Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #601  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:11 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This "proposal" is a joke. You will not get a consensus on it, period. Move on or enjoy not raiding.
I've enjoyed raiding for some time now.

There are other proposals I like more.

When I was in Acyrid I remember thinking I would be happy if TMO gave us the chance to kill one mob a month, just to see the shit and experience classic EQ. I accepted that i'd never be raid geared or get my epic. I think I've raided enough now to be satisfied, at least seeing the content. If it's between not raiding and full rotation with people as bitter and lazy as you. I'm fine with taking a break for a while. Not that all people in other guilds are bitter and lazy, but I'm assuming you are.
Last edited by Hitpoint; 01-01-2014 at 02:13 PM..
  #602  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:12 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If one extreme is a full rotation, and the other extreme is the top guilds dominating, then wouldn't the middle ground be . . . half rotation and half FFA? And is this not exactly what Divinity proposed?
No it wouldn't because we'd be on the full rotation. Half and half is not middle ground.
  #603  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:13 PM
Bossman Bossman is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There are other proposals I like more.

When I was in Acyrid I remember thinking I would be happy if TMO gave us the chance to kill one mob a month, just to see the shit and experience classic EQ. I think I've raided enough now to be satisfied, at least seeing the content. If it's between not raiding and full rotation with people as bitter and lazy as you. I'm fine with taking a break for a while.
Sweet dude see you in Velious. One close-minded Zerg down, 200 to go.
  #604  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:15 PM
Bossman Bossman is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No it wouldn't because we'd be on the full rotation. Half and half is not middle ground.
This might be the dumbest post I have ever seen. Kudos!
  #605  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:15 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sweet dude see you in Velious. One close-minded Zerg down, 200 to go.
Lol, and all these agreements are going to be mute come Velious. Guess I'll definitly see you then. Crying on the boards for another rotation.
  #606  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:16 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No it wouldn't because we'd be on the full rotation. Half and half is not middle ground.
Half and half is not middle ground? Are you kidding me? And you are on the rotation section of Divinity's proposal. It gives TMO+FE+IB as group 2/3 of the mobs every month weekly . . which is more than half.

I am honestly not sure how to talk to you.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
  #607  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:18 PM
Kope Kope is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No it wouldn't because we'd be on the full rotation. Half and half is not middle ground.
How would less than half of the days of the month on rotation, and the rest (> 50%) be pure competition not be the middle ground? What logic is your "full rotation" coming from? I don't understand that at all.
  #608  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:26 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Half and half is not middle ground? Are you kidding me? And you are on the rotation section of Divinity's proposal. It gives TMO+FE+IB as group 2/3 of the mobs every month weekly . . which is more than half.

I am honestly not sure how to talk to you.
To be fair, I'm going to explain my mindset a little bit more.

You are assuming that BDA and Taken will never get a mob on the other two weeks of the month. They already do now. They lock down Vox and Inny. BDA beat us to Talendor just yesterday. And we were more than happy about it. Because that's what we've wanted to see. Another guild at least trying. They could have had Sev easily if their FTEer had hit him first, pure coinflip. BDA got FTE on Druushk and got him to 50%, with one more bard he'd have probably been dead. Taken got last VS. These guilds are more than capable of competing, they have been for a long while. And now they are starting to actually try. These past two weeks have guilds trying things they didn't in the past, and they're going to keep trying and getting better. While TMO has only gotten weaker. This server could get very interesting very soon.

You know what you're overlooking about all these different agreements? We (tmo and fe/IB) are not allowed to compete with other guilds on their time, while they are absolutely allowed to compete with us. We could break up with IB, or BDA could step up onto our tier, or TMO could fucking shut us down and we don't get anything. It's not just 2 or 3 guilds sharing for those two weeks, more competition can appear for us. In short, we aren't guaranteed any number of mobs like you seem to think. And frankly I'm fine with that as long as we have a chance to get a decent number, and two weeks is not enough. That's why I don't like Divinity's proposal. Because it kills competition instead of foster it.
Last edited by Hitpoint; 01-01-2014 at 02:31 PM..
  #609  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:31 PM
Bossman Bossman is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just for the sake of argument..

You're just assuming that BDA and Taken will never get a mob on the other two weeks of the month? They already do now. They beat us to Talendor just yesterday. And we were more than happy about it. Because that's what we've wanted to see. Another guild at least trying. They could have had Sev easily if their FTEer had hit him first, pure coinflip. Taken has gotten the last 4 or 5 Innys, they got last VS. These guilds are more than capable of competing. And now they are starting to actually try. You know what you're overlooking about all these different agreements? We're not allowed to compete with other guilds on their time, while they are absolutely allowed to compete with us. We could break up with IB, or BDA could step up onto our tier, or TMO could fucking shut us down and we don't get anything.In short, we aren't guaranteed any number of mobs. And frankly I'm fine with that as long as we have a chance to get a decent number. That's why I don't like Divinity's proposal. Because it kills competition instead of foster it.
Your "competition" is stupid. The majority of the server feel this way. If you like "competing" this much, go to red and try to unseat the top guild there. TMO started it and you fools perpetuated it. Not our fault.
Last edited by Bossman; 01-01-2014 at 02:33 PM..
  #610  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:32 PM
DrKvothe DrKvothe is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 412
Default

It sounds like you don't like it because the competition is twice as risky, and you're scared to lose out.
__________________
Winga - 59 Barbarian Shaman <BDA>
Hairyporter - 29 Halfling Druid
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.