Give Rangers Beastlord Pets

[Ziggy]

Seriously, don't you feel bad for rangers? Chain armor, hybrid penalty, worthless buffs. There is no light at the end of the tunnel as Rangers pretty much continue to suck until Luclin. My solution would be to give Rangers the Beastlord Warder line of spells in a fashon similar to how they were at the start of Luclin (still a spell, poofs when zoned, ect.), and then MAYBE give them one or two pet buffs like the pet DD proc line or pet haste ect., beastlords got a lot of pet utility to pick from. It doesn't matter what animal it is, and maybe you could let rangers do a quest to choose. I don't think they should have more than one "type" of pet (like mage).

[fadetree]

No. We like being hard to play. Keeps the riffraff out.

[Ziggy]

Originally Posted by fadetree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No. We like being hard to play. Keeps the riffraff out.

I'm posting this from the perspective of someone who might potentially group with a ranger if they could do some actual DPS. It's not about ranger being difficult to play as much as ranger being not worth the time.

[Taffan]

Originally Posted by Ziggy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm posting this from the perspective of someone who might potentially group with a ranger if they could do some actual DPS. It's not about ranger being difficult to play as much as ranger being not worth the time.

There are a lot of bad rangers, but if geared/played right, they can do good dps and pull better then monks (in some situations.)

[coki]

Originally Posted by Taffan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are a lot of bad rangers, but if geared/played right, they can do good dps and pull better then monks (in some situations.)

you mean the 1% situation?

[Taffan]

Originally Posted by coki [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you mean the 1% situation?

The outdoor situation for lull.

[Bodybagger]

Originally Posted by fadetree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No. We like being hard to play. Keeps the riffraff out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yv7UJLOyERs

hahahhahaa

[Thatt]

uh, because classic.

[Ziggy]

Originally Posted by Thatt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

uh, because classic.

stop thinking of classic as an exact list of what the game was back then, and start thinking of what the spirit of Classic Everquest is all about.

[Tulnavara]

Originally Posted by Ziggy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

stop thinking of classic as an exact list of what the game was back then, and start thinking of what the spirit of Classic Everquest is all about.

You're on the wrong project if you're thinking this way. The owners of the box have stated numerous times that they want this game to be as close to how it was in '99-01 as they can possibly get it.