View Full Version : President Obama is calling me a dyke?
Apostle
05-12-2014, 08:13 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6-1sOYPm2M
This is a video of the 1st page of Google search results for the search term "Barack Obama," from a search that I did a few minutes ago.
It seems to me that President Obama has added calling me a dyke to his agenda of personal abuses and human rights abuses.
Skittlez
05-12-2014, 08:16 PM
WASTE OF MY FUCKING LIFE. OMG.
Rettj
05-12-2014, 08:53 PM
didnt click carpet muncher
Estolcles
05-12-2014, 10:27 PM
That was a useless video.
On the flipside, Obama is the most worthless human being in the world (after Nancy Grace and all of the Kardashians) and deserves a very drawn out and painful death... but only after he's out of office.
stonez138
05-12-2014, 10:58 PM
That was a useless video.
On the flipside, Obama is the most worthless human being in the world (after Nancy Grace and all of the Kardashians) and deserves a very drawn out and painful death... but only after he's out of office.
Go watch some more professional wrestling or duck dynasty. Your opinion is obviously shit.
FoxxHound
05-12-2014, 11:20 PM
http://d13z1xw8270sfc.cloudfront.net/origin/176446/sticky_poo.png
radditsu
05-13-2014, 08:16 AM
That was a useless video.
On the flipside, Obama is the most worthless human being in the world (after Nancy Grace and all of the Kardashians) and deserves a very drawn out and painful death... but only after he's out of office.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers
Sidelle
05-13-2014, 09:46 AM
That was a useless video.
On the flipside, Obama is the most worthless human being in the world (after Nancy Grace and all of the Kardashians) and deserves a very drawn out and painful death... but only after he's out of office.
Rumor has it a bunch of people, including civilian militia, going to DC this friday to tell Obama and others to GTFO.
http://operationamericanspring.org/
No idea if this is really happening or not but maybe shit's about to get real?
... or maybe no one shows up at all. Who knows.
myriverse
05-13-2014, 09:59 AM
Every day of every freaking week there's a group of people heading to DC to protest something. YaaaaAAAwn.
moklianne
05-13-2014, 11:27 AM
Every day of every freaking week there's a group of people heading to DC to protest something. YaaaaAAAwn.
Exactly, it was the same during GW's reign. Nothing to see here.
radditsu
05-13-2014, 12:59 PM
Exactly, it was the same during GW's reign. Nothing to see here.
radditsu
05-13-2014, 01:03 PM
For real do you guys not remember George W Bush?
Crap on a cracker guys. I remember George W Bush. It wasn't that long ago.
2 wars, my friends dead, Barry had to kill bin laden? Only good thing he ever did, unintentonally, is create a power vaccum where Kurds can get basically sovereignty in Northern Iraq? Oh and he gave people an IRS check that one time.
I mean Barry isn't a great president but for fucks sake guys perspective.
stonez138
05-13-2014, 01:17 PM
For real do you guys not remember George W Bush?
Crap on a cracker guys. I remember George W Bush. It wasn't that long ago.
2 wars, my friends dead, Barry had to kill bin laden? Only good thing he ever did, unintentonally, is create a power vaccum where Kurds can get basically sovereignty in Northern Iraq? Oh and he gave people an IRS check that one time.
I mean Barry isn't a great president but for fucks sake guys perspective.
But....But....socialism! FOX NEWS said so! OMG He's destroying America!
But seriously lets not forget government sanctioned torture, hurricane Katrina ("Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job.") and the patriot act.
Glenzig
05-13-2014, 02:38 PM
Haven't all presidents been not good?
Ahldagor
05-13-2014, 02:49 PM
Haven't all presidents been not good?
lincoln, jefferson, madison, both roosevelts, wilson, kennedy, and andrew jackson were pretty dang good for their times.
stonez138
05-13-2014, 02:53 PM
I mean Kennedy did avert a nuclear war, in spite of the council he recieved after our plane was shot down.
