Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2011, 04:52 AM
jjgerman jjgerman is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 414
Default Spell Damage/resists are F'ed

Spell damage is way too high vs resists

root/snare landing on people with 100-150 mr on a somewhat consistent basis.......


has nothing to do with classic pvp, not even close to it really


all these vztz people pretending they know what shit is suppose to be as far as resists go, need to stfu.


root/snare on live had a very slim chance to land at even around 75 mr


only thing this system will do is allow gang rape groups to be 100% successful.

because even with max classic resist gear, u will be getting snared, or rooted lol.......

just retarded
  #2  
Old 11-08-2011, 04:55 AM
Crazerous Crazerous is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 81
Default

agreed snare/root/STUN/blind need to all be 95% resisted at 120+ MR. and 85% at 100MR
  #3  
Old 11-08-2011, 04:57 AM
Darwoth2 Darwoth2 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjgerman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Spell damage is way too high vs resists
nope
  #4  
Old 11-08-2011, 05:02 AM
Crazerous Crazerous is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 81
Default

screw how hard spells are landing, i dont see whats so difficult in making root/snare/blind/stun pointless to cast when some1 reaches 120MR....i saw in another post that null had STUNS landing basicly 50% of the time on people with over 150MR .................. ????????? just fix the cc spells. then worry about partial nuke damage.
  #5  
Old 11-08-2011, 05:10 AM
Darwoth2 Darwoth2 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Default

snares/roots/blinds are resisting the majority of the time with decent mr, the only thing really being debated at this juncture by anyone with intelligence is slight tweaks to root/snare and the frequency of stuns landing.
  #6  
Old 11-08-2011, 05:15 AM
Lovely Lovely is offline
Fire Giant

Lovely's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 828
Default

This is been discussed 500 times already and you're talking out of your ass without knowing shit. Go back to your cave plez
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aruden View Post
lovely is the greatest thing that ever happened to red99. watching everyone rage is hilarious.
Quote:
exploit - is the code word for they outleveled me and are now outfarming me
  #7  
Old 11-08-2011, 06:01 AM
jjgerman jjgerman is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 414
Default lol

a wizard that wants high spell damage, and roots that stick on people, go figure


i know for a fact u didnt play classic era or early kunark pvp lovely, stop pretending like u know shit cuz u got a lvl 50 wiz on a test server.


roots/snares/stuns = useless at 120 + magic resist.
thats eq, dunno wtf game u played here on some shitty vztz garage box.
  #8  
Old 11-08-2011, 07:22 AM
Lovely Lovely is offline
Fire Giant

Lovely's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjgerman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
a wizard that wants high spell damage, and roots that stick on people, go figure


i know for a fact u didnt play classic era or early kunark pvp lovely, stop pretending like u know shit cuz u got a lvl 50 wiz on a test server.


roots/snares/stuns = useless at 120 + magic resist.
thats eq, dunno wtf game u played here on some shitty vztz garage box.
I don't have any interest in arguing with dumb people who obviously haven't followed these forums for more then a week. Since you don't seem to know a single thing about what the Developers have in mind for this server. So I'll just leave this sentence for you to read... --->

The developers doesn't want to have the same resist system as Everquest used in Classic and Early Kunark. It was total garbage and unbalanced. There you go.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aruden View Post
lovely is the greatest thing that ever happened to red99. watching everyone rage is hilarious.
Quote:
exploit - is the code word for they outleveled me and are now outfarming me
  #9  
Old 11-08-2011, 08:25 AM
Kelsar Kelsar is offline
Sarnak

Kelsar's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 229
Default

Lovely, I understand your sentence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] As a fellow wizard I can say us nuking for 896 damage is a bit too high and way out of balance. I haven't been around to test the resist rates much but the damage is a bit concerning. Does anyone know if the recent damage boost applies to dots as well? I generalized "spells".

Self buffed, without rune, I have 971 HP. Most casters will have similar base figures +/-100. Bards and Rogues will have slightly more. 896 damage is incredibly high for level 50 PvP. In the same context, the Druid dot Drifting Death took me to 23% in a single spell. I fear ebolt, if it's also increased from 60% to 80%, will be the absolute bane. If we're to deal with incredibly high damage spells, we should at least have the LoS check back in and not this shortened range/no LoS high dmg landing stuff.
  #10  
Old 11-08-2011, 08:34 AM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelsar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As a wizard I can say us nuking for 896 damage is a bit too high and way out of balance. If we're to deal with incredibly high damage spells, we should at least have the LoS check back in and not this shortened range/no LoS high dmg landing stuff.
Even some of the more logical WIZ's are admitting it.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.