![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
The retarded level range on this server has made pvp a newb farm fest on red99, griefing new players off at an alarming rate. Please, this is a classic server, let's go to what works the classic four up four down level range.
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
I think 4 is too low
I would go with 6 halfway b/w 8 and 4 | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Bump
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Ain't nothin special about duelist rogues and sunstrike wizards killing level 52's make it classic
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Agree.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
I agree to lower it, but not to 4
I think 6 is fair | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
+1
Would +1 again
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Think of a better solution. I'm an advocate of 4, but there was a reason Null originally made it 8.
How about something like. < 50 players online -------- 8 level range > 50 && <= 125 players online -------- 6 level range > 125 players online --------- 4 level range Or, scalable in some way. That's just a rough example. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|