View Full Version : Still No Word?
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-12-2025, 09:52 AM
I keep coming back every so often for word of a new server launch.
I know they are still active behind the scenes. They turned on bonuses for July 4th.
The last player posting on the communications sticky at the top of the page was in May 2024. Looked like the last posting from any P99 team member was October 2019.
Should I stop holding my breath? I keep passing out waiting.
Ransurian
07-12-2025, 12:44 PM
Green was always intended to be the finished product while Blue essentially served as a trial run / development server prior to Green’s release. There won’t be a new server because Green is the fulfillment of the original vision. It’s mission accomplished at this point. Simple as that.
If you want a fresh experience, start up an alt and don’t put 200k into it to trivialize the content.
loramin
07-12-2025, 01:32 PM
If you just want confirmation that Green 2.0 is coming, go read the bug forum. You can see they are fixing things which could only matter on a future Green 2.0 server (eg. fixing content that is already out-of-era).
However, while it's true that Green 2.0 is coming, the staff operates on their own, very slow timeline; breath holding is ill-advised.
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-12-2025, 07:23 PM
Green was always intended to be the finished product..
Then why do they keep pushing patches for Green?
Some of those patches remove content from the game prior to a certain month and year. Those mainly include the first 12 months the game was out, yet the game is at the end of Velious.
Do these particular patches from June 1st 2025 make any sense to you?
Nilbog: Lord Soptyvr no longer spawns until [Feb2000]
Nilbog: Thadres Thyme will not spawn until [Jul1999]
Nilbog: Redwind and icy orcs do not spawn until [Oct1999]
Nilbog: 'Leuz's Task' is not available until [Apr2001].
Nilbog: 'Necromancer Words' quests now work. Quest givers do not spawn until [Jul1999]
Nilbog: Martar Icebear won't spawn until [Oct1999].
Why waste time on these patches? We are clearly past those dates in the game's timeline.
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-12-2025, 07:34 PM
If you just want confirmation that Green 2.0 is coming, go read the bug forum. You can see they are fixing things which could only matter on a future Green 2.0 server (eg. fixing content that is already out-of-era).
However, while it's true that Green 2.0 is coming, the staff operates on their own, very slow timeline; breath holding is ill-advised.
I believe one is coming. The patch notes from June tell me. When, is the question...
Ciderpress
07-12-2025, 09:42 PM
Was about to make the same point but glad to see it's been made for me. Some people have really strong opinions without doing something as simple as reading patch notes posted on the front page.
Drueric
07-13-2025, 01:30 AM
They were going to merge blue and green and wipe. But that was supposed to be a couple years ago...
Wonton
07-13-2025, 02:23 AM
Green 2.0 will come out one day, I just know it will..... And I am eagerly fucking waiting that's for sure, HYYYYYYYPE!!!
Also, I think they still patch for green because they want it to be perfect so that when 2.0 rolls around it'll be like 98% accurate as to how it was back in 1999. God Bless Brothers.
Realm
07-13-2025, 03:32 AM
Thursday for sure.
sajbert
07-13-2025, 05:03 AM
Green was always intended to be the finished product while Blue essentially served as a trial run / development server prior to Green’s release. There won’t be a new server because Green is the fulfillment of the original vision. It’s mission accomplished at this point. Simple as that.
If you want a fresh experience, start up an alt and don’t put 200k into it to trivialize the content.
Uh. No.
Green still sees patches of pre-current content. Green was initially supposed to be merged with Blue but then they went back on that statement and left it up in the air. Maybe the goal was a classic like run through the content just one time, or a recurring server, I haven't seen anything to state one or the other.
Drueric
07-13-2025, 07:04 AM
Maybe they need more donations.
Goregasmic
07-13-2025, 09:58 AM
Also, I think they still patch for green because they want it to be perfect so that when 2.0 rolls around it'll be like 98% accurate as to how it was back in 1999. God Bless Brothers.
Yeah I think something like implementing the lull nerf before green 2.0 hits would have MASSIVE consequences on how the economy would unfold. Other stuff like adjustments to spell resists and fixing mages would be nice too. Would make sense to hold up green 2.0 release until some of the last major kinks are ironed out.
