![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
![]() To the GM Staff of Project 1999:
I understand all of the hard work you've put in for this server to be what it is. Actually, I don't. And I sincerely doubt ANYONE here can fully understand the amount of work you have put in for well over a year on this project. I would like to think that everyone is grateful for your work, but as we have seen over the past 2+ months, some people don't care. There are your MacroQuesters, your Dupers, your two-boxers, your exploiters & cheaters. These individuals are specifically going against your wishes and destroying the integrity of the server. You have dealt with many of them, and some have been given second chances. However, some have not been dealt with. This is where the issue arises. If you would stop sticking your heads into the raid target situation, you could deal with factual evidence of people exploiting, server development, and maybe even have a moment or two of relaxation! Lets look at how this developed:
I don't understand why the rotation was such a priority. We had shown good faith when we dealt with Lady Vox during the DDOS. On the other hand, there has been documented proof presented of Allizia and Tibador exploiting after specifically being warned about the Phinny pull. Then, on top of that, not fixing an obviously broken Vox before they downed her. These issues have been brought to your attention as of one week ago today. A Whole week, and no repercussions. This is _sad_ when you consider the fact that we now have a 14 day MINIMUM ban hammer over our heads for handling raid targets in the classic manner. Rather than giving it time to play out and see where it would lead, we've had to watch the GM's waste huge amounts of their time developing a very poor rotation which we are forced to follow for fear of a 14 day ban. This is just causing more ungratefulness for the server, and even more complaints. Please focus on the server, the broken content, and those who are exploiting it rather than the guild drama that is extremely one sided. | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() Instead of moving otto's post without addressing it, can we take a minute and address these very valid concerns?
| ||
|
#3
|
||||||||||||
|
![]() -Timeline is missing the fact that IB also showed up to Nagafen 5 hours early and claimed Nagafen. Proving that they were willing to operate under the system as long as it benefited them.
-Timeline is missing the fact that IB also showed up to Nagafen after Trans had been there for 14 hours early. Also missing the fact that you guys decided that the system that you guys were operating under should no longer apply to you. Quote:
Quote:
The implementation of the rotation solved two issues: 1) No longer need to show up 14 hours in advance. 2) No longer afraid of another guild rushing your target and KSing you. The only way to get you guys to abide by these rules is with some form of leverage. That leverage was a 14-day ban. Ever since the rotation was announced, I have been very clear that we would be open to further suggestions and systems that people wanted to propose. Up until today the only suggestions we have really been told were, "Who ever engages first and does the most damage should get it!" Uhhh. Ya. No. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Want to know why the rotation was a priority? I have had a rather peaceful week and a half because there was no fighting over the spawns. There was no one asking me to come watch the raid and make sure nothing shady happened. I don't even know who has been killing what. That is how it should be. If it is FFA, it CAN'T be like that. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It is really getting old. You have a chance to get rid of the rotation. You have a chance to help develop a system that we feel is fair. Grasp that chance. Embrace it. Make it the best you can that emphasizes competition and fairness. | |||||||||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() It isn't just a "PVP server mentality" to want to compete. I wish you'd quit fucking saying that stupid shit.
| ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
[ANONYMOUS]
| |||
|
#6
|
|||
|
![]() Rotation is what has worked over MANY servers for MANY years. Other than selfishness and immaturity their is no reason to protest a rotation.
| ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() First to engage is what has worked over MANY servers for MANY years. Other than selfishness and immaturity their is no reason to protest a first to engage.
__________________
[ANONYMOUS]
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() You keep painting the picture as if we had an agreed set of rules as to *whoever gets their first* gets the first shot.
Once again, it was an idea, a framework. It was never agreed upon and I wish you'd stop painting the picture that way. You said, "-Timeline is missing the fact that IB also showed up to Nagafen after Trans had been there for 14 hours early. Also missing the fact that you guys decided that the system that you guys were operating under should no longer apply to you." You missed quit a bit there. Not only was that in my post (IE numbers 13 and 14), I had informed Allizia over 5 days before that naggy kill that we would not be following the framework we had started working on. You demean myself and my guild and our concerns and say we are missing all the facts. Don't get so high and mighty... you're missing them too. As far as the rotation fixing both the gripes, you are sorely mistaken. You stepped in the moment our first framework had failed. You didn't even give us the time to try out another solution. I had my qualms with first to engage to begin with as well, but the more I looked back at live, the more I realized it was and is the way things were intended to be. For some reason though we are stuck on this idea that it'll just be a massive zerg fest in which we can't police ourselves on the first to engage thing. On live this is exactly how it was. Guilds A, B, and C have their tracker locate a mob. Guild A and B mobilize instantly, C is late. Then, Guild A and B begin to buff. Guild A finishes first and engages. Guild B then has to wait, and C is just finally zoning in. Should Guild A wipe, Guild b gets a shot, if guild b wipes, then guild C (So long as they are prepared before guild A finishes their corpse run). Anything short of this is not live-like. If you truly feel you have to police us, put in variance and remove the rotation. You'll be proven wrong. | ||
|
#9
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
![]() SOLUTION-
GM's just wash your hands clean of any spawn competition. Why do you care anyway? So as long the spawns are not being exploited in any way it shouldn't really matter to you... Let the guilds duke it out, were all ADULTS, we don't need to be hand held. 100% of your time will be freed if you just walk away. Let it be FFA, let the spirit of the competition and game play it self out. No intervention is sometimes a good intervention. IMHO of course | ||
|
![]() |
|
|