![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
The effect should be able to be triggered from the inventory, thus used by classes who do not have access to the "Reclaim Energy" spell. This is currently not the case, as it gives a "your class/race/deity cannot use the item" message.
Shamans using it. Clickable from inventory slot. Quote:
People confirming that the effect can be used by other classes. Quote:
Another source stating that it can be used by shamans. Quote:
| |||||
|
Last edited by Gorroth; 07-06-2010 at 08:32 AM..
|
|
|||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
According to alakazam it's "Any Slot/Can Equip". Maybe this was changed at some point.
http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=64 | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
You provided evidence from 2001, which is post-Kunark. You need proof that your claims are actually classic.
__________________
Live: [67 Arch Convoker] Qaedain Magi'kot (High Elf)
P'99: [50 Magician] Qaedain (High Elf) | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
i highly doubt that they would have added the ability for other classes to use a mage focus items later on. if anything, they would have fixed/removed it
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Guh, not this argument again. Each time someone wants to be a cockblock about a minor thing, they fling around that pretext.
Content is tweaked for the Classic Era, not just "Classic" aka vanilla Everquest without any expansion. If the devs really want to go on a case-by-case basis and disable/re-enable stuff when they release expansions, that's their right. Other than that, things that were available during the EQ trilogy will be made available regardless of when *exactly* they were implemented (e.g. Wu's armor, etc.). Now about this particular topic, it's a small secret of the trade, something that wasn't very well documented. It took a bit of time for the players to find out about it and a little more to post about it, hence why the posts are Kunark-Velious era and not "true classic". For me, if people *really* want to make us believe that Verant went around and changed this item to be clickable by everyone from the inventory when it was only usable from the very start by mages only, they're either being buttholes or delusional about MMO development in general. For reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everquest # The Ruins of Kunark (March 2000) # The Scars of Velious (December 2000) # The Shadows of Luclin (December 2001) So yeah, the posts are indeed "Classic^TM" in my book. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
So your argument holds no truth or ground. As to the OP. Thatd be nice if they made it that way, Id actually get one! ANd eat my pets till I got a dark blue, and iIm sure Zilo could abuse his wolf procs for mana as well.
__________________
Phallax [55 Luminary]
Phallax [51 Mystic] Jeebs [40 Ranger] | |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Since Zilo's doggy only has 1 hp, he'd get a very poor return for reclaiming it. This however, may not be enough to stop Zilo. He's been known to slaughter dogs, kittens, and small children alike for the thrill alone. Also, to support your agruement, the below was taken from a classic "shaman" FoH website. (http://www.notacult.com/guide_trollshaman.html) Quote:
__________________
Abacab tells Phallax, "To be honest you're just a bunch of little bugs on my windshield that I have to wipe clean before I start cruise controlin' into phat lewtz."
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
The word here is "Should" be based on the HP of the pet, but not the"number" 1, 50, 125, 375 hp or whatever. It should be based on the %HP the pet has left when you reclaim it. if pet is at 33% hp you will only get 25% mana return This is not the case on P99 However. Try reclaiming a pet a 1% or 100%. you get the exact same amount back - 75% mana of pet summoning. Hense it can be vastly abused on P99, unless they change how reclaim works. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
Haynar | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|