Sidelle
05-13-2014, 03:02 PM
For real do you guys not remember George W Bush?
Crap on a cracker guys. I remember George W Bush. It wasn't that long ago.
2 wars, my friends dead, Barry had to kill bin laden? Only good thing he ever did, unintentonally, is create a power vaccum where Kurds can get basically sovereignty in Northern Iraq? Oh and he gave people an IRS check that one time.
I mean Barry isn't a great president but for fucks sake guys perspective.
I've never liked Bush. But I'm more concerned about the present and future at this point. Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act, allowing presidents for the first time ever the power to have the military pick up anyone anywhere in the world and hold them indefinitely without charges. Yes, that also applies to us regular citizens here at home. Doesn't that bother you?
Nihilist_santa
05-13-2014, 03:11 PM
NDAA was also around under Bush they just called it the patriot act which still exist. These guys work for the same big money players. Its a great game they have going. Everyone sits around trashing an interchangeable figurehead meanwhile nothing ever gets repealed . They just continue on the work that was in place before them. Now that those pesky campaign donation limits are gone and propaganda on us soil is legal this thing should really kick into high gear.
stonez138
05-13-2014, 03:16 PM
I've never liked Bush. But I'm more concerned about the present and future at this point. Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act, allowing presidents for the first time ever the power to have the military pick up anyone anywhere in the world and hold them indefinitely without charges. Yes, that also applies to us regular citizens here at home. Doesn't that bother you?
It does. I'm also concerned with him killing U.S. citizens without a trial. It sets a frightening precedent and who is to say that future presidents won't do the same thing here at home instead of just abroad.
As long as the right keeps:
-Denying climate change
-Denying evolution
-Blocking environmental regulation
-Subsidizing agri-business
-Smothering mass transit, infrastructure, and urban planning projects
-Adhering to a trickle-down philosophy
... I'd still prefer the world's worst democrat candidates, just as a matter of principle.
Liberal states are passing their own healthcare and wage reforms while the illegitimate, gerrymandered house obstructs any form of federal progress (During the last congressional elections, Democratic candidates received 1.17 million more votes than Republican ones).
Will be interesting to watch conservative hick areas fall even further behind. The HDI in the rural south is already akin to a developing nation.
stonez138
05-13-2014, 03:23 PM
NDAA was also around under Bush they just called it the patriot act which still exist. These guys work for the same big money players. Its a great game they have going. Everyone sits around trashing an interchangeable figurehead meanwhile nothing ever gets repealed . They just continue on the work that was in place before them. Now that those pesky campaign donation limits are gone and propaganda on us soil is legal this thing should really kick into high gear.
Yeah it's as if we have republicans that say they're for abortion and republicans that say they're against abortion.
Ahldagor
05-13-2014, 03:23 PM
NDAA was also around under Bush they just called it the patriot act which still exist. These guys work for the same big money players. Its a great game they have going. Everyone sits around trashing an interchangeable figurehead meanwhile nothing ever gets repealed . They just continue on the work that was in place before them. Now that those pesky campaign donation limits are gone and propaganda on us soil is legal this thing should really kick into high gear.
not to mention the rape of public education over the past thirty years. oddly follows along the same time line as when wage increases stopped matching the rate of inflation which has decreased the purchasing power of the average worker.
Ahldagor
05-13-2014, 03:27 PM
As long as the right keeps:
-Denying climate change
-Denying evolution
-Blocking environmental regulation
-Subsidizing agri-business
-Smothering mass transit, infrastructure, and urban planning projects
-Adhering to a trickle-down philosophy
... I'd still prefer the world's worst democrat candidates, just as a matter of principle.
Liberal states are passing their own healthcare and wage reforms while the illegitimate, gerrymandered house obstructs any form of federal progress (During the last congressional elections, Democratic candidates received 1.17 million more votes than Republican ones).
Will be interesting to watch conservative hick areas fall even further behind. The HDI in the rural south is already akin to a developing nation.
lotta yankees and cali kids moving to houston atm because of cheaper housing. i welcome it for the voting purposes.
