Lron - Complete SOB

[Reapin]

There are some comments I need to make regarding Lron. You see, I indeed believe that just thinking about Lron's complacent exegeses is giving me a two-Tylenol headache. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that Lron is unconstrained by conscience. For that reason, he asserts that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence.

One of the great mysteries of modern life is, Where do we go from here? My answer is, as always, a model of clarity and the soul of wit: I don't know. However, I do know that Lron's stories about antagonism are particularly ridden with errors and distortions, even leaving aside the concept's initial implausibility. Lron says that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that he has the trappings of deity.

Lron likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why his cultic aping of the worst classes of costive fiends there are indicates that Lron carries nothing but hatred and destruction in his heart. No joke.

I realize that ethnocentrism is a tremendous problem in our society, but does it constantly have to be thrown in our faces? To ask that question another way, why can't Lron simply enjoy the fruits of his own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs? The answer is obvious if you understand that given the amount of misinformation that Lron is circulating, I must point out that I keep telling him that his every utterance drips with know-it-all condescension and sarcasm. Sure, a nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse, but perhaps if I'm persistent, Lron will eventually realize that I used to avouch that he was a savage freebooter. However, after seeing how Lron wants to condition the public to accept violence as normal and desirable, I now have an even lower opinion of him. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that no matter how bad you think Lron's outbursts are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. If we don't develop an alternative community, a cohesive and comprehensive underground with a charter to promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad, , right now, then Lron's memoranda will soon start to metastasize until they revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era. I will not say what is right and what is wrong when it comes to Lron's tirades. But I will say one thing: Lron insists that merit is adequately measured by his methods and qualifications. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.

I cannot think of any satisfactory rationale Lron could put forward that would justify his decision to break down our communities. To top that off, I know more about totalitarianism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that Lron had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, he gave us insurrectionism, alcoholism, and Jacobinism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Lron's petulant, delirious rejoinders, and the light represents the goal of teaching misguided, moonstruck tyrants about tolerance.)

Lron lives for one reason and for one reason only: to demand special treatment that, in many cases, borders on the ridiculous. It's debatable whether I shall make every effort, especially in this limited space, to eschew phlegmatic serfism. However, no one can disagree that I frequently talk about how Lron, in his hubris, has decided that he has the right to silence truth-tellers like me. I would drop the subject except that if he can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If he can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it. Lron is firmly convinced that libertinism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. His belief is controverted, however, by the weight of the evidence indicating that Lron insists that his declamations can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. How can he be so blind? Very easily. Basically, our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to nourish children with good morals and self-esteem, we must shatter the adage that his accusations won't be used for political retribution. I consider that requirement a small price to pay because there is a simple answer to the question of what to do about Lron's grievances. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must carve solutions that are neither disorganized nor nocent.

Let us not sink to Lron's level. Let us combat ruffianism by exercising our right to speak out, to denounce Lron's perorations as totally unrepresentative of the values of this society. Lron has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that some time ago I conducted a series of in-depth interviews in which I discovered that most respondents clearly don't want him to create a goofy world of guilt and shame. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying his repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why Lron has been supplying the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. How can he perpetrate such an outrage against public propriety and decency? Many people consider that question irrelevant on the grounds that Lron argues that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: A surprisingly large number of antihumanist schlumps consider him to be their savior. This overwhelmingly positive view of Lron is obviously not shared by those who have been victims of Lron's soliloquies or by those who believe that if Lron doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to create a one-world government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to his agenda, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Lron will grasp the concept that bitterness seeps out of him like blood from an underdone ribeye steak. That extreme bitterness is, as far as I can tell, what leads Lron to grant craven rabiators the keys to the kingdom.

Under these conditions, if one dares to criticize even a single tenet of Lron's stances, one is promptly condemned as detestable, power-hungry, renitent, or whatever epithet Lron deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation. Although he obviously hates my guts (and probably yours as well), I can't make heads or tails of his pronouncements. I mean, does Lron want to promulgate partisan prejudice against others, or doesn't he?

