Log in

View Full Version : Thanks TMO


Eccezan
09-25-2012, 01:45 AM
http://i.imgur.com/HSBTh.jpg

Anger
09-25-2012, 01:50 AM
I dont get it.

Oh and uhh fuck NFL scab refs and such.

Jacquouille
09-25-2012, 02:31 AM
Get a life eccezan =)

Alarti0001
09-25-2012, 02:39 AM
Get a life eccezan =)

You are on here as much or more than him... and you only have 6 posts outside of RnF

Sirken
09-25-2012, 03:57 AM
i would ban Green Bay if i could.

all of it.

i doubt it would take very long.

Tarathiel
09-25-2012, 04:45 AM
thanks tmo!

arsenalpow
09-25-2012, 05:24 AM
Hahahahahahaha

Daldolma
09-25-2012, 08:01 AM
professional sports confirmed tool of reptilian overlords to keep the masses in check

Tasslehofp99
09-25-2012, 09:11 AM
Uh how is that not a touchdown? I've seen this play atleast 5 times in the last 10 years, 2 players come down with a ball (simultaneous posession) and the offensive player always wins. You can see Golden Tate's hand on the inside of Green Bay's defenders arms which are already closing down on the ball, isn't much to argue about here...regular referees would have made the same call 99.9% of the time in that same situation.

Raavak
09-25-2012, 10:06 AM
And Tate friggen blatantly shoved Shields to the ground before the interception. Where's the offensive pass interference?

Yes, I'm a Packer fan.

Xanthias
09-25-2012, 11:04 AM
Uh how is that not a touchdown? I've seen this play atleast 5 times in the last 10 years, 2 players come down with a ball (simultaneous posession) and the offensive player always wins. You can see Golden Tate's hand on the inside of Green Bay's defenders arms which are already closing down on the ball, isn't much to argue about here...regular referees would have made the same call 99.9% of the time in that same situation.

Not a fan of either, however, it isn't simultaneous possession when one player has the ball completely against their body and the second player only has an arm on it.

Xanthias
09-25-2012, 11:05 AM
I wonder if this was their coversation...

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/576978_4548004861827_519408671_n.jpg

radditsu
09-25-2012, 11:30 AM
What was the spread of this game? Seahawks +3.5? And they were losing by 5? It looks like it shifted 150 million fucking dollars in bets according to ESPN. I am not saying this is what happened, but this is the same crew that fucked up the end of that redskins-rams game. If i was some shithole scab who gets paid 1/3rd of what the real refs get paid. Maybe I pull something that NBA ref got nailed for a few years ago.

Aicha
09-25-2012, 11:34 AM
Chest, you're a meme now!

Metallikus
09-25-2012, 01:18 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsZU8YPRrW4

Transcript from interview by TMO's Fistasaurus (aka Golden Tate) concerning raid interference in fear:

GM: "take me thru that last play, what happened in fear today"

Fist: "BDA was in fear pulling draco, but we are TMO, so we zoned in, I ran a grandma route to the north gaining agro on several mobs and brought them to north wall raid force, and i just competed, we compete, it's never over, we just keep competing."

GM: "Did you train BDA?"

Fist: "I don't know what you talkin bout.

I don't know what you talkin bout.

I didn't hear any whistles, so its good"

GM: "Why did you bring 30 mobs to BDA camp and FD before their puller brought draco in"

Fist: "I'm unaware of the rule, I don't know what the rule is, I don't know why BDA thinks that was wrong"

quido
09-25-2012, 01:29 PM
lolz

Safon
09-25-2012, 01:52 PM
What do people find so enthralling about watching other people play sports?

Clark
09-25-2012, 01:54 PM
Uh how is that not a touchdown? I've seen this play atleast 5 times in the last 10 years, 2 players come down with a ball (simultaneous posession) and the offensive player always wins. You can see Golden Tate's hand on the inside of Green Bay's defenders arms which are already closing down on the ball, isn't much to argue about here...regular referees would have made the same call 99.9% of the time in that same situation.

Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, Item 5 states:

Simultaneous Catch. If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers.

It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control. If the ball is muffed after simultaneous touching by two such players, all the players of the passing team become eligible to catch the loose ball.

That is why it was a bad call- The second situation is what occurred :cool: However, I'm not a Greenbay Packers fan or a Seattle fan so it didn't really affect me. Was another terrible call to add to the list though that the replacements have made and is an embarassment to the league. :D

Tarathiel
09-25-2012, 02:39 PM
arguing over football is almost as retarded as arguing over a video game

Alarti0001
09-25-2012, 02:40 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsZU8YPRrW4

Transcript from interview by TMO's Fistasaurus (aka Golden Tate) concerning raid interference in fear:

GM: "take me thru that last play, what happened in fear today"

Fist: "BDA was in fear pulling draco, but we are TMO, so we zoned in, I ran a grandma route to the north gaining agro on several mobs and brought them to north wall raid force, and i just competed, we compete, it's never over, we just keep competing."