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-13-2025, 11:32 AM
Thursday for sure.
Thank you. I put in a vacation day at work...
ya.dingus
07-13-2025, 02:15 PM
I wonder if the project will ever come back to life.
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-13-2025, 02:35 PM
I wonder if the project will ever come back to life.
I believe they warned everyone not to create multiple characters on the same account across both Blue and Green servers for that reason.
If you happened to miss that message, you would eventually have to decide which characters you are going to delete so you only end up with 8 total during a merger.
ya.dingus
07-13-2025, 02:50 PM
I believe they warned everyone not to create multiple characters on the same account across both Blue and Green servers for that reason.
If you happened to miss that message, you would eventually have to decide which characters you are going to delete so you only end up with 8 total during a merger.
??
Was this just a comment out of left field or what?
cd288
07-16-2025, 11:51 AM
Green was always intended to be the finished product while Blue essentially served as a trial run / development server prior to Green’s release. There won’t be a new server because Green is the fulfillment of the original vision. It’s mission accomplished at this point. Simple as that.
If you want a fresh experience, start up an alt and don’t put 200k into it to trivialize the content.
Huh? This is absolutely not true. Look at the staff's own words
cd288
07-16-2025, 11:52 AM
??
Was this just a comment out of left field or what?
No. It was in the staff's messaging at launch
WarpathEQ
07-16-2025, 04:08 PM
My prediction is that a new server comes after they solve the unclassic resists and channeling issues. That seems to be the final big piece of the mechanics that doesn't work as intended for this classic project.
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-16-2025, 07:59 PM
??
Was this just a comment out of left field or what?
No.
Appearances are this was part of your comment. And what I was replying too.
"If you want to server merge, then you have to server purge."
Goregasmic
07-16-2025, 09:41 PM
My prediction is that a new server comes after they solve the unclassic resists and channeling issues. That seems to be the final big piece of the mechanics that doesn't work as intended for this classic project.
What's the channeling issue again? Too little interrupts on p99?
Swish
07-17-2025, 01:16 AM
My prediction is that a new server comes after they solve the unclassic resists and channeling issues. That seems to be the final big piece of the mechanics that doesn't work as intended for this classic project.
PQ got told no resets/new servers as part of the agreement with Daybreak... if that's any indicator.
sajbert
07-17-2025, 01:37 PM
Difficult to say when the p99-team don't communicate with us. Could be that Green was an exception and since then no no fresh server has been greenlit by Daybreak.
If Daybreak doesn't allow fresh/rotating private servers (which I think makes sense) but allows for QoL tweaks like permanent legacy item drops on Quarm then I think there could be an argument for implementing something similar on Green. Perhaps opening up legacy camp and respawning warders on a cycling original timeline schedule.
But yeah, it's anyone's guess.
jolanar
07-17-2025, 02:28 PM
This whole thing is turning into a George R. R. Martin is never going to write the Winds of Winter kind of thing.
cd288
07-17-2025, 03:22 PM
Difficult to say when the p99-team don't communicate with us. Could be that Green was an exception and since then no no fresh server has been greenlit by Daybreak.
If Daybreak doesn't allow fresh/rotating private servers (which I think makes sense) but allows for QoL tweaks like permanent legacy item drops on Quarm then I think there could be an argument for implementing something similar on Green. Perhaps opening up legacy camp and respawning warders on a cycling original timeline schedule.
But yeah, it's anyone's guess.
The P99 agreement allows new servers as long as they don't go past Velious and, presumably, as long as they don't do crazy stuff like PQ and THJ.
zelld52
07-18-2025, 09:31 AM
Was that agreement in perpetuity, forever? I doubt it - it more than likely had a time frame on it - and it could quite possibly be the case that the agreement is reaching the end of its terms.
I have a feeling that a new p99 server would not please the current Daybreak team - as they are struggling with TLPs. Fresh p99 server would rob Daybreak of potentially thousands of subscriptions, in their minds.
Agrimir
07-19-2025, 11:42 AM
Was that agreement in perpetuity, forever? I doubt it - it more than likely had a time frame on it - and it could quite possibly be the case that the agreement is reaching the end of its terms.