Lron's tactics include personally attacking various individuals for whom I have a great deal of respect. That is to say, I undeniably dislike Lron. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that some people profess that Lron can't control his desire to have everything he wants and to have it now. Others aver that Lron has inherited the whole of his little stock of phrases and notions, which he is pleased to call "ideas", from what I call ugly quacksalvers. In the interest of clearing up the confusion I'll make the following observation: Lron spouts a lot of numbers whenever he wants to make a point. He then subjectively interprets those numbers to support his hijinks while ignoring the fact that he's being a noxious skybald just for the sake of being a noxious skybald. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper because it's the news that just doesn't fit. It should be clear by this point that purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of Lron's churlish communiqués. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how Lron contends that his traducements will spread enlightenment to the masses, nurture democracy, reestablish the bonds of community, bring us closer to God, and generally work to the betterment of Man and society and that, therefore, a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces slaphappy fussbudgets (as distinct from the inarticulate mingy-types who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that Lron has achieved sainthood. In reality, contrariwise, it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Lron's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Does Lron enjoy the dubious cachet of being the world's most bloodthirsty bigamist?" It's questions like that that sincerely get people thinking about how no one has a higher opinion of Lron than I, and I think Lron is a sniffish recidivist.

Lron should get with the program. Alas, I usually get a lot of blank stares from people when I say something like that. What I mean is that Lron's self-fulfilling prophecies should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Lron's escapades are intended to terrorize our youngsters." Although it requires risk, commitment, and follow-through to address the continued social injustice shown by dodgy nudniks, what we're seeing is a domino effect of events that started with him stating that he is a man of peace. That prevarication incited his vassals to use organized violence to suppress opposition. The most abhorrent vocabularians I've ever seen reacted, in turn, by authorizing, promoting, celebrating, and legitimizing spineless commercialism. The next domino to fall, not surprisingly, was a widespread increase in onanism, and that's the event that galvanized me to tell everyone that if we look beyond Lron's delusions of grandeur, we see that he thinks we want him to glamorize drug usage. Excuse me, but maybe one of his patsies keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that Lron's credos are intelligent, commonsensical, and entirely consonant with the views of ordinary people. The studies are full of "if"s, "possibly"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that Lron says that the rigors that his victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that he should slither back under whatever rock he crawled out from. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me convince the government to clamp down hard on his subliminal psywar campaigns. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because Lron's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are his promises. In fact, if you don't think that Lron's allies give Lron credit for things he hasn't done, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. Let me conclude by expressing the hope that by reading this letter you have learned the life lesson, "Always treat the disease, not the symptoms."

[Hasbinbad]

Don't encourage him.

[Reapin]

Lron either is or elects to be ignorant of scientific principles and methods. He even intentionally misuses scientific terminology to cement the foundation of our currently metastasizing police state into the law of the land. Whenever he's presented with the statement that stopping him is front and center in my work, he spews out the hackneyed excuse that he's a tribune of the oppressed. Ironically, such screwball logic is likely to convince even more people that whenever I hear Lron's servitors witter on about how if Lron kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick, I interpret this poppycock as an implicit request for chemical treatment of their rampant (and generally unacknowledged) Asperger syndrome.

If you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, I don't enjoy Lron's bawdy sense of humor. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, a colleague recently informed me that a bunch of surly individuals and others in Lron's amen corner are about to excoriate attempts to bring questions of cameralism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing. I have no reason to doubt that story because if you think you can escape from Lron's rambunctious campaigns, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that he is entirely versipellous. When Lron is among plebeians, he warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against miserabilism. But when he's safely surrounded by his hangers-on, Lron instructs them to inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion in otherwise open-minded people. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that we must tell Lron how wrong he is. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that Lron should stop telling everyone that his declamations are innovative. More apt words for them might be "static" or "stale" or perhaps even the phrase, "been done" with the possible addition, "too often." What I'm getting at is that we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Lron does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why Lron likes saying that we should all bear the brunt of his actions. Okay, that's a parody—but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Lron intends to put his untrustworthy imperium in charge of defiling the present and destroying the future. We should not stand for that, with that, or by that. Rather, we should make it clear that Lron keeps missing my point. More specifically, he keeps getting hung up on my words without seeing the underlying meaning. For example, when I say that statistical details released by a third-party agency indicate that those of us whose minds are not narcotized still remember Lron's frequent outbreaks of savagery, Lron seems incapable of realizing that what I'm really getting at is that it's often hard to decipher his dodgy comments. Obviously, Lron flees clarity whenever it involves unpleasant shouldering of responsibility, but I avouch that in this case, he is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon without any real morality, without a soul.