GM: "Did you train BDA?"

Fist: "I don't know what you talkin bout.

I don't know what you talkin bout.

I didn't hear any whistles, so its good"

GM: "Why did you bring 30 mobs to BDA camp and FD before their puller brought draco in"

Fist: "I'm unaware of the rule, I don't know what the rule is, I don't know why BDA thinks that was wrong"

de·lu·sion·al  [dih-loo-zhuh-nl] Show IPA
adjective
1.
having false or unrealistic beliefs or opinions: Senators who think they will get agreement on a comprehensive tax bill are delusional.
2.
Psychiatry . maintaining fixed false beliefs even when confronted with facts, usually as a result of mental illness: He was so delusional and paranoid that he thought everybody was conspiring against him.

<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C4ma7JblsMU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C4ma7JblsMU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

Tarathiel
09-25-2012, 02:46 PM
de·lu·sion·al  [dih-loo-zhuh-nl] Show IPA
adjective
1.
having false or unrealistic beliefs or opinions: Senators who think they will get agreement on a comprehensive tax bill are delusional.
2.
Psychiatry . maintaining fixed false beliefs even when confronted with facts, usually as a result of mental illness: He was so delusional and paranoid that he thought everybody was conspiring against him.

<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C4ma7JblsMU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C4ma7JblsMU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

o·bese  [oh-bees]
adjective
very fat or overweight; corpulent.

Alarti0001
09-25-2012, 03:31 PM
o·bese  [oh-bees]
adjective
very fat or overweight; corpulent.

proj·ect   [n. proj-ekt, -ikt; v. pruh-jekt] Show IPA
verb (used without object) pro·ject
21.
Psychology . to ascribe one's own feelings, thoughts, or attitudes to others.


This is fun! However, what about that video demonstrates obesity? Play better !

Autotune
09-25-2012, 04:10 PM
That train fraps is so funny, fail monks come into camp and bring all their aggro with them.

You can tell because it kills 2 bda monks first without having to go into seek mode.

Your monks are so awesome, probably grouped with buffers, hell I bet you guys even group them with bards.

deneauth
09-25-2012, 04:14 PM
2012th month of the 19th day of the 18th year? Learn to date American, fuck yeah!

Yajirobe Yajipants
09-25-2012, 06:39 PM
This thread is amazing.

Eccezan
09-25-2012, 06:54 PM
This thread is amazing.

http://assets.diylol.com/hfs/949/ac9/58e/resized/lolwut-meme-generator-amazing-threads-is-amazing-1c9d35.jpg?1348613638.jpg

Tasslehofp99
09-25-2012, 08:19 PM
Look very closely at the replay, golden tate's left arm comes in underneath the packer's defenders arms, between the ball and the defender's chest. Technically this would be considered simultaneous posession; tate had his hands around the ball in such a manner that if the defender didn't also have his hands on it..tate would've come down with the catch anyway. People/the sports media just love to QQ whenever something like this happens to the packers/patriots, or america's sweetheart teams. Seriously this SAME exact thing happened to the jets last year cromartie caught a pick but the receiver came down with his hands on the ball as well...same ruling, offensive player got the catch.

Safon
09-25-2012, 08:22 PM
arguing over football is almost as retarded as arguing over a video game

qft

chief
09-25-2012, 10:26 PM
lol at that fraps, atleast you caught the culprit who trained you hahahahahaha

Autotune
09-25-2012, 10:58 PM
lol at that fraps, atleast you caught the culprit who trained you hahahahahaha

wonder if him and his guild got raid suspended. Training is a serious crime with serious time.

Servellious
09-25-2012, 11:03 PM
Wonder if autotune has ever been laid, most likely not.

Halfelfbard
09-26-2012, 12:58 AM
If i saw one of them refs, i'd try to break their neck. Atleast hot glue some glasses to there head.

MooseTX82
09-26-2012, 02:00 AM
Look very closely at the replay, golden tate's left arm comes in underneath the packer's defenders arms, between the ball and the defender's chest. Technically this would be considered simultaneous posession; tate had his hands around the ball in such a manner that if the defender didn't also have his hands on it..tate would've come down with the catch anyway. People/the sports media just love to QQ whenever something like this happens to the packers/patriots, or america's sweetheart teams. Seriously this SAME exact thing happened to the jets last year cromartie caught a pick but the receiver came down with his hands on the ball as well...same ruling, offensive player got the catch.