I have a feeling that a new p99 server would not please the current Daybreak team - as they are struggling with TLPs. Fresh p99 server would rob Daybreak of potentially thousands of subscriptions, in their minds.
They hate it so much that they agreed to officially recognize another emulator.
Drueric
07-19-2025, 03:55 PM
We dont need a new server, we just need to wipe this one and start over fresh. Green has gotten quite stale.
Coridan
07-19-2025, 07:38 PM
The Quarm agreement is pretty trash, so I hope P99's is better.
If DBG had any brains they'd just buy P99 and actually run it as a 4 year recycle server.
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-20-2025, 10:19 AM
We dont need a new server, we just need to wipe this one and start over fresh. Green has gotten quite stale.
A thousand thumbs up!
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-20-2025, 10:22 AM
Was that agreement in perpetuity, forever? I doubt it - it more than likely had a time frame on it - and it could quite possibly be the case that the agreement is reaching the end of its terms.
I have a feeling that a new p99 server would not please the current Daybreak team - as they are struggling with TLPs. Fresh p99 server would rob Daybreak of potentially thousands of subscriptions, in their minds.
It does not make sense the P99 team is patching old content to take certain NPCs out of the game until later dates when they would then spawn. Most of those NPCs will appear in the game in the summer of 1999. The Green server is obviously way past those dates.
So why waste time on the latest patch introduced last month?
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-20-2025, 10:27 AM
I don't know squat about THJ, but I have a level 54 Necro on Project Quarm. RIP.
I figured a Legal notice would eventually be handed down by DBG, but not this soon. I was wagering it would be given to the Quarm team on the first day Luclin opened.
P99 does not have a legal agreement to go past Velious. I figured Quarm had no agreement at all to even start a server.
sajbert
07-20-2025, 12:04 PM
I don't know squat about THJ, but I have a level 54 Necro on Project Quarm. RIP.
I figured a Legal notice would eventually be handed down by DBG, but not this soon. I was wagering it would be given to the Quarm team on the first day Luclin opened.
P99 does not have a legal agreement to go past Velious. I figured Quarm had no agreement at all to even start a server.
quarm is back
sajbert
07-20-2025, 12:07 PM
It does not make sense the P99 team is patching old content to take certain NPCs out of the game until later dates when they would then spawn. Most of those NPCs will appear in the game in the summer of 1999. The Green server is obviously way past those dates.
So why waste time on the latest patch introduced last month?
p99-devs are playing on their own classic server without us
Goregasmic
07-20-2025, 12:52 PM
I have a feeling that a new p99 server would not please the current Daybreak team - as they are struggling with TLPs. Fresh p99 server would rob Daybreak of potentially thousands of subscriptions, in their minds.
Classic is too different from most TLP rulesets.
They're releasing 1 TLP a year, no wonder it is losing steam though. How many times are you cool with starting over?
We dont need a new server, we just need to wipe this one and start over fresh. Green has gotten quite stale.
If "being stale" is the criteria to wipe servers then red/blue should go before green.
Or just fusion all 3 and start a new red/green if that's even possible/allowed.
loramin
07-20-2025, 01:14 PM
Or just fusion all 3 and start a new red/green if that's even possible/allowed.
It's not just possible/allowed: the entire P99 plan has always been to "fuse" blue and green together (and then use Green 1.0's server to host Green 2.0).
However, thankfully, no one has mentioned any plans to merge the dumpster fire known as Red ;)
The green server will, at a time yet to be decided, eventually merge into blue and start over again. This merge will not happen until at least 6 months after the last patch in velious (No earlier than January 2023)
Drueric
07-20-2025, 01:20 PM
The p99 devs have abandoned us. They only keep the lights on because donations keep rolling in.
loramin
07-20-2025, 01:31 PM
The p99 devs have abandoned us. They only keep the lights on because donations keep rolling in.
People said the same thing about Velious (which took years) and Green 1.0 (which also took years). They probably said it about Kunark too, but that was before my time.
(Fun side note: you can still find old threads here where I argued with nearly everyone in the forum about Green ... because it took so long that the vast majority were convinced Green would never actually happen.)