Texas is gonna be a blue state in a few decades because of the hispanics / california refugees
Nihilist_santa
05-13-2014, 03:31 PM
Definetly Ahldagor. John Taylor Gatto has done some great work on that subject.
And to stonez138 all of them say whatever it takes to get elected its all a fairy tale crafted for the people gullible enough to buy it. Like Obama's talk about lobbyist and transparency then he appoints the heads of major banks, corporations etc to the offices that over see their industry. Like the crap with net neutrality now being spearheaded by cable industry lobbyist like Wheeler (FCC).
Ahldagor
05-13-2014, 03:34 PM
Texas is gonna be a blue state in a few decades because of the hispanics / california refugees
sooner than people think. lots of kids here like to vote and stay up on the issues with practicality based on scientific results.
Tasslehofp99
05-13-2014, 03:34 PM
Right Vs Left is old world politics, guys.
They're on the same side now, republicans/democrats....and guess what? You're not on it.
Nihilist_santa
05-13-2014, 03:35 PM
Right Vs Left is old world politics, guys.
They're on the same side now, republicans/democrats....and guess what? You're not on it.
Truth!
Sidelle
05-13-2014, 03:35 PM
Right Vs Left is old world politics, guys.
They're on the same side now, republicans/democrats....and guess what? You're not on it.
QFT
Tasslehofp99
05-13-2014, 03:38 PM
As long as the right keeps:
-Denying climate change
-Denying evolution
-Blocking environmental regulation
-Subsidizing agri-business
-Smothering mass transit, infrastructure, and urban planning projects
-Adhering to a trickle-down philosophy
... I'd still prefer the world's worst democrat candidates, just as a matter of principle.
Liberal states are passing their own healthcare and wage reforms while the illegitimate, gerrymandered house obstructs any form of federal progress (During the last congressional elections, Democratic candidates received 1.17 million more votes than Republican ones).
Will be interesting to watch conservative hick areas fall even further behind. The HDI in the rural south is already akin to a developing nation.
There is literally no difference between republicans and democrats; they're both failing this country miserably. Time to throw both of those old and mutually corrupt parties aside and start voting for a new generation. Pls stop being a lemming; anyone who votes for a republican or a democrat, in any form/level of government, is exactly that. There will be no progress in this country until both of those old world political organizations are destroyed.
moklianne
05-13-2014, 03:39 PM
Right Vs Left is old world politics, guys.
They're on the same side now, republicans/democrats....and guess what? You're not on it.
Yup, the country has been on rails to a specific destination for many decades at this point. Dems and Reps are just fucking you in different ways. Government control vs corporate control. Pick your poison.
Ahldagor
05-13-2014, 03:40 PM
Right Vs Left is old world politics, guys.
They're on the same side now, republicans/democrats....and guess what? You're not on it.
ones trying limited socialism and the other is trying pure fascist, so which controlling big gov would you feel comfortable with.
Ahldagor
05-13-2014, 03:41 PM
There is literally no difference between republicans and democrats; they're both failing this country miserably. Time to throw both of those old and mutually corrupt parties aside and start voting for a new generation. Pls stop being a lemming; anyone who votes for a republican or a democrat, in any form/level of government, is exactly that. There will be no progress in this country until both of those old world political organizations are destroyed.
you don't get to dance without a dance card.
Tasslehofp99
05-13-2014, 03:44 PM
ones trying limited socialism and the other is trying pure fascist, so which controlling big gov would you feel comfortable with.
Neither.
Both parties need to be dismantled and done away with permanently for any sort of progress to be made in this country. Voting for the lesser of two evils is exactly why this country is on a downward spiral over the last three decades, fuck that.
Abstaining, imo, is better than choosing the lesser of two evils. Atleast then you can say you had no part in the tyranny.
Nihilist_santa
05-13-2014, 03:51 PM
Neither.
