Londonistan Muslim SS to enforce Sharia law on internet ghetto sites

[Daywolf]

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016...l-media-firms/
The office of London’s first Muslim mayor has secured millions of pounds to fund a police “online hate crime hub” to work in “partnership with social media providers” to criminalise “trolls” who “target… individuals and communities.”

https://youtu.be/--adipssnuo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
By establishing this unit, we are sending a strong message to those who use online forums to spread HATE that their actions will not be tolerated. The Metropolitan police service continues to have a zero-tolerance approach to all forms of HATE crime.

https://youtu.be/sTSA_sWGM44
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Convictions for crimes under Section 127 of the Communications Act of 2003, a law increasingly used to prosecute “internet trolls”, have increased ten-fold in a decade, official figures revealed in May last year. They showed 1,209 people were found guilty of offences under the law, compared with 143 in 2004, according to the Ministry of Justice.
In 2011, a Scottish football fan was sentenced to eight months in prison for insulting Celtic fans, Catholics and the Pope on a Facebook page under section 127.

https://youtu.be/EcWfAwp_uSk
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Jarnauga]

*breitbart article*

[stormlord]

If true--I have to be skeptical--Ministry of Justice reads more like Ministry of Truth.

Creepy if it were true.

How .long before they force us to take implants or pills to remove our untrue thoughts?

Let me tell you... About as long as it takes them to fully destroy the family and make babies in artificial wombs. They have to more fully subvert the parents (the family) first. They need to have access to the children at younger ages and more of it.

Lord knows most people will scramble to have the pills and implants because they're so utterly indoctrinated. They'll even pay to have it. In fact, that'll probably be the standard. They'll make you pay to have your children too. And you'll happily do it. In exchange, your life is made easier and more independent. Imagine what life is like without worrying about the children as much? And of course the world will be more peaceful. No more wars. Countries will work together and the UN will be replaced by something which has teeth.

What gets left unsaid in most of these discussions is humans are innately subservient. This is what you want deep down whether you confess to its presence or not. This is how Hitler came to power. This is the secret which is in plain sight.

Remember, it's all for peace, good health, the pursuit of knowledge and spiritual growth.

[R Flair]

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

*breitbart article*

libtard

Difference between us and you, is we can read and article from anywhere and make an educated judgement, but liberals are so scared of opposing views that they tie their own hands and remain willfully ignorant.

[big_ole_jpn]

Considered making a thread on this myself. The state of affairs in UK is horrifying. If they didn't have to share the anglosphere and economic interdependence with Americans they'd be full Orwell by now.

Never, ever, ever concede that speech can equal violence.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Considered making a thread on this myself. The state of affairs in UK is horrifying. If they didn't have to share the anglosphere and economic interdependence with Americans they'd be full Orwell by now.

Never, ever, ever concede that speech can equal violence.

That was the original intent behind freedom of speech.

You have these envelope suga pushas that want to get freedom of speech made into a limited right.

Its only a matter of time before speech is criminalized in the US, I think the wheels are already in motion. The JDL ADL been doing work 4 mad years

[Jarnauga]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

libtard

Difference between us and you, is we can read and article from anywhere and make an educated judgement, but liberals are so scared of opposing views that they tie their own hands and remain willfully ignorant.

Difference between me and you is i don't believe crazies parading as journalism just to confirm my screwed up views about the world. Facts don't support my views ? let's make up facts. Breitbart, alex jones, longroom, fox news.. same recipe.

Examples:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean, even the latest trope about hillary's health is just ridiculous. All the hype is coming from one "organisation": Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. that does sound great right ? omg that super serious sounding organisation says that hillary is basically a dead man walking [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

..except:

Articles and commentaries published in the journal have argued a number of non-mainstream or scientifically discredited claims, including:

that human activity has not contributed to climate change, and that global warming will be beneficial and thus not a cause for concern;
that HIV does not cause AIDS;
that the "gay male lifestyle" shortens life expectancy by 20 years.
that there is a link between abortion and the risk of breast cancer.
that there are possible links between autism and vaccinations.

A series of articles by pro-life authors published in the journal argued for a link between abortion and breast cancer. Such a link has been rejected by the scientific community, including the U.S. National Cancer Institute, the American Cancer Society, and the World Health Organization, among other major medical bodies.

A 2003 paper published in the journal, claiming that vaccination was harmful, was criticized for poor methodology, lack of scientific rigor, and outright errors by the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics. A National Public Radio piece mentioned inaccurate information published in the Journal and said: "The journal itself is not considered a leading publication, as it's put out by an advocacy group that opposes most government involvement in medical care."

The Journal has also published articles advocating politically and socially conservative policy positions, including:

that the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are unconstitutional;
that "humanists" have conspired to replace the "creation religion of Jehovah" with evolution;
that "anchor babies" are valuable to undocumented immigrants, particularly if the babies are disabled.

tl;dr: stop it with your "unbiased sources", all you do is pick and choose articles that fit into your narrative. Articles, not facts. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[big_ole_jpn]

You're right about the Hillary health thing being overblown. Check this shit, it's reaching for sure.

Her being carried up the stairs was worthy of coverage tho. I think her obvious health problems/drug use deserve note; the fact that clickbait media and (((Breitbart))) run with it to silly degrees doesn't change that fact.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Examples:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey yeah that's real cute, it's not everyday you get to see someone do a Mr. Potato Head impression with their butt!

https://web.archive.org/web/20160804...y-draws-15000/

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're right about the Hillary health thing being overblown. Check this shit, it's reaching for sure.

Her being carried up the stairs was worthy of coverage tho. I think her obvious health problems/drug use deserve note; the fact that clickbait media and (((Breitbart))) run with it to silly degrees doesn't change that fact.

The amount of photoshop in those ads in the link is too damn high.


As for the potential speech limit, I'm not sure how well it would hold up in England's courts. Here, IN THIS COUNTRY, courts limit it to not causing immediate physical harm to those that would hear it (no yelling fire in a crowded theater) which is reasonable.