Couldn't be more wrong. It's not possession if you have 1 hand on it as its secure to the defenders chest who's feet are on the ground completing a "football" move.
No TD. INT. blown call. 100%

MooseTX82
09-26-2012, 02:04 AM
It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control. If the ball is muffed after simultaneous touching by two such players, all the players of the passing team become eligible to catch the loose ball.

What is so hard to understand about this?

Hasbinlulz
09-26-2012, 02:25 AM
If i saw one of them refs, i'd try to break their neck. Atleast hot glue some glasses to there head.
With quality posts like this, is it any wonder the rubbish has left p99, leaving only the best and brightest?

Hasbinlulz
09-26-2012, 02:26 AM
What is so hard to understand about this?
Why you think anyone cares.

Triangle
09-26-2012, 02:47 AM
With quality posts like this, is it any wonder the rubbish has left p99, leaving only the best and brightest?

Really its not the refs fault, they are not qualified. The NFL is to blame for not making sure its league has the best refs available. What a freaking circus... in fact the people are to blame because despite the nfl not providing good refs, the people still see these games in person paying big time money or watching them on tv with 3000 commercials.

xarzzardorn
09-26-2012, 04:12 AM
than,ks

Happyfeet
09-26-2012, 04:20 AM
http://i.imgur.com/tG75e.jpg

quido
09-26-2012, 04:48 AM
Hasbinbad, let's see you say something really smart about football.

Tasslehofp99
09-26-2012, 06:15 AM
http://i.imgur.com/tG75e.jpg

lol

Chippy
09-26-2012, 09:26 AM
Happyfeet wins.

Ferok
09-26-2012, 09:57 AM
Couldn't be more wrong. It's not possession if you have 1 hand on it as its secure to the defenders chest who's feet are on the ground completing a "football" move.
No TD. INT. blown call. 100%

The 'catch' isn't complete until the player goes to the ground in this case. Both had two hands on it when they went to the ground, so I think dual possession applies.

MooseTX82
09-26-2012, 10:20 AM
The 'catch' isn't complete until the player goes to the ground in this case. Both had two hands on it when they went to the ground, so I think dual possession applies.

Look at it again. Jennings has 2 hands on the ball clutched against his chest with 2 feet on the ground. Tate has 1 hand on the ball against Jennings chest. You tell me who qualifies as having possession FIRST, which is what matters.

Thana8088
09-26-2012, 10:25 AM
Look at it again. Jennings has 2 hands on the ball clutched against his chest with 2 feet on the ground. Tate has 1 hand on the ball against Jennings chest. You tell me who qualifies as having possession FIRST, which is what matters.

What horrible refs; I mean that really sounds like traveling.

Orruar
09-26-2012, 11:16 AM
Jennings caught the ball, Tate caught Jennings. Therefore Tate caught the ball by the rule of composition.

Ferok
09-26-2012, 11:38 AM
Look at it again. Jennings has 2 hands on the ball clutched against his chest with 2 feet on the ground. Tate has 1 hand on the ball against Jennings chest. You tell me who qualifies as having possession FIRST, which is what matters.

I don't see that at all. Looks to me like they're both fighting for possession all the way to the ground. Jennings doesn't get both feet down until Tate has touched the ball 2 or 3 times with his right hand (his left hand obscured beneath the ball from most angles).

There's nothing I see in the replay that would overturn it either way, I think whichever call was on the field would have stood under further review.

Autotune
09-26-2012, 12:18 PM
Wonder if autotune has ever been laid, most likely not.

My sex life doesn't need you worrying about it, if anything, you should probably be worrying about yours... or have you come to the realization that it's a lost cause?

Don't worry, i'm sure some dude one day will get drunk enough at that bar you visit to finally want to shove his cock in you, hell if you live in auburn it might be me.

Chokan
09-26-2012, 12:45 PM
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/715/inttd.png/

Chokan
09-26-2012, 12:47 PM
http://s13.postimage.org/pfr72gfmv/INTTD.png

hatelore
09-26-2012, 01:16 PM
My sex life doesn't need you worrying about it, if anything, you should probably be worrying about yours... or have you come to the realization that it's a lost cause?

Don't worry, i'm sure some dude one day will get drunk enough at that bar you visit to finally want to shove his cock in you, hell if you live in auburn it might be me.
All of your retorts make you seem as if you are in the age range of 14-16. What do you do when you walk away from your computer after making a childish post like that? Do you feel enlightened in some way? Do you feel smart or clever? You make others(or at least me) feel as if you are lacking... Somewhere...

radditsu
09-26-2012, 01:20 PM
All of your retorts make you seem as if you are in the age range of 14-16. What do you do when you walk away from your computer after making a childish post like that? Do you feel enlightened in some way? Do you feel smart or clever? You make others(or at least me) feel as if you are lacking... Somewhere...

