Not Camping = Abusing IP Exemption / Pullin Cards On Deceitful

[Bantam 1]

Originally Posted by happyhappy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Being able to bypass the /camp mechanic and only be one loading bar away from engaging a contested monster not rule breaking to you?

I think he's just straw manning the issue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


It's basically using the IP exemption to save yourself time when rushing to mobs... which the argument is that "Is it really the intended use of an ip exemption?"

And 1 of his screen shots (if my memory serves cause it looked like KC) is him popping over to a druid to check VS.

[bizzum]

Originally Posted by Bantam 1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think he's just straw manning the issue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just giving my honest opinion [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[big mouth chew]

wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww wwww whocares

[happyhappy]

Originally Posted by bizzum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, its two loading bars, and no, I guess I disagree with you there. I don't think it could ever make a consistent difference. The pictures from the stream are him changing from a mule to a mule to some random character. Is that abuse?

It's only 1 loading bar if the second account is at char select on another client.

[bizzum]

Originally Posted by happyhappy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's only 1 loading bar if the second account is at char select on another client.

I'm pretty sure at one point one of the GMs/guides hopped into our guild chat months ago and said you can't have a character sitting at character select like that. Were we the only guild that got this talk!?

I'm strictly talking about two accounts, one client (gross).

[bizzum]

Perhaps not a 100% iron fist "this is illegal" ultimatum, but surely a "you're not supposed to be doing this stop it" sort of thing.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Bantam 1]

Originally Posted by bizzum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just giving my honest opinion [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, but you're leaving out what the real accusation is.

I'm not sitting here thinking its the biggest issue ever, but its a rules arguement (which again is part of raiding).

Guild 1 - has lots of extra accounts to hop about quickly (even quicker with ip exemption is the point).

Guild 2 - Probably has only some of that capability and is rules lawyering to take away that perceived advantage (or some of it).


PS - nice screenie - yep so it saves only 1 loading screen assuming same account.

[Apeople]

Ah good, nice post zagum, glad to see jeremy should have all his ip exemptions removed.

[fullmetalcoxman]

Originally Posted by bizzum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Were we the only guild that got this talk!?

What does this tell you?

[bizzum]

Originally Posted by Apeople [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ah good, nice post zagum, glad to see jeremy should have all his ip exemptions removed.

Actaully Jeremy never had two clients open at once so it really has nothing to do with that statement from Zade.

I don't see the issue. If his friends come over to play / roommate plays with him, should he still be forced to camp even though he could /q and change accounts if they are not currently logged in, because its not fair he logged over to his other mule faster? There is no exploiting/evading an in-game death from this, and he's not running two clients, either.