I pause to note that Lron would have us believe that matters of racial justice should enter a period of "benign neglect". To be honest, he has never actually said that explicitly, but if you follow his logic—what little there is—you'll see that this is his real point. Now the surprising news: You, of course, now need some hard evidence that one immanent characteristic of his cop-outs is that they gag free speech. Well, how about this for evidence: There is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Lron's essays from the first word to the last. If I had to choose between chopping onions and helping Lron carry our once-proud nation deeper into savagery and depravity, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant. Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is that failure to recognize this salient point will result in Lron's getting free reign to let polyloquent deviationists serve as our overlords. That's clear. But when Lron's opuscula are challenged, he usually responds by battening on the credulity of the ignorant. Well, you can't really expect him to defend his positions with facts, explanations, logical arguments, or even references to events that occurred less than two years ago, can you?

During the first half of the 20th century, sectarianism could have been practically identified with Maoism. Today, it is not so clear who can properly be called a spleenful, repulsive braggadocio. Viewed from all angles, if we let Lron detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity—family, class, private associations—then greed, corruption, and collectivism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions.

This probably does not affect your daily life, but it is a fact. Lron's list of sins is long and each one deserves more space than I have here. Therefore, rather than describe each one individually, I'll summarize by stating that he has gotten a bit too palsy-walsy with dimwitted oligarchs. I'm not saying that facetiously; as people who know me undeniably realize, I always mean what I say and say what I mean. They also realize that Lron is interpersonally exploitative. That is, he takes advantage of others to achieve his own randy ends. Why does he do that? All I can do now is give you a bare-bones answer and then let you dig into it yourself. To understand the basic answer you need to realize that there are three fairly obvious problems with Lron's conceits, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to do what comes naturally. First, the op-ed pieces, fulminations, and philosophies that Lron is trying to tattoo on our minds are not educational but unsophisticated. Second, Lron's birdbrained apologists have been hunting the blogosphere in packs, swarming, intimidating, and spreading outright lies and propaganda while enforcing pressure on blog owners and administrators to apotheosize the most lusk tin-pot tyrants I've ever seen. And third, Lron's nostrums would have more impact if they were more concise and organized. Instead of trying to be as clear as possible to get his point across, Lron seems to like bandying about all types of fancy terms that no one's ever heard and that completely diminish his point.

While some information provided by Lron's partisans may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or amateurish ultimata. One of the enduring effects of Lron's hypnopompic insights is surely the way they will insult my intelligence. I suggest that we bring meaning, direction, and purpose into our lives. This right and truthful proposition, practically established, will help us raise a stink about Lron and his stinking epigrams. He likes to cite poll results that "prove" that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that he can dole out or retract. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that one of Lron's favorite tricks is to create a problem, then offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to misdirect, discredit, disrupt, and otherwise neutralize his adversaries, never the original problem.

The last time I heard Lron ramble on in his characteristically bibulous blather he said something about wanting to fuel the fires of hatred. I feel sorry for the human race when I hear stuff like that. What I think—and I'm no specialist—is that his adherents say, "Lron is a voice of probity." Yes, I'm afraid they really do talk like that. It's the only way for them to conceal that Lron's latest manifesto, like all the ones that preceded it, is a consummate anthology of disastrously bad writing teeming with misquotations and inaccuracies, an odyssey of anecdotes that are occasionally entertaining but certainly not informative. He should think about how his scribblings lead vulgar smatchets to marginalize and eventually even outlaw responsible critics of the most raffish disinformation artists you'll ever see. If Lron doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet. Animalism revolves in a fixed orbit around all of his cankered words. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. Lron does, and that's why if I hear his admirers say, "I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication" one more time, I'm doubtlessly going to throw up.

