| nerfed |
11-02-2011 02:35 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bkab
(Post 452172)
Yea, Slayer and Nerfed didn't follow Null's instructions yesterday while we were testing ac/atk at all. /facepalm
|
Hey idiot you realize he was testing different scenarios right? The only thing I didn't follow was where to post it because of misinformation.
Quote:
this is such a fucking stupid test, you decreased the rangers attack rating as you increased the clerics armor rating. You didnt even alter the clerics attack rating or armor in either fight so of course he hits for the same in each fight, which lends the question, why the fuck are you spamming up your logs with your cleric hitting the ranger? We know clerics hit for less than rangers, their god damn skill caps dont go to 210 like rangers you newb.
So instead of an independent variable with clearly defined goals in your test, you leave a mishmash of fucking autoattacks from both toons with no isolated stats, you changed attack rating AND armor so we don't know which stat is effecting the rangers damage.
Nerfed - 50 cleric (634 armor 759 attack )
Slayer - 50 ranger (719 armor and 1073 attack)
Nerfed - 50 cleric (717 armor 759 attack )
Slayer - 50 ranger (719 armor and 909 attack)
|
The 2nd set clearly wasn't about the clerics damage. Re-read null's post.
Quote:
All that it needs to show is that the ranger (or rogue or warrior in the other logs) were getting an increase in damage output from large differences in AC and ATK.
|
|