He's trying to say you have no penis.

Servellious
09-26-2012, 01:28 PM
My sex life doesn't need you worrying about it, if anything, you should probably be worrying about yours... or have you come to the realization that it's a lost cause?

Don't worry, i'm sure some dude one day will get drunk enough at that bar you visit to finally want to shove his cock in you, hell if you live in auburn it might be me.


I do worry cause you spend so time on this forum maybe if you put that energy into talking to women you might possibly get laid then calm the fuck down and stop posting so much

Or stay a virgin forum warrior to the bitter end.

Alarti0001
09-26-2012, 02:07 PM
I do worry cause you spend so time on this forum maybe if you put that energy into talking to women you might possibly get laid then calm the fuck down and stop posting so much

Or stay a virgin forum warrior to the bitter end.

you two should date.

quido
09-26-2012, 02:12 PM
Watching football is boring anyways.

Autotune
09-26-2012, 02:28 PM
All of your retorts make you seem as if you are in the age range of 14-16. What do you do when you walk away from your computer after making a childish post like that? Do you feel enlightened in some way? Do you feel smart or clever? You make others(or at least me) feel as if you are lacking... Somewhere...

I think you're in love with Servellious, does she know? I bet she does now that you're white knightin!

I do worry cause you spend so time on this forum maybe if you put that energy into talking to women you might possibly get laid then calm the fuck down and stop posting so much

Or stay a virgin forum warrior to the bitter end.

Ah, yes. Nearly 2 posts a day = soo much time on this forum.

Also, I'm not going to stick my dick in you unless I'm really drunk. You're going to have to send me slutty sexts first too.

Safon
09-26-2012, 02:32 PM
I think you're in love with Servellious, does she know? I bet she does now that you're white knightin!



Ah, yes. Nearly 2 posts a day = soo much time on this forum.

Also, I'm not going to stick my dick in you unless I'm really drunk. You're going to have to send me slutty sexts first too.

You better not actually be redneck Autotune, I thought you were chill

Autotune
09-26-2012, 02:38 PM
You better not actually be redneck Autotune, I thought you were chill

I live in Alabama, by technicality, I am redneck. However, in Alabama, I am not technically a redneck.

I'm just a regular ol' college town bar sniper, who was brought into the world of mmorpg's by his cousins and got hooked on it like a project chick on crack.

Orruar
09-26-2012, 03:24 PM
Thread successfully derailed. Much like when the NFL announced that the call was wrong because it was pass interference, while not admitting the simultaneous possession ruling was a horrible call.

bizzum
09-26-2012, 03:57 PM
This thread got as boring as most Lions games in the 3rd quarter.

Raavak
09-26-2012, 05:26 PM
Lingerie League (http://www.mtv.com/photos/lingerie-football-league-in-between-plays/1676783/6813074/photo.jhtml#6813074)

Anger
09-26-2012, 06:08 PM
Let's get back to the issue at hand here.

The Pack got robbed, plain and simple.

Tasslehofp99
09-26-2012, 06:17 PM
Look at it again. Jennings has 2 hands on the ball clutched against his chest with 2 feet on the ground. Tate has 1 hand on the ball against Jennings chest. You tell me who qualifies as having possession FIRST, which is what matters.

Wrong, Tate touched the ball almost simultaneously with his left hand as jennings made the interception. Now, you can see the ball IS NOT touching jennings' chest yet, but tate has his left hand inside between his chest and the ball, and his right hand closing over the outside of the ball. At this point they both have posession, and the catch by both has to be maintained through them falling to the ground...which happened. Its not as complicated as everyone is making it, it WAS simultaneous posession...and the rule states that the offensive players wins posession in that case. Why is this still up for discussion world wide? lol does anyone else watch football unless the packers or patriots are playing? I've seen this hundreds of times before as I'm sure any other football fan has, plays out the same way everytime.

Anger
09-26-2012, 07:13 PM
Wrong, Tate touched the ball almost simultaneously with his left hand as jennings made the interception. Now, you can see the ball IS NOT touching jennings' chest yet, but tate has his left hand inside between his chest and the ball, and his right hand closing over the outside of the ball. At this point they both have posession, and the catch by both has to be maintained through them falling to the ground...which happened. Its not as complicated as everyone is making it, it WAS simultaneous posession...and the rule states that the offensive players wins posession in that case. Why is this still up for discussion world wide? lol does anyone else watch football unless the packers or patriots are playing? I've seen this hundreds of times before as I'm sure any other football fan has, plays out the same way everytime.