Point being, the staff always takes a long time for their major projects ... and by "a long time", I mean a long time ... but eventually they do always complete them.
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-20-2025, 05:53 PM
quarm is back
Sure it is. That is why you don't have a server to log into. Because it's back...:rolleyes:
vales
07-20-2025, 08:21 PM
it'd be cool if there was a comment every two years confirming that it's still possible/the intention
Castle2.0
07-20-2025, 10:50 PM
Let's just get an influx of new people instead of a new server. Get ready. They will come.
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-21-2025, 06:35 AM
quarm is back
Sacre bleu
You are correct. Looks like they got a lot of work to do rolling back their code. I am surprised they are letting them go beyond Velious. I wonder if that means they will have to remove the instances. That was the best part.
I also notice THJ server was still up with around 2,100 logged in. Does that server Box or are those legit accounts? And if they are being sued, I would have thought they would have shut it down until there was a resolution.
Drueric
07-21-2025, 07:39 AM
Sacre bleu
You are correct. Looks like they got a lot of work to do rolling back their code. I am surprised they are letting them go beyond Velious. I wonder if that means they will have to remove the instances. That was the best part.
I also notice THJ server was still up with around 2,100 logged in. Does that server Box or are those legit accounts? And if they are being sued, I would have thought they would have shut it down until there was a resolution.
They allow 2 characters to be logged in at the same time, so long as one is only a bazaar trader that never leaves bazaar.
zelld52
07-21-2025, 09:32 AM
They hate it so much that they agreed to officially recognize another emulator.
Oh is Quarm rebooting?
Im talking about a fresh, legit server that would attract people wanting to roll on a fresh, legit server to give them the true feeling.
Ghost_of_Fippy
07-21-2025, 09:39 AM
Oh is Quarm rebooting?
Im talking about a fresh, legit server that would attract people wanting to roll on a fresh, legit server to give them the true feeling.
Doesn't sound like a reboot. There will be a server cap at 1200 players on at one time, and a queue like DBG does during a new server launch. And like DBG's TLP server launches, I wager the players are not going to log their characters out of the game due to the cap.
If Quarm was not ready for the Luclin expansion to open, it may be down for a while. Who really knows. You might check their Discord channel for updates.
From Google AI
No, Project Quarm was not shut down. It was allowed to continue operating, but with significant changes to its custom features and mechanics due to an agreement with Daybreak Games. Project Quarm will now focus on a more classic EverQuest experience, removing custom content and unique mechanics. The server is also undergoing a transition to the Luclin expansion and will have a player cap of 1200 players, with an offline bazaar trading feature.
cd288
07-21-2025, 10:24 AM
(Fun side note: you can still find old threads here where I argued with nearly everyone in the forum about Green ... because it took so long that the vast majority were convinced Green would never actually happen.)
Point being, the staff always takes a long time for their major projects ... and by "a long time", I mean a long time ... but eventually they do always complete them.
Yup. People always said Green would never happen. It did.
There will be Green 2.0 eventually. Who knows when eventually is though.
Findlyn
07-21-2025, 02:47 PM
However, while it's true that Green 2.0 is coming, the staff operates on their own, very slow timeline; breath holding is ill-advised.
But if you hold your breath enough, you will time travel! You will get sleepy and wake up at a later time. Do enough and you will time travel to new server. Or get brain damage from lack of oxygen. *shrug*
Findlyn
07-21-2025, 02:52 PM
Sacre bleu
You are correct. Looks like they got a lot of work to do rolling back their code. I am surprised they are letting them go beyond Velious. I wonder if that means they will have to remove the instances. That was the best part.
I also notice THJ server was still up with around 2,100 logged in. Does that server Box or are those legit accounts? And if they are being sued, I would have thought they would have shut it down until there was a resolution.
Guild/pvp instances are allowed to stay. Along side the NG+, S/SF/HC modes. Basically only losing the custom race/class combos, the khati raid and future froglok race/zones and mask from veksar.
