Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:27 PM
Clark Clark is offline
Planar Protector

Clark's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 5,148
Default

Also Autotune needs to take a chill pill
  #152  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:28 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yendors blah.
There is not a guild out there that can out poop TMO/FE/IB. Not a guild even close to that. So if poopin was allowed on Tier A raids... You would't be those 3(the ones with alts). Not to mention FTE is gained from motivated pooper/trackers. How many times did TMO snag a VS fte with 3-5 poopers vs 15+ FE poopers. 4+?
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #153  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:34 PM
Racun Racun is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 57
Default

Yet you wont agree to no FTE sniping which is effectively the same as DA stalling - I'm talking about FTE sniping where your FTE is not followed by an immediate engage.

Your motives for wanting DA stalling and poopsocking removed are why this isn't about improving the spirit of competition vs. improving things for TMO. You wanted DA stalling removed prior to TMO's suspension due to the fact you were losing targets to FE/IB as they were using this tactic. You want poopsocking removed as this is the only way smaller guilds can compete as they don't have an alt army to log out at raid targets.

Present a proposal that improves the raid environment for everyone rather than just improving the raid environment for just the top guilds and I'm sure you will have more people agreeing to it.
  #154  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:35 PM
sanforce sanforce is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 323
Default

This plan drastically increases the number of targets that Tier B guilds currently see (a large improvement). Tier B guilds getting together to completely ruin the spirit of competition shouldn't be taken seriously. These are large guilds, but they aren't true raid guilds because the can't/won't compete. It's humorous to think that their share all plans would have any traction. Alarti has come up with a sensible plan that improves the raid scene, is easy to follow/understand, and gives Tier B a clear path to becoming a competitive raid guild. I don't see what's not to like, other than Tier B wanting everything placed in their lap with only ForumQuest effort.
  #155  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:41 PM
Spitty Spitty is offline
Fire Giant

Spitty's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Present a proposal that improves the raid environment for everyone rather than just improving the raid environment for just the top guilds and I'm sure you will have more people agreeing to it.
Have you not read most of this thread?

You've already answered this question in the literal sense by the content of your replies, but I'm asking you rhetorically in the hopes that you might get over yourself and figure out that this is a working proposal here.
__________________
[60 ORACLE] SPITULSKI <The A-Team>
Batmanning today for a better tomorrow.
  #156  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:46 PM
Racun Racun is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 57
Default

If that's the case then everyone will be in here agreeing to the proposal and I will be proven wrong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #157  
Old 01-01-2014, 12:40 AM
Turp_SmokinPurp Turp_SmokinPurp is offline
Kobold

Turp_SmokinPurp's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Catherin- [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'll make this clear too.

Im more than willing to be raid suspended for a week, or a month, or longer, if that's what its going to take for a proper agreement. This doesn't hurt me. This doesn't hurt the smaller guilds.
Not sure if I can say that about everyone in the top Guilds though so you had better think about that.
__________________

Turp --- Purp
60 Shm 60 Wiz
  #158  
Old 01-01-2014, 12:49 AM
Troubled Troubled is offline
Sarnak

Troubled's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 461
Default

Remove socking rule. Add a 10 day crossover for VS/CT/Trak for CatB guilds and you might be on to something. Leave the #s in place for catA reqs so catB guilds share CT/VS/Trak during crossover.
__________________
Last edited by Troubled; 01-01-2014 at 12:56 AM..
  #159  
Old 01-01-2014, 03:08 AM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Catherin- [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'll make this clear too.

Im more than willing to be raid suspended for a week, or a month, or longer, if that's what its going to take for a proper agreement for everyone. This doesn't hurt me. This doesn't hurt the smaller guilds. Taken looses the respectable number of targets we get but it also gives us a break from this toxicity in the promise of something better in the future for all of us.

Not sure if I can say that about everyone in the top Guilds though so you had better think about that.
Full quote instead of an edited version tailored to spread misinfo and scare the masses

keep smokin purp, turp
  #160  
Old 01-01-2014, 03:09 AM
Tyym Tyym is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2010
Location: Santa Rosa California
Posts: 99
Default

Alarti I can't believe I am saying this but I support some of the others when I say you might be onto something. See even the insufferable twat can agree with you at times.

As for Troubledour' post -
Quote:
Remove socking rule. Add a 10 day crossover for VS/CT/Trak for CatB guilds and you might be on to something. Leave the #s in place for catA reqs so catB guilds share CT/VS/Trak during crossover.
There is nothing we can do that will make you guys happy short of just not showing up period. Alarti's suggestion gives you guys about everything you asked for yet you just want more more more.

Morphius
Forceful Entry
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.