Quote:
Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Socialism is very specific dude(control of the means of production by the state). You are just showing how full of BS you are. Im not a moron like you so I dont think in simplistic terms of 1 single enemy working alone attacking the US. Starting to doubt you were in the military at this point. Who cares about militarys. Rome wasnt defeated by a military it was defeated by importation of immigrants and over extension of its military,political infighting, and economic disaster caused by slavery.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Says we dont need military spending because no one will attack us.
|
Seems you care about the militarys?
So you retract your statement then? Please explain a realistic scenario where a "league of nations" attacks the USA. I'm waiting although it seems obvious you don't want to answer my question with your sidestep there at the end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lune
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's actually not. Socialism exists along a spectrum just like capitalism. You probably deride Denmark, Japan, or Canada for being so "socialist", but do the workers own the means of production there? No. So you'd be using the term wrong too when people in the US want some of the concepts they have going in these places and you call them socialist.
|
But Rush Limbaugh told me different!?!??!