Not only is THJ still running with the lawsuit, they are openly still taking money and said they are working on updates. They just wont push updates until after the trial(tbh i doubt thj might be around after anyway tho)
Goregasmic
07-21-2025, 07:20 PM
it'd be cool if there was a comment every two years confirming that it's still possible/the intention
Sadly, the way they're handling it right now is probably the way they're harassed the least. Imagine making a roadmap and not making the deadlines, people would go mental.
F0rmsh1fter
07-21-2025, 09:41 PM
Sadly, the way they're handling it right now is probably the way they're harassed the least. Imagine making a roadmap and not making the deadlines, people would go mental.
It also probably implies guilt to cease operations, from the perspective of a slimy (read:any) lawyer
ashentco
07-21-2025, 10:32 PM
Doesn't sound like a reboot. There will be a server cap at 1200 players on at one time, and a queue like DBG does during a new server launch. And like DBG's TLP server launches, I wager the players are not going to log their characters out of the game due to the cap.
If Quarm was not ready for the Luclin expansion to open, it may be down for a while. Who really knows. You might check their Discord channel for updates.
From Google AI
No, Project Quarm was not shut down. It was allowed to continue operating, but with significant changes to its custom features and mechanics due to an agreement with Daybreak Games. Project Quarm will now focus on a more classic EverQuest experience, removing custom content and unique mechanics. The server is also undergoing a transition to the Luclin expansion and will have a player cap of 1200 players, with an offline bazaar trading feature.
Not really sure why you'd include the bottom, as that feature hallucinates everything it pops out. Anyone who actually plays that server could have answered these questions without speculating. So here goes-
PQ was turned off immediately voluntarily by the staff when the THJ lawsuit hit. Funny enough, THJ never stopped operating and is blatantly taking money from the community, and making the case against them worse and worse as time goes on. After about 3 weeks of being offline, Secrets announced that she had talked to DBG and been given permission to operate fully legally and without interruption if she rolled back the custom content and put a 1200 player cap on the server with a queue system.
Since Luclin wasn't supposed to launch until 9 months after Velious (which opened in April) they are disabling all raid mobs in Luclin, but opening the zones PURELY BECAUSE it will allow them to keep Beastlords in the game without violating the agreement, which released early.
PQ turns back on August 1st, with AA's enabled and Luclin zones open, but no raid mobs spawning. Players who had illegal race/class combos will be forced to select a new race.
F0rmsh1fter
07-22-2025, 06:40 AM
Weird that rogean didn’t have a mandated cap
zelld52
07-22-2025, 08:43 AM
Weird that rogean didn’t have a mandated cap
TLPs were alot healthier in 2019
Snaggles
07-22-2025, 12:09 PM
Weird that rogean didn’t have a mandated cap
I expect he used the time tested method of negotiating with Daybreak before getting a subpoena.
zelld52
07-22-2025, 12:14 PM
I expect he used the time tested method of negotiating with Daybreak before getting a subpoena.
This one trick lawyers hate
cd288
07-22-2025, 02:24 PM
It also probably implies guilt to cease operations, from the perspective of a slimy (read:any) lawyer
As a lawyer, I wouldn't say it implies guilt to cease operations. What I would tell them is you don't have to cease operations unless Daybreak files and injunction and a court rules on it. Granted, it might be in your interest to cease operations regardless; a court might look kindly on that and if Daybreak is suing for speculative and/or punitive damages you may be only making those damages worse by continuing to operate...but there's nothing legally that says you have to stop unless there's an injunction.
Infectious
07-22-2025, 05:21 PM
Weird that rogean didn’t have a mandated cap
You comparing rogean to secrets lol? Secrets? Haha
Wonton
07-25-2025, 01:16 AM
You comparing rogean to secrets lol? Secrets? Haha
Omg Secrets.. Hahahah
Elijah850
07-25-2025, 12:21 PM
BUMP for P99 Gold in October!
zelld52
07-25-2025, 01:01 PM
BUMP for P99 Gold in October!
maybe October 2029. New server every 10 years from now until the end of the world (so 2039 last P99 launch)
Zoolander
08-11-2025, 08:16 PM
i bet all my manastones that rogean and nilbog would have opened a new server once every 3 years or just wipe the current ones if they "could".
i strongly believe its an issue with daybreak.
shovelquest
08-11-2025, 08:35 PM
Yeah, after THJ got the you can keep going but no new expansions agreement, I wondered if that is the exact same agreement they have here.
