?) for Yibz. You could deduce from that, that an intentional train would likely yield something similar/a little more drastic than that.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.