Why are evil monks superior to good monks?

[Gugg]

At the very least good monks and evil monks should be on the same level but technically speaking there is no such thing as an evil monk just like there is no such thing as an evil healer.

Not only do evil monks in P99 exist but they're superior to the human monks.

The lizards have been given cheat mode with their innate regen which breaks the game.

Doesn't Luclin fix these bugs?

[fortior]

read the lore you dumb bitch.

[drackgon]

Lizard monks are not really superior, compared to human monks. So stop whinning. Human monks can still FD/still use fungi/ Still click bracer and use throwing stars, And actually does a little bit more dmg. So stop saying evil(lizard is better then good(human). More so since by lore, Humans can be evil, and lizards can be good.Unless ur talking about Shadow knights vs Pallys.. bc I've proven SK over Pally /Flex on Arkis

[Jibartik]

good monks have better gear.

An eyepatch and golden pants.

[doeda]

Shroud of Longevity > not having Shroud of Longevity

[Baler]

Monks are both good and bad.

There is no try, Do or do not.

That door swings both ways.

Ying & Yang
(Iksar monks are superior to human monks, I know something about p99 that makes iksars even better than other iksars... I've said too much)

[Jeffari]

Dark elf monks are the best

[imsorryGMs]

What do you mean bugs? The innate regen and ac boost working exactly as intended

[Ravager]

Is the Dark Side stronger? No. No. No. Quicker. Easier. More seductive.

[starkind]

Is the Dark Side stronger? No. No. No. Quicker. Easier. More seductive.

yap

[fortior]

technically there is no such thing as an evil person, I say, playing a video game where you can follow the gods of fear and hate

[Doujou]

Good and Evil are relative

Outside of that though, looking at human history to the present...yep, Humans are evil.

[Graahle]

If you unironically roll an Iksar Monk you are a pathetic loser.

It's Human Eyepatch or get the fuck out.

[Arteker]

By modern gamer standards it make no sense.

for people who care about lore and say fuck class race balance it`s justified.

afterall if wasnt because a human monk tried to solo cazic and he got owned u would not have iksar monks...

Origin of Iksar Monks
The Iksar Monks actually owe their existence to a very famous Human monk, one of the first of his kind who in his hubris attacked Cazic Thule on his home Plane of Fear. The story is related as part of the quest for the Whistling Fists via an in-game book given by Cazic Thule himself

Zan Fi believed in his power and made way to do battle with Cazic Thule in his own plane. Dispatching his minions one by one he came to the Lord of Fear. He saw and threw challenge to him. The battle lasted for days, Cazic Thule was weakened but Zan Fi would be defeated in the end. Cazic Thule seeing this amazing skill in battle decided that it should be instilled into the broodlings of his great race. He took the essence of Zan Fi and placed it into an Iksar, Tynn. Cazic Thule bestowed unto Tynn the gift of the Whistling Fists. He did this as a mockery of Zan Fi and his failure in battle. He was placed within the empire of Iksar with only one thing in mind, to train other Iksar the way of the monk to inflict a new breed of fear and pain unto their foes

[Nirgon]

Humans get easy mode starting area and faction.

It's balanced from an rpg perspective. Get over it snow flakes.

[cornisthebest]

imagine deciding what you play based on stats rather than what looks cooler.