![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
![]() ok i removed this after I uh, scrolled down, but I'm still pretty sure from my last few groups that mobs that were blue/light blue to me gave no exp due to higher levels being in the group, so maybe this thing i wrote still applies:
Quote:
| |||
Last edited by Loxo; 07-02-2012 at 12:20 AM..
Reason: I keep finding threads, but not the one with the thing i want to read
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() while maintaining current level requirements obv
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
![]() According to the wiki, experience is distributed based on experience totals.
To paraphrase, consider mob experience to be a big pie. The pie is divided up proportionate to each member's current experience total. By experience total, I mean all of the experience the character has ever gained. So a higher level character gets a bigger piece of the pie than a lower level character of the same class and race. To give an example, lets say 3 people form a group, and their totals are 100, 100, and 150 experience ever gained. They kill a mob who yields 7 experience (after taking zone xp multiplier into consideration). The two 100's would get 2 xp each, and the 150 would get 3 xp. Hybrids and some races take more or less experience to get to the same point. The extreme examples are halfling warriors, who require 0.95 * 0.9 = 85.5% experience to level, and troll/iksar sks, who require 1.2 * 1.4 = 168% experience. When grouping with these characters, if you are the same level as them you will get a bigger or smaller piece of the pie than you otherwise would. The difference in experience between levels tends to be bigger than the difference between hybrids vs non hybrids. To quote straight from the game mechanics page: at the experience total 10,000,000, a human monk is level 20, a halfling warrior level 22, and a troll sk level 18. So as you can see, if you were a 20 monk, you'd much rather group with an 18 SK than a 22 monk because you'll get more experience with the SK. As far as minimum level for group experience, take the lowest level and multiply by 1.5 (round down) or highest level and multiply by 0.667 (round up). A level 20 can group up to 1.5 * 20 = 30, and a level 30 can group down to 0.667 * 30 = 20. The lesson to be learned from all that is: group with people who have similar xp totals. Try not to group with too-much higher level players, especially not hybrids, but don't kick a hybrid out just for being one, especially if they're a little lower level than you. I don't know what determines whether you get xp from a mob or not while in a compatible group though. Sometimes I get xp from greens in groups, sometimes not. I don't know how it's decided. | ||
Last edited by easy_lee; 07-02-2012 at 02:32 PM..
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() i think i get the distribution, i did read the wiki game mechanics like i said. its the yield in regards to the highest lvl in the group. currently it seems no one in the group gets exp if the highest level in the group does not get exp such as in my example where a player levels during the group.
the classic ruleset allowed the rest of the group to continue to get exp, and just divided the pie among the characters who still got exp. if there were a group of three 100s, and one levels to 150 the mobs turn gree to him. the now 150 would start getting 0 exp while the yielded exp was divided among the rest of the group who were still 100; giving the two 100's 3.5 exp. that had its serious problems though and im glad not to see it on p1999. i was wondering what thoughts were on a middle ground distribution of exp that mimicked the claasic ruleset without being broken... where the 100s continue to gain 2 exp per kill instead of 3.5 (claasic) or 0 (current p1999). thank you for the informative reply and sorry if anything is difficult to read, posting from my phone.
__________________
Loxwell - A dwarf for the ages
| ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
That's certainly not something I remember. Got any evidence? | |||
|
#6
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Now I don't know how it works if a 40 and 60 are grouped and mob being killed is green to the 60. | |||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() Some mod info on what mobs give exp and what mobs don't in groups would be great. Does the mob con against the average level of the group, or the highest level, or the lowest level or what?
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() Example from what I've seen on this server:
3 person group in Crushbone. Level 7 cleric, 6 bard, and a 6 warrior. Orc cent cons green to the cleric but blue to bard and warrior = 0 experience for anyone. In my recollection of classic EQ: Same group and kill would yield experience for the bard and warrior but no experience for the cleric, but the cleric would still take their portion from the total ... e.g. if orc was worth 100 experience bard and warrior would each get 30ish (fudging numbers here) and cleric would get 0. Or it may have been like Loxo mentioned where the cleric's portion wasn't lost and the warrior and bard each got 50ish (though that is/was kinda silly/exploitable IMO). But I really never remember the case of getting 0 experience for a non-green mob if group was all in the 2/3 low/high range. The way it seems to be working on this server is really annoying for grouping as it forces the group to move to harder areas sooner then they should need to (or nobody gets experience). It also removes the mechanism for normalizing group level by killing mobs that the highest level in the group gets no experience for but that the lower levels still do. | ||
Last edited by soniknoise; 07-02-2012 at 03:05 PM..
|
|
![]() |
|
|