Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-08-2011, 01:07 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default lull/pacify aggroing mobs

nevermind, was informed this is how it was. never played an enchanter so a bit foggy on them.
Last edited by Darwoth; 10-08-2011 at 02:49 AM..
  #2  
Old 10-08-2011, 09:10 AM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

rofl
  #3  
Old 10-08-2011, 09:37 AM
Palemoon Palemoon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 848
Default

This guy wanted enchanters to benevolence their way to non kos status in multiple dungeons across Norath too.

needs to be read again:

Quote:
And last for real, don’t let these players troll you guys into making bad decisions, they are very good at what they do (see: ninja trolls), and they will try to get you to make certain changes under false pretenses or with ulterior motives in mind.
  #4  
Old 10-08-2011, 11:52 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

as i mentioned, when incorrect i say so.

this has been the first time, please tug gently upon my balls if you insist on swinging from them.
  #5  
Old 10-08-2011, 11:56 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

yeah all of said factions (other than splitpaw which was dubious) were threatening to a druid, not deep scowl and enchanters used to roam freely through the 4 listed spots all the time in conjunction with benecolence and their own default faction.

hence the myriad of others who actually played the game in the relevant timeframe agreeing and recanting their own stories of such.
  #6  
Old 10-08-2011, 12:53 PM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yeah all of said factions (other than splitpaw which was dubious) were threatening to a druid, not deep scowl and enchanters used to roam freely through the 4 listed spots all the time in conjunction with benecolence and their own default faction.

hence the myriad of others who actually played the game in the relevant timeframe agreeing and recanting their own stories of such.
Find proof, post it, and then talk shit. This is not the first time you've been caught being entirely wrong.
  #7  
Old 10-08-2011, 12:59 PM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

the proof is in the other dozen people that actually played the game in said timeframe who also agree. if you would like to go round and round again on said topic feel free to post in the other thread as i am done with this one.
  #8  
Old 10-08-2011, 01:26 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
the proof is in the other dozen people that actually played the game in said timeframe who also agree. if you would like to go round and round again on said topic feel free to post in the other thread as i am done with this one.
That's not proof.

Honestly if you never played an enchanter I'm not sure how you remember enchanters being able to use benevolence to roam around dungeons freely. Since you haven't posted any evidence other than some people remembering it being a certain way, of course the devs aren't just going to change the factions, since this is a legitimate server. If you're so certain that you're right, browse the archives of everlore or some other old site and see what you can dig up.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #9  
Old 10-08-2011, 01:52 PM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

because i myself as a druid started dubious in one, threaten in the others.

i fought several enchanters in all locations that were kept specifically for the purpose, i had an enchanter friend who was a carebear faction junky and he recovered corpses for our raids in all of said areas. everytime we managed to mobilize enough people to take out a dragon we had to contend with different groups sending in a few shithead enchanters to try and mez healers/strip buffs/be a pain in the ass. when i was camping the corrupted seahorse for my epic we had to kill a gimpy enchanter several times that kept coming in and fucking with us.

once again:

splitpaw, starts as dubious for karana worshippers. probably others as well but my other alts that i can recall started as threatening.

kedge, everything on the phinigel faction started as threatening and could be bumped to dubious via benevolence. the generic pirahna type fish were still scowling to everyone and had no faction associated with them.

permafrost, goblins are on their own faction separate from nagafen/vox. all of the frost giants along with vox started as threaten and could be bumped to dubious. bear/spider pits were still kos.

sol b, similar to permafrost, everything in the dungeon started as scowling except for the fire giants and nagafen which could be bumped up.

mistmoore, everything started as threaten and could be bumped to dubious even via the lower level alliance.




once again the issue is that on this server everything seems to be starting one faction level lower than originally, which is why my druid started as threaten instead of dubious to splitpaw and amiable instead of kindly to a number of druid NPCs

since everybody who played in these areas in this timeframe remembers it the exact same way and has their own stories relating to such that is all the proof i need, i seriously doubt there is a long forgotten patch note for by the company that founded stealth nerfs about an issues that was considered trivial to the majority of the servers.


congratulations, you baited me into responding. which was probably your goal.
  #10  
Old 10-08-2011, 02:01 PM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're not fucking getting it.

Unless you support your inanity with proof, to the devs, you can't expect them to change the project based on your "memory" which is dubious at best.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.