Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, and this is the way it works in real life.
If you have 2 people on trial for theft, one with a clean record, and one with multiple convictions, the guy with multiple convictions is going to jail and the guy with a clean record is probably getting a fine.
Not commenting on Tune's situation in particular, but this response by Supreme makes no sense.
|
If 2 people are on trial for theft that means that a grand jury felt there was sufficient evidence for the charge of theft to go to trial for BOTH defendants.
Punishment is not discretionary or arbitrary unless the defendants plea agreement specifies an alternative. Typically if you have committed a felonious act and have been found guilty by a jury of your peers the punishment is mandated by statutes.
The matter of guilt and punishment based on previous guilt or convictions will likely end up in appeals. As the decisions of guilt was not based on presented evidence for the current charge but bias because of previous history.
Ergo Witch Trial..where speculation, half truths and rumor mongering led to the deaths of women without due process or appeal.
Therefore what we have going on is a clear attempt by a biased judiciary to eliminate specific players to promote their own agenda.
Yes i know it may be hard for you to follow...but if you actually took the time to understand how the American Judicial system worked then your understanding of the logic behind its design would be clear.