Reiwa
08-11-2025, 11:10 PM
Secrets is clearly guilty and knows it.
cd288
08-12-2025, 10:00 AM
Yeah, after THJ got the you can keep going but no new expansions agreement, I wondered if that is the exact same agreement they have here.
The agreement with P99 is now public from the lawsuit. You can read the whole thing.
Botten
08-12-2025, 11:26 AM
I foresee Blue and Green will not be merged.
Lets face it.
- Dealing with duplicate names
- Injecting soooooooooo much plat and items into Green economy is going to cause complaints
- Why would the GM staff want to deal with the headaches in competing raid arguments?
- Needing to balance the work on this merger while opening yet another server just is too much work.
Nah, just better to open yet another server and let blue quietly fade to nothing (see Red) and allow those who don't like competition to remain.
Bonus foresight! No injection of Luclin to either green or blue. Too much work and already soooooo much has been stripped to put this stuff back in.
Oh and Secrets's server will be the place to be for fun!
Oh and Secrets's server will be the place to be for fun!
>TAKP Client
https://i.imgur.com/KHEuGE6.gif
shovelquest
08-12-2025, 12:46 PM
The agreement with P99 is now public from the lawsuit. You can read the whole thing.
cool where is it.
cd288
08-12-2025, 12:54 PM
cool where is it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/project1999/comments/1mk59d2/full_text_of_p99s_agreement_with_daybreak_games/
cd288
08-12-2025, 12:54 PM
I foresee Blue and Green will not be merged.
Lets face it.
- Dealing with duplicate names
- Injecting soooooooooo much plat and items into Green economy is going to cause complaints
- Why would the GM staff want to deal with the headaches in competing raid arguments?
- Needing to balance the work on this merger while opening yet another server just is too much work.
Nah, just better to open yet another server and let blue quietly fade to nothing (see Red) and allow those who don't like competition to remain.
Bonus foresight! No injection of Luclin to either green or blue. Too much work and already soooooo much has been stripped to put this stuff back in.
Oh and Secrets's server will be the place to be for fun!
Every now and then Botten comes here and posts random arguments against a merge, that are then shot down and he disappears. Then comes back a bit later and tries again.
Best to just put him on ignore
shovelquest
08-12-2025, 01:10 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/project1999/comments/1mk59d2/full_text_of_p99s_agreement_with_daybreak_games/
damn i wish thj could do GoD!! :mad:
I wonder if this has caused any future server launches:
8) Release of the Velious Expansion. You agree not to release the Project 1999 ''Velious"
expansion until August 1, 2015, to avoid a potential conflict with the release of Daybreak's
progression server at the end of May. You also agree to delay future Project 1999 release dates
as reasonably requested by Daybreak to avoid similar conflicts.
lmao they be playin p99
10) No IP Block. You agree to permanently remove the IP block and any other technological
measures that would prevent Daybreak employees accessing Pr.oject 1999. Daybreak
employees must be free to create accounts and to access Project 1999 at all times.
Oh damn
B) Transfer to Daybreak. It is important to Daybreak that you remain in control of Project
1999 at all times. You agree not to sell, lease, or transfer control of Project 1999 to any other
person or company. If and when you decide to discontinue your operation of Project 1999, you
agree to provide prior notice to us and. upon request from Daybreak, to either (i) transfer the
emulator, the website, and all related social media sites free of charge to Daybreak, or (ii)
permanently delete the emulator, the website, and all related social media sites. Upon sul:h
transfer to Daybreak or permanent deletion, Daybreak agrees to release all legal claims it may
have against you.
Zoolander
08-12-2025, 01:25 PM
“you also agree to delay future project 1999 release dates as reasonably requested by daybreak to avoid similar conflicts.”
Botten
08-12-2025, 01:51 PM
Every now and then Botten comes here and posts random arguments against a merge, that are then shot down and he disappears. Then comes back a bit later and tries again.
Best to just put him on ignore
What ... it has been 14 years now playing on P99.
