Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > PvP Bugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2014, 01:29 AM
no chewie dont no chewie dont is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: the cut
Posts: 635
Default Slam

slam (possibly bash too) seems not to work right after last patch
thought it was my imagination the first few times but here it is
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
(no, neefin is not an ogre)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2014, 01:44 AM
Colgate Colgate is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,145
Default

UI looks classic enough to me
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2014, 07:03 AM
Cid Cid is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 145
Default

You are correct, Neefin is not an ogre. I do not have any ogres because I hate the forced ducking.

Slam might be messed up, but I happened to be looking right where you logged in so you had like 4 seconds to see me, target me, run up to me and attack. If it missed, it just missed. You only had time to get a single double-attack off on me from what I could see, so there wasn't time for more than one chance at slam, and it's not guaranteed.
It's very unlikely you could have killed me anyway, I was expecting someone to pop in.

As for bash, a couple of people I was grouped with earlier were testing it out and from what they said, bash had a high success rate on the other person of the same level. I am not sure if it was interrupting spells, but it was doing dmg.

I can't load the pic so I assume slam hit me for 1dmg but didn't interrupt gate. It might actually be a delay from my client on my shitty net. I had two Tstaff monks on Cid once, Wanyo and someone else in KC, and I managed to get gate off but when I landed Wanyo sent me a tell saying his Tstaff procced on me on his screen, but it never happened on mine. Nor did I have the stun when I landed.

Because my net is so slow it may leave something like a ghost image of me there for an instant when on my clientside the spell has successfully cast.

P.S. If you think it gives me some advantage, there is no advantage to having dialup except getting to say you are all spoiled bitches and I'm the only one on "Classic" internet. =P
__________________

Cidisius - 60 Shaman (Max Alchemy)
Neefin - 60 Druid
Yawgmoth - 60 Necromancer (184 Research)
Colt - 56 Magician (184 Research)
Hannibal - 55 Monk
Urza - 53 Wizard (175 Research)
Dealer - 47 Enchanter (250 Jewelcrafting, 165 Research)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2014, 12:10 PM
Bamz4l Bamz4l is offline
Sarnak

Bamz4l's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 490
Default

1 - u can disable auto-duck, and that's the first thing u should do....
2 - ya bash/slam used to interrupt mid-cast, none of this "let me see if I can finsh the cast" type shit. No, it would literally end the spell and put you in a very brief stun lock. the whole "regains concentration and continued casting" part should never even occur because the casting should have ended upon bash/slam landing.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2014, 02:09 PM
Yumyums Inmahtumtums Yumyums Inmahtumtums is offline
Planar Protector

Yumyums Inmahtumtums's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bamz4l [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
1 - u can disable auto-duck, and that's the first thing u should do....
2 - ya bash/slam used to interrupt mid-cast, none of this "let me see if I can finsh the cast" type shit. No, it would literally end the spell and put you in a very brief stun lock. the whole "regains concentration and continued casting" part should never even occur because the casting should have ended upon bash/slam landing.
__________________

Yumyums Inmahtumtums - 59 Shaman
Lemonspoon Icebeaner - 52 Enchanter
Yumyums Inmahtumtums - 60 Enchanter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-30-2014, 04:20 PM
no chewie dont no chewie dont is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: the cut
Posts: 635
Default

Bash and or slam interupts cast on successful hit, even if it hits a rune
used to I mean
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-30-2014, 08:33 PM
Alunova Alunova is offline
Developer


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 545
Default

Should interrupt only if that person has access to the bash skill.

In classic, iirc, slam was limited to 1 damage and a very small chance to interrupt unless that person also had skill in bash, which would increase the damage and stun ability of slam equally.

Shamans for example would never bash for more than 1 damage, with a very high miss rate and very low stun chance, even at 60.
Last edited by Alunova; 05-30-2014 at 08:35 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-30-2014, 09:09 PM
BlkCamel BlkCamel is offline
Sarnak

BlkCamel's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 425
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alunova [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Should interrupt only if that person has access to the bash skill.

In classic, iirc, slam was limited to 1 damage and a very small chance to interrupt unless that person also had skill in bash, which would increase the damage and stun ability of slam equally.

Shamans for example would never bash for more than 1 damage, with a very high miss rate and very low stun chance, even at 60.
Shaman on live 99-06 and can attest that Bash is only 1 damage for non-native classes (or racial only bash). I agree that it had a high miss rate even at level 60, but from my memory a landing bash ALWAYS interrupted the cast, and in the way stated above by stopping the cast immediately. Most of the time the mob would immediately (after swing due to mob auto-attack) and usually try to recast the spell.

By having it work the way it does now, allowing caster to finish casting is allowing people more chances to attempt bash on monsters and reducing the potential # of casts a mob will make (whether successful or not). I don't know if that last bit made sense but what I am trying to say is, mobs are easier if allowed to continue casting even if that cast has a chance to re-gain concentration.


***Like to add that I believe mobs immune to stun were also immune to the interrupt effects of a bash, even if landed.
__________________
Last edited by BlkCamel; 05-30-2014 at 09:11 PM.. Reason: ***
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-30-2014, 11:57 PM
no chewie dont no chewie dont is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: the cut
Posts: 635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlkCamel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

By having it work the way it does now, allowing caster to finish casting is allowing people more chances to attempt bash on monsters and reducing the potential # of casts a mob will make (whether successful or not). I don't know if that last bit made sense but what I am trying to say is, mobs are easier if allowed to continue casting even if that cast has a chance to re-gain concentration.


***Like to add that I believe mobs immune to stun were also immune to the interrupt effects of a bash, even if landed.
good point i wasn't even thinking of this part
so its not just me, bash stopped working right?
Last edited by no chewie dont; 05-31-2014 at 12:17 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-31-2014, 09:29 AM
LostCause LostCause is offline
Fire Giant

LostCause's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 800
Default

ive noticed on this server if the spell is about to go off like .5 secs or less and you bash you still get the spell off.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.