Offensive pass interference should have negated the entire play in the first place.

feanan
09-26-2012, 09:39 PM
who cares, fuck the packers. too late for debate now

Ferok
09-26-2012, 10:21 PM
Offensive pass interference should have negated the entire play in the first place.

With the benefit of video replay and multiple angles the pass interference is pretty clear. Given the scrum of 5 players jumping for the ball, and the speed of the game, it'd be horrible to call it there. The official would essentially be guessing, and there's about 6 other things he's gotta be looking at.

Jburks8
09-27-2012, 02:08 AM
It was definitely a closer call than I originally thought (due to the whole simultaneous catch and they need definitive evidence to overturn the call on the field), etc., but Tasselhoff, you need to consider the fact that literally all the NFL experts and players/coaches/retired refs around the league (minus Pete Carroll) thought that it was an interception.

Not to mention the fact that coincidentally there was a resolution with the old refs and the NFL within 3 days of the incident... Just seems like they knew they busted the call, they knew that that everyone knew that they busted the call, and that there would almost be a riot if something wasn't done to resolve it.

Now we can all go back to enjoying our Sundays without anarchy!

quido
09-27-2012, 02:31 AM
Wrong, Tate touched the ball ....

Any chance this guy's first name is Richard?

Jacquouille
09-27-2012, 03:00 AM
ITT: ppl worrying about Stealin's sexual life. Wtf ?

Where is all the eq flame, tmo =hitler etc so I can call you nerds !

Jacquouille
09-27-2012, 03:01 AM
Jeremy changed his avatar ? Wtf is going on ?

quido
09-27-2012, 03:01 AM
You are a dick tater.

Tasslehofp99
09-27-2012, 04:23 AM
It was definitely a closer call than I originally thought (due to the whole simultaneous catch and they need definitive evidence to overturn the call on the field), etc., but Tasselhoff, you need to consider the fact that literally all the NFL experts and players/coaches/retired refs around the league (minus Pete Carroll) thought that it was an interception.

Not to mention the fact that coincidentally there was a resolution with the old refs and the NFL within 3 days of the incident... Just seems like they knew they busted the call, they knew that that everyone knew that they busted the call, and that there would almost be a riot if something wasn't done to resolve it.

Now we can all go back to enjoying our Sundays without anarchy!

It was an interception, but at the same time it was a catch. The offensive pass interference WAS obvious, but it is RARELY if ever called in a hail mary pass situation like that. Yep, glad the real refs are back...cause there were certainly bad calls being made, I just don't necessarily think the real referees would have made that packers/seattle call any differently then the "scabs".

baramur
09-28-2012, 02:30 AM
In order for sim. Catch oth players must have BOTH hands on the ball, to attain possession. The offensive player had only 1 hand in contact while the defensive player had 2, giving him possession. Whoever has possession is then down by contact when landing, it was an interception. Sim possession never occurs. Because the defensive player had FULL possession first.

Tasslehofp99
09-28-2012, 03:25 AM
In order for sim. Catch oth players must have BOTH hands on the ball, to attain possession. The offensive player had only 1 hand in contact while the defensive player had 2, giving him possession. Whoever has possession is then down by contact when landing, it was an interception. Sim possession never occurs. Because the defensive player had FULL possession first.

Nope, offensive player had 2 hands on the ball. You just can't see his hand underneath the ball clenched between the defender's chest and the football.

Tasslehofp99
09-28-2012, 03:26 AM
Also -- whoever has posession first matters very little most times.

Jacquouille
09-28-2012, 05:50 AM
That train fraps is so funny, fail monks come into camp and bring all their aggro with them.

You can tell because it kills 2 bda monks first without having to go into seek mode.

Your monks are so awesome, probably grouped with buffers, hell I bet you guys even group them with bards.

Lol, truth.

Tbh, TMO is so used to raiding/organized/experienced (with a core of madbadfat tools who surprisingly are still not bored to death), BDA a semi casual guild that has nearly 0 organization, 20% of the experience TMO has....

David vs Goliath =(

Heebo
09-28-2012, 11:33 AM
You are a dick tater.

dicktater.net hasn't seen an update in days - deleting from favorites

Heebo
09-28-2012, 11:34 AM
dicktaters.net*

runlvlzero
09-30-2012, 09:40 PM
TMO plz drive more poeple to red so we can gank them more, thanks.

BigSlip
09-30-2012, 09:44 PM
amen