Oh the stories, expectation and attitudes from so long ago.
Hats off to you for your hopes and wishes :)
shovelquest
08-12-2025, 02:05 PM
“you also agree to delay future project 1999 release dates as reasonably requested by daybreak to avoid similar conflicts.”
HOLY SHIT it does say that! I was right CD28! I was right!
No green lol it's up to daybreak games! LOL
8) Release of the Velious Expansion. You agree not to release the Project 1999 ''Velious"
expansion until August 1, 2015, to avoid a potential conflict with the release of Daybreak's
progression server at the end of May. You also agree to delay future Project 1999 release dates
as reasonably requested by Daybreak to avoid similar conflicts.
cd288
08-12-2025, 02:24 PM
My understanding of the history there is that when Velious was about to launch Daybreak was launching a TLP. So P99 pushed the release of Velious back so that it wouldn't compete with the launch of the TLP.
I don't think that's saying they can't launch another server without permission. It's saying that if Daybreak makes a reasonable request for them to delay the launch (such as if it's overlapping with a TLP launch, like the release of Velious on Blue was) then P99 will agree to delay temporarily.
shovelquest
08-12-2025, 02:38 PM
You also agree to delay future Project 1999 release dates as reasonably requested by Daybreak to avoid similar conflicts.
It reads to me in the text text that daybreak has to basically approve of any future release or p99 runs the risk of nullifying the contract.
But then inquiring to daybreak puts you back in the cross hairs, so even that can make it risky IMO
ChatGPT:
How to Follow This Properly & Legally:
1. Maintain Open Communication with Daybreak
Proactively inform Daybreak of your upcoming release plans.
Ask if they anticipate any scheduling conflicts.
Keep a formal or documented communication channel (e.g. email) for tracking requests and responses.
2. Assess Requests for Reasonableness
"Reasonably requested" gives you some discretion.
A request would be reasonable if:
It is made in good faith,
It is related to a legitimate concern (like a Daybreak release),
It is not excessively burdensome (e.g., asking for a delay of months without cause could be unreasonable).
Unreasonable requests (e.g. “don’t release for a year for no reason”) may not have to be honored, but you should document your reasoning and possibly seek legal advice before rejecting.
3. Document All Delays and Requests
Keep a written record of:
The date of Daybreak’s request,
The content of the request,
Your internal response and actions taken,
Any relevant correspondence.
4. Avoid Independent Releases That Conflict with Daybreak
If you plan a release, and Daybreak informs you that their schedule includes a competing product at the same time, you must delay.
Work with them on selecting an alternative date that avoids conflict.
5. Have a Process for Adjusting Future Dates
Make your release dates provisional or “subject to change based on coordination with Daybreak” to maintain flexibility.
It certainly doesn’t stop them but it does make it more risky.
bcbrown
08-12-2025, 03:51 PM
Do you really outsource all your critical thinking to a computer?
bcbrown
08-12-2025, 03:54 PM
Shut up retard.
I guess so.
Do you really outsource all your critical thinking to a computer?
for most people this would be a vast improvement in crit thinking skills, i don't see the issue.
shovelquest
08-12-2025, 04:02 PM
I am bcbrowns daddy and he's just mad about it, np.
Elijah850
08-12-2025, 06:30 PM
Daybreak does not spend a lot of money maintaining EQ. Even though Time locked Progression servers are probably losing numbers over time, they still bring in multiple thousands of new players/accounts/monthly subs every year from players that are hooked on them like the community here is hooked on p99. The difference in the two communities is that their TLP Cash shop with exp potions, race changes, 40 slot bags, etc. is BOOMING every year at TLP time and otherwise depending on the month and what new rainbow familiar they reskin. I don't doubt that they would love to delete all of the private servers, if not acquire and instantly monetize them. The cashflow for EG7/Daybreak from the Everquest IP is still very viable and lucrative in 2025. I wish they would just respect the fanbase and give P99 the permission to support themselves more through the obviously very willing community here so that maybe the future of this Project could not be such a mute subject.
Elijah850
08-12-2025, 06:53 PM
I guess so.
