Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:13 PM
cams cams is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There really isn't anybody else to blame for what happened other than IB. Plenty of people had Nobles sniped by TMO (their participation in a YNYD agreement varied depending on how many nobles were actually spawning per week) and nobody used that as a justification for rescinding their participation in a totally separate agreement.
This has to be one of the dumbest posts I've ever read.

So your stance because TMO has a history of sniping people's noble's, it is OK, but when IB escalates in response it isn't? Also, how can you call the OOA and Noble agreements separate? One absolutely affects the other, because without both the other makes no sense - at least to the guilds who are willing to play FTE lottery on noble. No one wants to go back to that, but if TMO has carte blanche to snipe other guild's noble's, what incentive does IB have to stay in this agreement.

What should be happening in this thread is everyone who cares about this agreement telling TMO to stay out of sky when it isn't their day, IB apologizing for going nuclear, and everyone moving on. Putting the blame solely on IB only encourages TMO to do this again, which will likely result in IB escalating again, which takes us right back to IB/TMO fighting over 1 noble/ooa/hand a week.

Basically what I'm trying to say Argh is that you're dumb and should feel bad.
  #82  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:15 PM
Arteker Arteker is offline
Fire Giant

Arteker's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm sorry Xasten, but that doesn't fly. When you ported up I'm sure IB flooded OOC with irritated complaints. At that point, the logical thing to do was back down:

If IB's raid suspension did not apply to sky, then you would be honoring the agreement.
If IB's raid suspension applied to Sky, then Sirken would probably extend their raid ban for another week and you guys would get a whole bunch of VP mobs while only losing noble.

Basically you guys saw the opportunity to play rule lawyer against IB. They threw a fit and killed 3 OOAs. Then Taken figured that if they killed their OOA/Hand they could get a few extra efreeti drops and point the finger at you guys.

As I said, the whole business just makes me sad, but it's what I've come to expect from the P1999 endgame where the average player's pixel lust makes a coke whore look rational.
there was not much ooc , they even did not showed up a single char in 1,5 . but yes there was alot of questions about if noble was yes or nai.

But back in the day in old suspensions u could not take either noble or the ooa.
  #83  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:17 PM
Arteker Arteker is offline
Fire Giant

Arteker's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's also the same behavior of people who condone their guild members to train raids. Amazing how it's a giant circle jerk of people shitting on each other, then try and point fingers.
i still have fraps of your old accidental trains in trakanon ledge back in the old days and when i hooked into kmorrax char u where gloatin in vessica die guild chat .
  #84  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:18 PM
Glenzig Glenzig is offline
Planar Protector

Glenzig's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,557
Default

So the thing in getting from all this is that I probably.really don't want to do any substantial raiding on p99. This all sounds so not fun. How can all this rule lawyering be enjoyable?
  #85  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:26 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So the thing in getting from all this is that I probably.really don't want to do any substantial raiding on p99. This all sounds so not fun. How can all this rule lawyering be enjoyable?
it's not
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #86  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:31 PM
Glenzig Glenzig is offline
Planar Protector

Glenzig's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,557
Default

Is it impossible to program a lockout timer on these mobs? Or would that just not be as classic as throwing poop at each other on the forums? I mean the whole raid scene is pretty far from classic right now anyway right?
  #87  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:35 PM
Ambrotos Ambrotos is offline
VIP / Contributor

Ambrotos's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i still have fraps of your old accidental trains in trakanon ledge back in the old days and when i hooked into kmorrax char u where gloatin in vessica die guild chat .
Cool let's watch it.
__________________
  #88  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:35 PM
Cecily Cecily is offline
Planar Protector

Cecily's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,839
Default

Define classic raid scene. Compare and contrast P99's raid scene with classic raid scene, guy who doesn't raid.
  #89  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:36 PM
Man0warr Man0warr is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,734
Default

Lockout timer as in making raid mobs invulnerable to players in X guild? Seems impossible.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will>
Manowarr - Druid

Blue
Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA>
Shiroe - 60 Enchanter
Manowarr - 60 Druid
  #90  
Old 06-06-2014, 02:38 PM
Glenzig Glenzig is offline
Planar Protector

Glenzig's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Define classic raid scene. Compare and contrast P99's raid scene with classic raid scene, guy who doesn't raid.
? <<<< that's called a question mark. I was not making a statement.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.