Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2014, 01:12 PM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default Mobs per guild with regards to a rotation

I see the number 9 or 10 used to calculate the mobs per guild numbers used in both non rotation proposals and rotation proposals. That number is probably accurate with regards to a system in which guilds are still required to compete in the traditional system. However, in the context of a rotation with a long grace period (8 hours?) that number is incredibly inaccurate and misleading when it comes to mobs per guild for rotations.

The biggest difference between what is necessary in a FFA competition and a rotation is that guild member numbers in FFA are numbers of raiders at the span of window hours, whereas in a rotation you know what days you will be raiding and with a long grace period are able to be near max numbers for every target. This means tertiary guilds in a competitive system, should make the cut in a rotation system.

Most citations of guilds killing raid mobs in a rotation include:

TMO
IB
FE
BDA
Taken
A-team
Europa
Divinity
Azure guard
Doljabronis

However, this list should also be expanded to include:

Supremacy
Knights who say Ni
Just a Phase
Indignation
Mari Kita
The alliance

I've raided with or have done encounters with most of these guilds and they are more than capable of downing any/most of the mobs in available in the rotation when given a clear shot with no competition and a huge grace period, little to no tracking required, and have adequate numbers at full force.

I've seen the number of kills per guild in a 35/35 mob split being represented as hovering around 5. This number is more accurately 2.69 if these guilds who should be added are Given rotation slots. This drastically reduces the mobs per guild in a rotation.
  #2  
Old 01-02-2014, 01:20 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

2.69 > 0

/thread
  #3  
Old 01-02-2014, 03:05 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
2.69 > 0

/thread
  #4  
Old 01-02-2014, 01:29 PM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,972
Default

+ Avatars of Discord
  #5  
Old 01-02-2014, 01:42 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

The suggested rule was that any guild that can kill the Spiroc Lord is added to the rotation. I do not believe any of your guilds can, but I would not mind being proven wrong.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
  #6  
Old 01-02-2014, 02:32 PM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The suggested rule was that any guild that can kill the Spiroc Lord is added to the rotation. I do not believe any of your guilds can, but I would not mind being proven wrong.
The problem with that is that there is already another rotation blocking these guilds from sky (see: lord bob). Unless there is a slot left open solely for the purpose of killin the spiroc lord for admittance into the rotation, I see this as a huge arbitrary barrier to entry that unilaterally favors the guilds currently on the sky rotation.

I think any requirements for entry imposed on these guilds would be without merit seeing as they've been locked out of negotiations and have been told to voice their opinions through a proxy.
  #7  
Old 01-02-2014, 02:40 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The problem with that is that there is already another rotation blocking these guilds from sky (see: lord bob). Unless there is a slot left open solely for the purpose of killin the spiroc lord for admittance into the rotation, I see this as a huge arbitrary barrier to entry that unilaterally favors the guilds currently on the sky rotation.

I think any requirements for entry imposed on these guilds would be without merit seeing as they've been locked out of negotiations and have been told to voice their opinions through a proxy.
Have you read Divinity's plan? It specifically covers this: if you want to take a shot at the spiroc lord, ask the guild currently clearing sky to help get you up to 5. Sure you'll have to pay 50p each for coffins, but that's not a huge problem. And the Spiroc Lord repops immediately if the guardian is up, so it costs the active guild nothing.

And some subset of the smaller guilds wanted to band together to get a sufficient force, I don't think anyone would have a problem with this either.

I really don't think we are trying to screw you guys here.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
  #8  
Old 01-02-2014, 02:47 PM
Valoril Valoril is offline
Orc


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Have you read Divinity's plan? It specifically covers this: if you want to take a shot at the spiroc lord, ask the guild currently clearing sky to help get you up to 5. Sure you'll have to pay 50p each for coffins, but that's not a huge problem. And the Spiroc Lord repops immediately if the guardian is up, so it costs the active guild nothing.

And some subset of the smaller guilds wanted to band together to get a sufficient force, I don't think anyone would have a problem with this either.
I am also 99% sure that it'd be no problem. In the list of the guilds above (BDA, Taken, A-team, Europa, Divinity, Azure guard) I don't see a single one that would IMHO try to be a bastard and disrupt an attempt.
On the contrary, I could rather imagine that most if not all would help with the attempt if desired.
  #9  
Old 01-02-2014, 03:02 PM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The suggested rule was that any guild that can kill the Spiroc Lord is added to the rotation. I do not believe any of your guilds can, but I would not mind being proven wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Have you read Divinity's plan? It specifically covers this: if you want to take a shot at the spiroc lord, ask the guild currently clearing sky to help get you up to 5. Sure you'll have to pay 50p each for coffins, but that's not a huge problem. And the Spiroc Lord repops immediately if the guardian is up, so it costs the active guild nothing.

And some subset of the smaller guilds wanted to band together to get a sufficient force, I don't think anyone would have a problem with this either.

I really don't think we are trying to screw you guys here.
My error on not seeing the specific provision aimed at aiding in spiroc lord attempts, however, the point of this point wasn't at all aimed at discussing the entry process rather how drastic the real number of mobs per guilds differs from the ones being promoted, and how that should effect the sustainability of a rotation in both the short term and the long term.
  #10  
Old 01-02-2014, 03:07 PM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

A guild that does not want to continue to play under the restrictions of Tier2 can always be requested to be moved up to Tier 1... Im sure tier 1 would welcome the "competition"

Everyone that is currently labled as tier 2 are probably happy they are going to be able to see any raid targets at all now, compared to before where they did not. The upper end Tier 2 guilds are more than happy to concede the extra targets they "may" have gotten in a less restrictive agreement. This is because under the tier 2 playstyle, even though we may see a few less targets in the higher end of tier 2, we will finally see some targets that we never got to see in the previous abusive environment. (AKA Venril Sathir, Trakanon, and Cazic Thule)

I see tier 1 and tier 2 as different playstyles, not different ranks.
Last edited by -Catherin-; 01-02-2014 at 03:11 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.