VA live reporter shooting

[Ranndom]

Supposed shooter is a light skinned black man, shooter in video is clearly white.
Bodies are still warm, and suddenly every politician has an empty schedule and has speeches prepared to spread the gun control agenda.
Another event just going to be used to twist and divide the American people into hating each other instead of the government.
Just an fyi, gun control doesn't work. And when it does work, You're on your way to Treblinka or Belzec. Or perhaps you'll be lucky and sent to Auschwitz II.

[Swish]

Even if gun control laws reached UK levels there's no way there's existing paperwork on the millions of guns out there. If I was an American citizen I would definitely own one for self defence and defence of my property/family/etc.

Here you're stuck with a baseball bat or a sharp knife :/

[Ranndom]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Even if gun control laws reached UK levels there's no way there's existing paperwork on the millions of guns out there. If I was an American citizen I would definitely own one for self defence and defence of my property/family/etc.

Here you're stuck with a baseball bat or a sharp knife :/

UK levels are just stupid. However, the population their has largely grown extremely ignorant to firearms...and well...at this point the UK would need a quite lengthy "rehab" to actually become a free people. Though, US isnt much different.

[Snapple]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Even if gun control laws reached UK levels there's no way there's existing paperwork on the millions of guns out there. If I was an American citizen I would definitely own one for self defence and defence of my property/family/etc.

Here you're stuck with a baseball bat or a sharp knife :/

But most of the times so is the criminal - which is entirely the point.

[Ranndom]

Originally Posted by Snapple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But most of the times so is the criminal - which is entirely the point.

Uh huh, because a criminal will go out and legally purchase a couple hundred dollar handgun just to rob 100 dollars from a convenient store.
Also, you do realize the governments are the most dangerous criminals of them all, right?
Makes sense for the criminals to not want armed opposition, doesnt it?

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Snapple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But most of the times so is the criminal - which is entirely the point.

Right because when you make a law that prohibits something criminals tend to follow it, most of the time.

Wait, what?

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Right because when you make a law that prohibits something criminals tend to follow it, most of the time.

Wait, what?

Isn't that automatic? If you break the law you're a criminal. I'm not sure what you meant here.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Isn't that automatic? If you break the law you're a criminal. I'm not sure what you meant here.

With 100's of millions of small arms in the US, any prohibition on possession thereof would only be followed by rational law abiding citizens. The idea therefore that criminals would not have them is naive.

The policy could only hope to work where such weapons are already scarce and import is particularly burdensome.

[Ranndom]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Isn't that automatic? If you break the law you're a criminal. I'm not sure what you meant here.

theres so many forgotten and pointless laws in the US that at any given time you're breaking at least 50

[Shrubwise]

Yeah. Clearly white.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]