The Shortest R&F Thread Ever

[mmiles8]

Summary of any given R&F thread condensed into one post:

OP: Insatiable raging with a side of incoherent ambiguity.

First Page: A handful of slightly differing opinions on the OP, largely stemming from the OP's inability to communicate.

Pages Two to Three: Three simultanous, two-party block-quoted conversations nit picking the technicalities of page 1 responses to OP.

Pages Four to Six: All arguments coagulate into a mass of semantic hyperbole. Thread approaches TLDR threshold.

Pages Six and Beyond: Thread at TLDR status. Thread hijacked to guild debate. Thread dies only when a new thread reaches TLDR threshold, and the existing guild debate travels to its new host thread, where it resides as an immortal parasite until a new host thread is born.

[mmiles8]

simultaneous*

[zeval31]

flame at will, but, what is TLDR ?

[mmiles8]

Too Long Didn't Read

[Hasbinbad]

7/10

[Emoqq]

I dont know, I mean, your not flaming very much OP, this probably shouldnt be in R&F. Maybe you should communicate better as to why you feel this belongs in this section of the board?

[Supreme]

Do we have a guide section for new players?

[Aarone]

[SIZE="4"]Pages Two to Three: Three simultanous, two-party block-quoted conversations nit picking the technicalities of page 1 responses to OP.

7/10

I don't know - I really have to dispute this. Though I can't argue with the OP's logic, I really don't see what anything else has to do with that which he isn't being at all logical about in the first place.

So, I think he get's a 6/10.

[Swishahouse]

I thought it was quite lulzy!

[Humerox]

Huh?

[Excision Rottun]

THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS!

[Allizia]

I don't know - I really have to dispute this. Though I can't argue with the OP's logic, I really don't see what anything else has to do with that which he isn't being at all logical about in the first place.

So, I think he get's a 6/10.

No way, it's clearly a 7/10