progressive prioritization

[Blitzers]

"We didn't go after oil wells — actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls because we didn’t want to do environmental damage, and we didn’t want to destroy that infrastructure,” said former spy chief Michael Morell.

Full story here;

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/20...environmental/

Just worth the reminder.

[Swish]

I believe every word former spy chief Michael Morell said. Nothing to do with $$$

[iruinedyourday]

remind me of what the fuck you are talking about itt OP

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just worth the reminder.

A reminder that you are a Bush-0bama-Clinton shill? Do we really need the daily reminders?? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They don't bomb oilfields because it might scratch the billion worth in humvees they gave to isis. What do they need with oil when they gave them a billion to fund the isis army? And when they sent Stevens in to locate the stingers that had been given to them, he learned the truth, wouldn't play ball with the shadow-CIA's psyop, and was executed for it.

You can shove it, dude.

for everyone else not sold out to them:
https://youtu.be/eo2GYQxopbM
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/ra.../05/id/700840/
https://youtu.be/x0GrcQ9kXbI
https://youtu.be/d2WrwUM2RwI
https://youtu.be/3M7QV7-BV90
https://youtu.be/ItoJy1ouPaA
https://youtu.be/KgAN7qEQSvY?t=1853 (watch at least thru following segment)

[Lexical]

The actual reason they don't completely obliterate the oil fields is because, when you are in the business of nation building, you want to keep as much infrastructure intact as possible. This allows a steady and more seemless transition back into normal life-styles without more than a hiccup especially when you are looking at toppling a power structure in less than a week. Quite simple really, do it quick enough for the common person not to feel the affects of war, and let business continue as usual.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Lexical [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The actual reason they don't completely obliterate the oil fields is because, when you are in the business of nation building, you want to keep as much infrastructure intact as possible. This allows a steady and more seemless transition back into normal life-styles without more than a hiccup especially when you are looking at toppling a power structure in less than a week. Quite simple really, do it quick enough for the common person not to feel the affects of war, and let business continue as usual.

[insert buzzer sound here]
Nah they don't care about that. Oil is just a controlling mechanism. Don't think money, it's about power. Money is just a tool towards power for some. A poor man could rule the world, theoretically, but only through honesty. But the world doesn't want to be controlled through honesty, as it's not an honest world. But those that are rich are rich enough, it's only a matter for those yet to be rich, which are unwanted by the rich, or more specifically those that have obtained such power already. We can call those corpratists and technocrats, to them the oil is worthless, there is already enough.

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't think money, it's about power.....

Correct! And what better strangle hold on power is there but controlling the very government sent to dictate the wills of the people?

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Lexical [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Correct! And what better strangle hold on power is there but controlling the very government sent to dictate the wills of the people?

Yeah, or governments, as it's all coalitions and such (open and secret). But there is a controlling entity to it with long term regional and world plans and such, nothing new throughout history.

I view oil as just another pawn of it, a way to lead the masses to a regional control target, or an excuse to do so. Or to even deny others access to such resources. Cook some bacon and dangle it in front of a dog, you instantly gain full control, even lead it into striking distance or whatnot.

Might sound paranoid in some ways, all sorts of weird conspiracy theories around, but really they don't care about us, not as individuals. They just count on us to arrive on target at an appropriate time.

Now if they say nuked all those oil fields, turned them all to glass (nuked sand melts to glass, don't need big nukes, plugs the oil), they would lose control over the region, lose control over others. That's bad though, but I'm just saying why they would never do that.

I just wish we would put more into developing cold fusion reactors. There have been considerable breakthroughs, especially in quantum theory aspects. But the same put the funding into green energy programs which amount to nothing but make certain people rich from the fundings, and also retains power.