Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Important > News & Announcements

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:05 AM
DrKvothe DrKvothe is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 412
Default

Just to be clear, it is the argument of those complaining about this decision that it was 2 individuals only? These two individuals performed the unforgivable exploit on each of these accounts without the knowledge of others within the guild, even those who actually own the accounts? They didn't just use the accounts for various in-game activities, they actually used the exploit on these accounts, correct?

I wonder how many of the 20 non-TMO tagged accounts actually belong to TMO members?

Some might argue that it's unfair to the rest of the server that the GMs allowed your guild to remain intact after this unprecedentedly massive and outrageous breach in server policy. Especially with velious around the corner and a significant portion of content for everyone depending largely on your future good behavior.
__________________
Winga - 59 Barbarian Shaman <BDA>
Hairyporter - 29 Halfling Druid
  #152  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:07 AM
heazels heazels is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just to be clear, it is the argument of those complaining about this decision that it was 2 individuals only? These two individuals performed the unforgivable exploit on each of these accounts without the knowledge of others within the guild, even those who actually own the accounts? They didn't just use the accounts for various in-game activities, they actually used the exploit on these accounts, correct?

I wonder how many of the 20 non-TMO tagged accounts actually belong to TMO members?

Some might argue that it's unfair to the rest of the server that the GMs allowed your guild to remain intact after this unprecedentedly massive and outrageous breach in server policy. Especially with velious around the corner and a significant portion of content for everyone depending largely on your future good behavior.
The accounts may have been purchased with the exploit. who knows. Most of them may not even have real owners
  #153  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:14 AM
Rararboker Rararboker is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 728
Default

Well seeing as how this subject hasn't been covered in ... 17 pages, what was the exploit anyway?
  #154  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:14 AM
kbnexus kbnexus is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just to be clear, it is the argument of those complaining about this decision that it was 2 individuals only? These two individuals performed the unforgivable exploit on each of these accounts without the knowledge of others within the guild, even those who actually own the accounts? They didn't just use the accounts for various in-game activities, they actually used the exploit on these accounts, correct?

I wonder how many of the 20 non-TMO tagged accounts actually belong to TMO members?

Some might argue that it's unfair to the rest of the server that the GMs allowed your guild to remain intact after this unprecedentedly massive and outrageous breach in server policy. Especially with velious around the corner and a significant portion of content for everyone depending largely on your future good behavior.
See massive SEQ use. BDA had a very high amount of SEQ users. BDA wasnt banned IB wasnt banned just the offenders were suspended and de-leveled.

This scale has precedence in the past however TMO was very low on the SEQ percentage list, so we couldnt be targeted.
  #155  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:15 AM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

Most of the probably don't have owners and/or are affiliated with TMO.

Regardless, they still need to be disbanded.

Actually, scratch that, they need to be unable to leave the guild and have permanent raid bans.

Need to make sure we know exactly who loaned their accounts out to these cheaters.

Forum celebrities in TMO, especially ones who stir the pot in RnF, get no sympathy from me.

May you guys never raid again.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
  #156  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:15 AM
Pheer Pheer is offline
Fire Giant

Pheer's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbnexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
See massive SEQ use. BDA had a very high amount of SEQ users. BDA wasnt banned IB wasnt banned just the offenders were suspended and de-leveled.

This scale has precedence in the past however TMO was very low on the SEQ percentage list, so we couldnt be targeted.

^ desperate deflection
  #157  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:17 AM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pheer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
^ desperate deflection
I've got a quote for that:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Keep trying to white knight, exploiting scum.
Feel free to use it anywhere applicable.
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #158  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:18 AM
Nizzarr Nizzarr is offline
Planar Protector

Nizzarr's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,644
Default

We're recruiting on red, best pve guild on both server! www.nihilumguild.com
  #159  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:18 AM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

These 2 faggots are probably being PLd new toons as we speak just like after the seq/Mq wave

This is way worse then what Holocaust did on red and you literally destroyed their guild and permabanned members
  #160  
Old 12-20-2013, 12:20 AM
kylok kylok is offline
Fire Giant

kylok's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 576
Default

I would bet money that the two actual dupers were IP banned.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunderfury View Post
In our darkest hour, a hero returns
Songs are being sung from every bard,
His passion is back and the fire burns,
With fear and renown, Norrath whispers: Uthgaard
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.