Both parties need to be dismantled and done away with permanently for any sort of progress to be made in this country. Voting for the lesser of two evils is exactly why this country is on a downward spiral over the last three decades, fuck that.
Abstaining, imo, is better than choosing the lesser of two evils. Atleast then you can say you had no part in the tyranny.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke
You have to do something or you are just as responsible. The only way abstaining would help is if everyone else were on board. It is a voluntary system that people have been conditioned to rely on.
Dismantling the parties is a start but the parties exist because of an obvious polarization in political thought. All that will be left is a power vaccuum and rinse and repeat. The elite know this which is why they coopt movements like the tea party and occupy (/eye roll) so they can manage opposition.
NegaStoat
05-13-2014, 03:57 PM
I live within 100 miles of the West Coast. I have zero (0) 4th amendment rights to search and seizure from any law enforcement or government intelligence / security agencies - this was specifically approved and reaffirmed by Obama last year.
http://freepatriot.org/2013/12/07/watch-dhs-warrantless-search-seizures-4th-amendment-within-100-miles-us-coast-border/
Fuck him. And Fuck Hillary Clinton and her bullshit breaches of campaign donation law that she tool three (3) wrist slaps on for each count, on top of her numerous counts of power abuse while Bill was in office.
I'm a republican but I'm sick and tired of both sides. If I could wave a magic wand and make a single wish to effect change to my nation's government, it would be "Goddamit, stop LYING to me on EVERY matter you speak on!"
I'm just so tired of the lies. I'm just done, you know?
Tasslehofp99
05-13-2014, 04:01 PM
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke
You have to do something or you are just as responsible. The only way abstaining would help is if everyone else were on board. It is a voluntary system that people have been conditioned to rely on.
Dismantling the parties is a start but the parties exist because of an obvious polarization in political thought. All that will be left is a power vaccuum and rinse and repeat. The elite know this which is why they coopt movements like the tea party and occupy (/eye roll) so they can manage opposition.
bolded/underlined text for emphasis of these 200 year old ideas that need to be eradicated from the minds of American people.
If we all came together under the reality that times change, and with that people and minds have to change, then maybe something positive could come from it. Until people are ready to let go of these old school ways of looking at government/politics nothing will change for the better.
I mean of the people eligible for voting in the US, less than half took part in any of the last 4 presidential elections. Take that half and split it down the middle (more or less) and you've got the results of nearly all 4 of the past elections. Each major party candidate has roughly gotten 25%~ of the total number of voters who are eligible. That leaves about half of the nation's eligible voters not taking place in the elections at all.
To me, this suggests that half of the country's voters are either A. not represented by either candidate or their party, or B. they just don't care/know enough about either candidate to feel compelled to vote. In any case, whoever wins an election can't say that they did so with the approval of over 25% of eligible American voters. That is a serious issue which needs correcting immediately before any American president can be taken seriously.
I'm no political expert but it doesn't really take a genius to see that this system is failing for numerous reasons, and its happening quicker with every passing year.
Raavak
05-13-2014, 04:04 PM
And Fuck Hillary Clinton and her...
If the truth got out about Benghazi she'd burn, but it won't.
What does it matter!?
Nihilist_santa
05-13-2014, 04:18 PM
She wont burn. Her and her husband have dirt on everyone from his 8 year term. If they can get away with the deaths of people like Vince Foster or the other bodies from CIA drug trafficking in Arkansas I doubt she will go down over this.
Tasslehofp99
05-13-2014, 04:29 PM
If the truth got out about Benghazi she'd burn, but it won't.
What does it matter!?
I think that if the truth got out about ALOT of things, Washington would burn.
lol
Hastley
05-13-2014, 04:30 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6-1sOYPm2M
This is a video of the 1st page of Google search results for the search term "Barack Obama," from a search that I did a few minutes ago.
It seems to me that President Obama has added calling me a dyke to his agenda of personal abuses and human rights abuses.
if he isnt, i will.
Right Vs Left is old world politics, guys.
