Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2010, 05:43 PM
yaeger yaeger is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 198
Default Spice it up!

I love the classic experience. I love the sense of adventure, excitement, and nostalgia of having a classic server.

That being said, I think we need to spice it up. Move outside of the purist classic sense, and move towards a 'classic experience'. Attempt to recreate the classic feeling of discovery and adventure. Re-learn how your class works and learning other classes, not just being able to google something and read everything about your class for the next 60 levels.

A couple ideas to consider:

1 - Move the high-profile items to like-level monsters every couple of months or so. Let people search for the items by clearing through dungeons again, rediscovering the loot tables. For example: instead of the FBSS dropping from the frenzied ghoul in LGuk, move it to a similar mob in Kedge, then after a month or two move it to a random like-level mob in Hate or Fear.

Periodically change the high-profile item locations so it'll keep the farmers and everyone else occupied for a while, create that classic-like secrecy when you find a nice drop, and stop the perma-camping.

2 - Tweak various classes. Now there's a lot of different opinions out there, but I feel that you Developers have a good idea of the relative strength and weakness of each class, and their role to play.

For example, I think everyone can agree that rangers are weak in Classic. Give them a minor tweak, something unique to Rangers to make them more attractive to groups and make them worth their -40% exp penalty. A small adjustment goes a long way.

It doesn't have to be anything big, but it'll go a long way towards giving the game that "Classic Feel" that we all experienced back in the day.
  #2  
Old 09-08-2010, 05:44 PM
Starklen Starklen is offline
Kobold

Starklen's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 193
Default

no
  #3  
Old 09-08-2010, 05:45 PM
Ponden Ponden is offline
Kobold

Ponden's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 194
Default

What the hell?
__________________
5 Troll Shaman
50 Dark Elf Enchanter
50 Old Halfling Rogue/Troll Shaman
65 Ogre Shaman
70 Erudite Paladin
85 Wood Elf Bard/Dark Elf Enchanter
  #4  
Old 09-08-2010, 05:46 PM
Dantes Dantes is offline
Fire Giant

Dantes's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 808
Default

Somebody goin' git verbally raped.
__________________
Dantes Infernus
57th Level Champion of Rallos Zek

"Life's short and hard like a body building elf."
  #5  
Old 09-08-2010, 05:53 PM
yaeger yaeger is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starklen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
no
No? Why no? No changes? No new experiences? No new challenges?

We call this a classic server. But it's not.

The mobs, graphics, and items are for the most part. Kudos to the devs. However, it's predicable. The standard on the server to pick one of 5 classes, shoot up to 50, and twink out a main. All the item drops and locations are known. All raid strategies are known.

None of this is classic, yet we do nothing. Let me give you an example:

In classic, groups would enter LGuk and clear the zone. In the beginning there were no known camps, no one knew what named were there, what PHers, what loot they dropped. They discovered it.

In P1999, people would find the 'best' class after going over multiple old forums and comparing to their experience. They'd race to LGuk, bypass all the existing content, and go directly to the named PHer and set up camp, knowing exactly how often the mob will spawn and how frequently the loot will drop.

Do you see the glaring difference?
  #6  
Old 09-08-2010, 05:58 PM
Tiggles Tiggles is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,693
Default

I'm a republican I hate change.
  #7  
Old 09-08-2010, 07:23 PM
Qaedain Qaedain is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 381
Send a message via ICQ to Qaedain Send a message via AIM to Qaedain Send a message via MSN to Qaedain
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaeger [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Do you see the glaring difference?
Yes, but there is no reason why this has to compromise the goal of recreating classic EverQuest, which your ideas do not harmonize with.
__________________
Live: [67 Arch Convoker] Qaedain Magi'kot (High Elf)
P'99: [50 Magician] Qaedain (High Elf)
  #8  
Old 09-08-2010, 07:29 PM
yaeger yaeger is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qaedain [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, but there is no reason why this has to compromise the goal of recreating classic EverQuest, which your ideas do not harmonize with.
I don't understand why it all-of-a-sudden becomes non-classic if we shuffle the loot around some. It's still all there, it's still the same, it'll sell for the same.

It will create a challenge that was present during the Classic era that is NOT here in P1999.
  #9  
Old 09-08-2010, 07:36 PM
Toony Toony is offline
Kobold

Toony's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 195
Default

pass
  #10  
Old 09-08-2010, 07:44 PM
yaeger yaeger is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toony [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
pass
Could you provide a little more feedback as to why you think any of the ideas are bad?

Posting one word statements doesn't help one way or the other.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.