LOL
shovelquest
08-12-2025, 07:48 PM
LOL
don't rnf in green chat.
Reiwa
08-12-2025, 11:19 PM
Daybreak does not spend a lot of money maintaining EQ. Even though Time locked Progression servers are probably losing numbers over time, they still bring in multiple thousands of new players/accounts/monthly subs every year from players that are hooked on them like the community here is hooked on p99. The difference in the two communities is that their TLP Cash shop with exp potions, race changes, 40 slot bags, etc. is BOOMING every year at TLP time and otherwise depending on the month and what new rainbow familiar they reskin. I don't doubt that they would love to delete all of the private servers, if not acquire and instantly monetize them. The cashflow for EG7/Daybreak from the Everquest IP is still very viable and lucrative in 2025. I wish they would just respect the fanbase and give P99 the permission to support themselves more through the obviously very willing community here so that maybe the future of this Project could not be such a mute subject.
Unlikely. Every corporation is an investment firm these days and I don't expect Darkpaw Studios or whatever they're called now has more than 5 developers and 2 admins.
The parent company will probably dump debt on them at some point and they'll have to file for Chapter 7. You'll still get to play it's a pretend funny money bankruptcy like with Mr Trump in his ventures.
cd288
08-13-2025, 10:31 AM
You also agree to delay future Project 1999 release dates as reasonably requested by Daybreak to avoid similar conflicts.
It reads to me in the text text that daybreak has to basically approve of any future release or p99 runs the risk of nullifying the contract.
But then inquiring to daybreak puts you back in the cross hairs, so even that can make it risky IMO
ChatGPT:
It certainly doesn’t stop them but it does make it more risky.
Yeah that's not what that language says. It doesn't require Daybreak's consent to launch a new server. If it did, it would explicitly say that they won't launch one without
Daybreak's express prior written consent.
Now, if Daybreak finds out they are launching Green 2.0 and wants to ask them to delay it for a long time...they can of course do so, but under that language they'd have to provide a reason other than "because we said so" and if that reason wasn't reasonable then P99 could ask a court to allow them to launch the server. Would P99 do that? I'm guessing probably not since it would be time consuming and expensive to litigate whether Daybreak's justification was "reasonable". So if they didn't then yeah that language kind of could be used to prevent them from launching a server. But if P99 went to court it would probably have a good shot at winning.
zelld52
08-13-2025, 10:36 AM
p99 aint going to court - have you seen Takahashi v. Daybreak?!
xD
cd288
08-13-2025, 12:19 PM
If you're just arguing over "reasonableness" then it's not impossible they would do it. That's likely one hearing and no real discovery now that I think about it
shovelquest
08-13-2025, 01:18 PM
I am more keen to listen to chatgpt and disagree with your assessment CD but you can argue about it with chatGPT not me.
I really doubt DBG has any intention of actually going to court over any of this.
cd288
08-18-2025, 02:25 PM
I do think Chat GPT (or an equivalent) will be a good legal resource eventually. Currently my advice is to take anything it says on legal stuff with a grain of salt. Not just about this obviously, but if you ever need it in other areas of your life for a legal answer.
It's just a powerful data aggregator and isn't able to do true nuanced analysis. I've asked it regulatory questions before and found it's answers to either be fully incorrect or incomplete because it's mass searching based on key words and phrases, but not able to actually interpret or understand context.
Coridan
08-27-2025, 10:24 AM
I think they're just still working on the timeline stuff and want it to be even more perfect but that the goal line always moves further away as they get closer.
Allishia
08-27-2025, 12:24 PM
Merge is incoming any day now /nod
Swish
08-27-2025, 04:27 PM
Are you guys looking forward to red 2.0? That's no less likely than this merge thread.
loramin
08-27-2025, 04:29 PM
Are you guys looking forward to red 2.0? That's no less likely than this merge thread.
I'd say the fact that Blue/Green have players, and Red doesn't, makes Red 2.0 a lot less likely.
Ghost_of_Fippy
08-28-2025, 04:12 PM
Are you guys looking forward to red 2.0? That's no less likely than this merge thread.
What does that stand for, a new launch of red with only 2 players on it?
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.