They're on the same side now, republicans/democrats....and guess what? You're not on it.
^There's always some guy waiting to say this like it's the most profound thing ever.
The two party system is the reality of our current political climate. I want it gone as much as the next forum snowflake who is just too informed for mainstream politics, but it still warrants discussion.
Don't use radical centrism as an excuse to be uninformed or apathetic about politics. The right and left are constantly evolving, and every wannabe George Carlin windowlicker out there saying 'It's all bullshit, man', has done exactly nothing to fuel political change.
As soon as a liberal eco-fascist shows up on the ballot, I'll finally feel properly represented. Until then, democrats and socialists are the next closest thing.
Nihilist_santa
05-13-2014, 05:33 PM
You had me until liberal eco-fascist. You are represented by the way through the current administration. Just look at the writings of people like Paul Ehrlich (science czar). He promotes the idea of forcibly sterilizing people or secretly for the good of mother earff. Sorry but every time an eco-fascist pops up to complain about the environment I have to wonder why they don't start with themselves? I mean you are consuming resources every precious second you are here. Go ahead do your part for population control and bow out.
You had me until liberal eco-fascist. You are represented by the way through the current administration. Just look at the writings of people like Paul Ehrlich (science czar). He promotes the idea of forcibly sterilizing people or secretly for the good of mother earff. Sorry but every time an eco-fascist pops up to complain about the environment I have to wonder why they don't start with themselves? I mean you are consuming resources every precious second you are here. Go ahead do your part for population control and bow out.
Nobody needs to die, people just need to have less kids for a while.
Think about it: Earth's population is 10 million.
Everyone can pollute / consume to their heart's content, no need to fight over scarce resources. Systems of governance and economics are that much easier to manage. Would solve almost every one of the world's worst problems.
All it would take is about 10 generations of having more than one child being an extreme cultural stigma, worldwide.
Seems far-fetched? Treating women like human beings was probably the same way, 100 years ago. Now even the muslims are beginning to come around
stonez138
05-13-2014, 05:54 PM
Think about it: Earth's population is 10 million.
Everyone can pollute / consume to their heart's content, no need to fight over scarce resources. Systems of governance and economics are that much easier to manage. Would solve almost every one of the world's worst problems.
All it would take is about 10 generations of having more than one child being an extreme cultural stigma, worldwide.
Seems far-fetched? Treating women like human beings was probably the same way, 100 years ago. Now even the muslims are beginning to come around
I want some of what your smoking.
Ahldagor
05-13-2014, 05:54 PM
cia had prisoners in the benghazi embassy. the militants that attacked went to get their boys and were gonna kill us citizens to do so. the political fall out is the war-hawks not getting their way, and bitching up a storm because they think it makes america look weak from their cold-war era weltanschauung.
stonez138
05-13-2014, 05:54 PM
*you're
Ahldagor
05-13-2014, 05:55 PM
Think about it: Earth's population is 10 million.
Everyone can pollute / consume to their heart's content, no need to fight over scarce resources. Systems of governance and economics are that much easier to manage. Would solve almost every one of the world's worst problems.
All it would take is about 10 generations of having more than one child being an extreme cultural stigma, worldwide.
Seems far-fetched? Treating women like human beings was probably the same way, 100 years ago. Now even the muslims are beginning to come around
educating everyone would be a peaceful means, but we don't have that long to wait. it'll come down to ww3 and control of africa will be crucial.
Glenzig
05-13-2014, 06:01 PM
lincoln, jefferson, madison, both roosevelts, wilson, kennedy, and andrew jackson were pretty dang good for their times.
No they weren't. We're just far enough removed from their presidencies that we are no longer privy to all of the info. Its easy to glorify people when you can employ revisionists history.
