As per DePerno, a 68.05% error rate was assigned to Dominion Voting machines such that "68.05% of the ballots are sent for bulk adjudication or are collected and kept in a folder--"sent somewhere where people in another location can change the votes."
DePerno explained to the Gateway Pundit that "the vote flipped based on the algorithm. It can be done manually or through a machine." This is "either a function of the program or it's done offsite" and "then sent back to the system" after it was adjudicated "or it was done internally in the program."
This proves that the alleged glitches of vote flipping that were discovered during the hearing of the Trump legal team with state legislators and whistleblowers were not human error but machine errors.
In addition, DePerno raised that the machines' systematic programming is designed to actually "generate errors that affect the outcome of the election" since it was "meticulously created to do exactly what it did". He said this was not done by amateurs but by "a major software company or foreign entity".
"This violates all cybersecurity protocols. It doesn't matter who you vote for. No one can be confident that with a 68.05% error rate that your ballot was not mass adjudicated," he said.
Allied's forensic report was actually conducted by a team of experts and professionals such as Harvard University MBA holder Russel James Ramsland, Jr. who previously worked for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Thus, the forensic results are credible.
|