![]() |
|
#171
|
||||
|
Troof^
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#172
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#173
|
||||
|
Quote:
Using a 24 pally to pull and tank with. pull mob with prox agro only. When mob is coming into camp i intercept it before it can attack the sitters as i ran up ahead of them. Taunt DID work (you will not evade me soandso) Bash DID work, mob was stunned and did not move or attack. During time it was stunned I also attacked it. Even with all 3 actions it STILL attacked ALL sitting players. Once it had attacked the sitters it came back to me. Im leaving work right now, ill be back in about an hour to discuss more.
__________________
Team Bonghits
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#174
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you stopped to taunt before you were at the camp, then you were the only person on the aggro list and taunting the mob didn't do squat. Remember, taunt only puts you up to a threat level equal to JUST higher than the highest person on the list. Maybe what is on the server right now isn't classic, but if that is the case you guys need to find proof of that to convince the staff to implement a change. | |||
|
Last edited by Tecmos Deception; 02-26-2014 at 09:41 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#175
|
|||
|
Tecmos I did post proof, straight on how aggro works from a everquest classic dev. Sit was a bonus to aggro, WHILE on the hate list. Meaning it only increased your already aggro on a mob. The only way a sitting player would get aggro on an inc mob, is if that mob was aggro by proximity only, then if the tank was fast enough to step infront of the sitting players and generate aggro, they would not even get aggro then. Basically sitting really only came into play majorly after casting a spell and then sitting because if say heal did 400 aggro and you sat it would bonus it out to say 550 aggro, but the bonus would disappear soon as you stood. Also it seems they added sit aggro, but they never added the proximity aggro bonus. Read my earlier posts, it explains all this.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#176
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#177
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#178
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't see anything in your posts about how classic warriors could intercept a mob with a round or two of melee, as they dash towards sitting casters, and pull aggro. I also don't see any proof that this stuff applies to classic-kunark EQ; the posts are discussing spells that don't exist until after Velious and AAs and stuff. Not trying to be a troll, just working with my less-than-complete knowledge of this entire monster of a thread [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
|
||||
|
#179
|
|||
|
Need more data
__________________
Juhstin Bieber - Red99
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#180
|
||||
|
Quote:
After the taunt, bash, attack, it went for the sitters right away, i didnt drag it any further, at that point it was already in the camp. I just ran up and did taunt, bash, attack before it had to chance to reach the 1st sitter it was trying to attack. Alas, it did still went for the sitter and only came back to me once all sitters had been hit. While i understand that a taunt alone would not be enough, that is why i did a bash and attack as well. At this point since it was in camp, the sitters were on its agro list before i taunted. So that should have put me 1 point above the sitters and the bash and attack should have been enough to keep the mob on me since no one had done anything else yet.
__________________
Team Bonghits
| |||
|
Last edited by Yoite; 02-26-2014 at 10:07 AM..
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|