Ahldagor
05-13-2014, 06:05 PM
No they weren't. We're just far enough removed from their presidencies that we are no longer privy to all of the info. Its easy to glorify people when you can employ revisionists history.
hence "for their times". not to mention revisionist history adheres to current conservative politics in order to create different views of heroism. politics is a dirty game, but don't go bashing with that "we can't really know history" bullshit-amateur-nihilist argument.
stonez138
05-13-2014, 06:27 PM
No they weren't. We're just far enough removed from their presidencies that we are no longer privy to all of the info. Its easy to glorify people when you can employ revisionists history.
Almost as easy as it is to dismiss their acomplishments with out one iota of fact or reasoning.
Estolcles
05-13-2014, 06:43 PM
The current political system is why I voted for Bill Murray for president during the last presidential election.
Champion_Standing
05-13-2014, 06:52 PM
The current political system is why I voted for Bill Murray for president during the last presidential election.
confirmed agent of political change
Glenzig
05-13-2014, 06:54 PM
Almost as easy as it is to dismiss their acomplishments with out one iota of fact or reasoning.
You're right. Who were these guys?? Aren't some of them on coins and dollars or something??? Man I should have done some research on what they actually stood for and did during their presidencies. What was I thinking? Can you teach me to read?
radditsu
05-13-2014, 06:59 PM
Development of monetary policy, saving the union. Developing the parks service, Pulling back from the brink of Neuclear winter, saving europe from hitler. Saving us from depression. Freeing slaves. Purchasing and debeloping the largest land purchase in american history. Declaring independence and busting overreaching corporate interests when needed are some fycking amazing presidential traits in that list. I am not worried that this union will stand for years to come
Glenzig
05-13-2014, 07:00 PM
hence "for their times". not to mention revisionist history adheres to current conservative politics in order to create different views of heroism. politics is a dirty game, but don't go bashing with that "we can't really know history" bullshit-amateur-nihilist argument.
Well the same argument could be made that they were truly evil "for their times" also. All I'm saying is that what you're taught in a history class about how great a lot of these guys were is just a cherry picking of historical facts at best. At worst its completely dishonest about what actually happened or omits any info that would shine a bad light on them. So no its not that "we can't really know history", its that you can't really trust history books. History is written by the victors after all.
radditsu
05-13-2014, 07:05 PM
Oh and all those presidents had to fight against people who wanted the status quo.
stonez138
05-13-2014, 07:05 PM
Development of monetary policy, saving the union. Developing the parks service, Pulling back from the brink of Neuclear winter, saving europe from hitler. Saving us from depression. Freeing slaves. Purchasing and debeloping the largest land purchase in american history. Declaring independence and busting overreaching corporate interests when needed are some fycking amazing presidential traits in that list. I am not worried that this union will stand for years to come
This.
radditsu
05-13-2014, 07:11 PM
Well the same argument could be made that they were truly evil "for their times" also. All I'm saying is that what you're taught in a history class about how great a lot of these guys were is just a cherry picking of historical facts at best. At worst its completely dishonest about what actually happened or omits any info that would shine a bad light on them. So no its not that "we can't really know history", its that you can't really trust history books. History is written by the victors after all.
Oh I agree but most post high school educated people are taught these things in college. Those stories are told because they make a good narritave that people remember. As people age and develop, if you continue to better yourself, you learn the non narratively pleasing facets of history. Such as indian cities bigger and cleaner than london. The US being agriculturally developed while we were sleeping with our shit covered pigs. It ties in with all that ancient alien bullshit. Most of our society cant get past that. But the ultimate effects of these presidents are still felt today
stonez138
05-13-2014, 07:14 PM
They were Presidents not saints...
radditsu
05-13-2014, 07:18 PM
Did you know truman loved to show people his dick? He had a giant meat hog.
radditsu
05-13-2014, 07:19 PM
They were Presidents not saints...
Saints arent saints dude.
stonez138
05-13-2014, 08:07 PM
Did you know truman loved to show people his dick? He had a giant meat hog.
I thought that was Clinton.
radditsu
05-13-2014, 08:10 PM
I thought that was Clinton.
Clinton fucked bitches. Truman just showed people his dick. Men, women, any body.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.