Log in

View Full Version : ***OFFICIAL*** Nomination thread for worst forum poster.


Pages : 1 [2]

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 01:49 AM
26 pages and not one RL photo, RL scandal, in game drama, anything, blue rnf fucking sucks
thread is only 7 pages long, noob.

Kagatob
06-27-2013, 01:50 AM
Is that better?

It's official. Kogatabs confirmed butthurt HBB

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 01:52 AM
just to be clear, you do not have to vote for who you nominate, the point of getting more is to have a larger playing field when voting actually happens so that there are no excuses. we need some seconds up in here or i will deem the community to have "not given any fucks" and forget about this. If this contest is important to you, time to start telling your friends to vote!

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 01:53 AM
It's official, hasbinbad does not have me on ignore! :)
i click "view post" every single time

Nirgon
06-27-2013, 03:04 AM
HBB, I think after seeing Heartbrand tout himself as a "diamond card player" and proceed to make a fool out of himself, you might reconsider his admittance.

Requiemz
06-27-2013, 03:16 AM
Harrisons pretty fucking toxic with all his fucking nonsense

Faerie
06-27-2013, 03:30 AM
just to be clear, you do not have to vote for who you nominate, the point of getting more is to have a larger playing field when voting actually happens so that there are no excuses. we need some seconds up in here or i will deem the community to have "not given any fucks" and forget about this. If this contest is important to you, time to start telling your friends to vote!

Hasbinbad, requiring "seconds" in the first place was a mistake. That a person needs two votes before we can even consider voting for them is kinda ridiculous :/

And stop with the red discrimination. I know we're generally excellent posters when compared to you bluebies, but I promise you that there are one or two red posters that just might be able to compete with you for worst poster.

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 10:54 AM
Fairy, if you think your standing in the community warrants it, you're welcome to bottomline a different contest instead of trying to co-opt the one I've started. Also, nothing wrong with anti-red discrimination, they are only 1/3 or 2/3 persons.

big league chew
06-27-2013, 11:34 AM
ur all terrible

grats i guess

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 01:42 PM
just to be clear, you do not have to vote for who you nominate, the point of getting more is to have a larger playing field when voting actually happens so that there are no excuses. we need some seconds up in here or i will deem the community to have "not given any fucks" and forget about this. If this contest is important to you, time to start telling your friends to vote!

so basically you're saying this only happens if you deem it worthy to be? shenanigans!
you only need two options to have a poll. follow through with this because those who have been seconded have been seconded by the community to be in the poll. follow through with the poll.

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 01:46 PM
I want to, but if the community deems that zero fucks should be given, then in good faith I have to abide by their will.

The original contract was for a dirty dozen. If the community cries out for less, then so be it, but I cannot make that decision for the community.

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 01:47 PM
If anyones nominations or seconds are not currently reflected in my sig, please say so and I will fix it.

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 01:59 PM
I want to, but if the community deems that zero fucks should be given, then in good faith I have to abide by their will.

The original contract was for a dirty dozen. If the community cries out for less, then so be it, but I cannot make that decision for the community.

you're a coward to ask that twelve be nominated and seconded. go through with the poll and people will still vote on it. at the same time you purposefully limited the nomination and seconding process to be a once only, be it a nomination or seconding. this poll is inherently flawed by its establishing process. you're hipster faggotry shining here.

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 01:59 PM
i second all those not seconded

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 02:17 PM
ahlgador, i'm gonna say the same shit to you that i said to that red reject fairy

If you think you can run a better poll, be my guest. Nothing in what I am doing prevents you from doing anything. Yet you come and try and hate on my good faith covenant with the community. lol sad life.

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 02:18 PM
if you don't like what I'm doing, y u spend so much time analyzing it?

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 05:28 PM
GM please close and / or delete this thread as this is no longer an active iteration of this nomination process.

radditsu
06-27-2013, 07:25 PM
Seconding a nomination is pretty standard in a nomination process. . .just sayin

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 07:32 PM
Seconding a nomination is pretty standard in a nomination process. . .just sayin
This thread is defunct and should no longer be posted in.

radditsu
06-27-2013, 07:42 PM
I believe in you tho.

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 07:44 PM
That faith is well placed my son, never fear.

radditsu
06-27-2013, 07:45 PM
Yay!

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 07:52 PM
ahlgador, i'm gonna say the same shit to you that i said to that red reject fairy

If you think you can run a better poll, be my guest. Nothing in what I am doing prevents you from doing anything. Yet you come and try and hate on my good faith covenant with the community. lol sad life.

why would i waste my time running a poll? how did you think of to do that with yours is a better question?

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 07:59 PM
why would i waste my time running a poll? how did you think of to do that with yours is a better question?
how did you think of to do that with yours
how did you think of to do that with yours

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 08:01 PM
key word is "how". as in what was your thought process of determining how said time should be spent. going to avoid answering it?

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 08:01 PM
I thought of to do this with mine by picking a number and asking if the community would participate. I decided on seconding because that is standard. You can only nominate once because i wanted more people involved so 3 trolls don't run the same echo chamber they are running in faerie's thread right now.

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 08:02 PM
if the community took issue with any of that, it was malleable, but only you and faerie are whining, so it's funnier to just make fun of u.

Kagatob
06-27-2013, 08:03 PM
Obligatory animepicturetrollpost.

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 08:07 PM
http://i.imgur.com/v6Cc7ZL.jpg

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 08:28 PM
I thought of to do this with mine by picking a number and asking if the community would participate. I decided on seconding because that is standard. You can only nominate once because i wanted more people involved so 3 trolls don't run the same echo chamber they are running in faerie's thread right now.

if the community took issue with any of that, it was malleable, but only you and faerie are whining, so it's funnier to just make fun of u.

my complaint is against you're backing out and not following through with running the poll. finish what you start kind of thing.

in regards to the echo chamber, that's all that's going to happen on this forum.

the clown is as tied to the monkey as the monkey is to the clown.

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 08:31 PM
and you accuse me of cartesianism .. lol

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 08:44 PM
and you accuse me of cartesianism .. lol

i did.

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 08:45 PM
and you accuse me of cartesianism .. lol

also, the basis of this statement is from?

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 08:47 PM
also, the basis of this statement is from?
well i guess if you don't know the answer to that you probably shouldn't be using the term.

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 08:50 PM
well i guess if you don't know the answer to that you probably shouldn't be using the term.

the assumptive speaks again. do you think that descartes would be proud of you?

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 08:52 PM
you're the one who used the term lol

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 08:53 PM
enjoy your philo class a bit too much? lulz. if you cant explain what you mean without resorting to jargon which necessitate explanation, you don't understand what you're talking about well enough. that's some chomsky for you.

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 08:53 PM
common english works perfectly well without references; nobody is impressed.

Ahldagor
06-27-2013, 08:57 PM
enjoy your philo class a bit too much? lulz. if you cant explain what you mean without resorting to jargon which necessitate explanation, you don't understand what you're talking about well enough. that's some chomsky for you.

what jargon was used that you didn't understand?

still stuck in cartesian models


while i appreciate the depth of your criticism, and am not arguing the fact of the matter (in fact i would say that all modern people can in some way be viewed from this perspective), i question the foundation. what, specifically, are you referring to? my reference to a knack?

you understood what i said

Hasbinbad
06-27-2013, 10:22 PM
i did but that is only because i have also been indoctrinated

Ahldagor
06-28-2013, 04:18 PM
http://cdn.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/storm-troopers-dumbo.gif