Why is training allowed on p99 in veeshan's peak? (poll asking your opinion)

[timhutton]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, we were told VP had no GM involvement. In those very early days, TMO killed a VP dragon. After the VP dragon was dead IB killed all the TMO survivors. IB was ready to delete the loots on the dead dragon. Then out of thin air Rogean appeared and ruled VP did have rules and that IB would suffer consequences if we looted the dead dragon's corpse who we were now standing over with no TMO in zone. This was a guild on guild event.

I am merely providing everyone pro or con with context regarding a decision made by the head man in charge during the very early days of VP.

FWIW I believe it was determined that ninjalooting would be considered a server rule or part of the PnP or some shit? That was the justification as to why it would be handled by a GM. The same type of thing that occured when VD was mem-blurring mobs, because it was "exploiting a bug" it didn't matter that occured in VP.

Basically:

the show where everything's made up and the points don't matter

Just substitute points for rules.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, we were told VP had no GM involvement. In those very early days, TMO killed a VP dragon. After the VP dragon was dead IB killed all the TMO survivors. IB was ready to delete the loots on the dead dragon. Then out of thin air Rogean appeared and ruled VP did have rules and that IB would suffer consequences if we looted the dead dragon's corpse who we were now standing over with no TMO in zone. This was a guild on guild event.

I am merely providing everyone pro or con with context regarding a decision made by the head man in charge during the very early days of VP.

I'll give you that one.

[Sarius]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, we were told VP had no GM involvement. In those very early days, TMO killed a VP dragon. After the VP dragon was dead IB killed all the TMO survivors. IB was ready to delete the loots on the dead dragon. Then out of thin air Rogean appeared and ruled VP did have rules and that IB would suffer consequences if we looted the dead dragon's corpse who we were now standing over with no TMO in zone. This was a guild on guild event.

I am merely providing everyone pro or con with context regarding a decision made by the head man in charge during the very early days of VP.

I really don't see how you can have one rule and not the other. Makes no sense whatsoever. So if you were to keep training them so they cannot loot the mob and the loots rot, that is ok? If you loot the mob with 1 second left on timer and nobody from killing guild anywhere near it, that's ninja looting?

[timhutton]

Originally Posted by Sarius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I really don't see how you can have one rule and not the other. Makes no sense whatsoever. So if you were to keep training them so they cannot loot the mob and the loots rot, that is ok? If you loot the mob with 1 second left on timer and nobody from killing guild anywhere near it, that's ninja looting?

Yes.

[getsome]

Originally Posted by Sarius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I really don't see how you can have one rule and not the other. Makes no sense whatsoever. So if you were to keep training them so they cannot loot the mob and the loots rot, that is ok? If you loot the mob with 1 second left on timer and nobody from killing guild anywhere near it, that's ninja looting?

No.

[Fazlazen]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, we were told VP had no GM involvement. In those very early days, TMO killed a VP dragon. After the VP dragon was dead IB killed all the TMO survivors. IB was ready to delete the loots on the dead dragon. Then out of thin air Rogean appeared and ruled VP did have rules and that IB would suffer consequences if we looted the dead dragon's corpse who we were now standing over with no TMO in zone. This was a guild on guild event.

I am merely providing everyone pro or con with context regarding a decision made by the head man in charge during the very early days of VP.

Oh is that the story of when Zeelot shit on your entire guild Getsome? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[hatelore]

Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Velious does take skill. Even velk or dain takes a bit of skill. Getting to Zlandicar can take some skill. Klandi/Sont take skill simply due to being outside + dragon fear, which can be an issue in WW.

The only real mobs that take skill now is gore due to the fact she can become a 60k dragon if she gets a cheal off, and hosh due to his ae being a wtf pwn. Nexona used to be semi difficult but I think they fixed her Harm Touch.

Rumbleroot definitely wasn't a chump.

[getsome]

Are you the same person who begged us to let you have vox after you had not gotten one mob on a server reset? And then after we left you and your raid force got ported out for being above level 52+ and we came in with our alts to kill it?

[kotton05]

I keep goin thru vp and it's empty. I Like the new mechanics and pathing.

I'm for training. Made a few friends during it, not sure about enemies>_<

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by timhutton [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wow. So you actually admit to not wanting classic EQ "competition"? You would rather have griefing and training than people knowing spawn-timers and showing up with a force to kill a target?

That's ridiculous.

Yeah, right?