One of the great mysteries of modern life is, Does Lron realize he's more stultiloquent than a grotty, biggety wing nut? While that question may not be as profound as "What's the meaning of life?" or "Is there a God?", Lron is decidedly up to something. I don't know exactly what, but the tone of his traducements is eerily reminiscent of that of dictatorial patrioteers of the late 1940s in the sense that honor means nothing to him. Principles mean nothing to him. All he cares about is how best to violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains.

I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but Lron's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that he constantly insists that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. But he contradicts himself when he says that it is his moral imperative to plunge us into the dark abyss of annihilation. Lron's claim that his crimes are victimless requires a willing suspension of disbelief, an ability to set logic aside and accept any preposterous notion that Lron throws at us. We mustn't be content to patch and darn, to piece and cobble at the worn and rotten fabric of his pertinacious adages. Instead we must compile readers' remarks and suggestions and use them to show some backbone. When describing Lron's ideas, words like "worthless" roll easily off the tongue. In view of that, it is not surprising that for many people, Lron's wishy-washy, inconsiderate prank phone calls have caused substantial pain and suffering, mental anguish, emotional distress, post-traumatic stress, sleeplessness, indignities and embarrassment, degradation, injury to reputation, and restrictions on personal freedom. Whew! The only thing they haven't yet caused, surprisingly, is a greater realization that Lron does not appeal to most people as being the most endearing or public-minded of citizens. Maybe his image would improve somewhat if he stopped trying to threaten, degrade, poison, bulldoze, and kill this world of ours. I think I've dished it out to Lron as best as I can in this letter. I hope you now understand why I say that characterizing his allocutions as cheeky or pushy does not derogate from their seriousness or their frightening ability to preach a propaganda of hate.

[Reapin]

Given that Lron's power-drunk, obtuse allocutions are based on a jungle mentality of mistrust, betrayal, and disloyalty, he is presumptively eager to scrap the notion of national sovereignty. Lron plans to make mountains out of molehills any day now. I'd like to see him try to get away with such a plan; that should be good for a laugh. You see, most people have already observed that the problem with Lron is not that he's overbearing. It's that he wants to take us all back to the Stone Age. There is absolutely nothing that inane whiners like him will not do to destroy their opponents. They will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until their truffle-searching instinct digs up some loopy incident that is calculated to finish off their unfortunate victim.

In the end, the most telling thing is that I am fed up to the back teeth with Lron's scabrous pronouncements. And here, I insist, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in Lron's communications. Lron recently began forcing us to do things or take stands against our will. Once again, he has made a mockery of his pledge not to be so refractory. It's too bad that Lron lacks the decency to admit that almost every day, he outreaches himself in setting new records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It's honestly breathtaking to watch him.

There is historical precedent for Lron's adages. Specifically, for as far back as I can remember, he has been blowing the whole situation way out of proportion. Given how one bloody-minded activity always leads to another, it should come as no surprise that the biggest difference between me and Lron is that Lron wants to rip off everyone and his brother. I, on the other hand, want to complain about inerudite dorks. No matter what he thinks, if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will unmistakably find that the time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must seek liberty, equality, and fraternity. The first step in that process is to realize that just the other day, some of his conscienceless, covinous comrades forced a prospectus into my hands as I walked past. The prospectus described Lron's blueprint for a world in which besotted, lascivious undesirables are free to resort to underhanded tactics. As I dropped the prospectus onto an overflowing wastebasket I reflected upon the way that I need your help if I'm ever to guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by Lron and his peuplade. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, Lron wants me to stop trying to declare a truce with him and commence a dialogue. Instead, he'd rather I come to heel. Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily.

Lron is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon without any real morality, without a soul. It's often hard to decipher his wishy-washy comments. Obviously, Lron flees clarity whenever it involves unpleasant shouldering of responsibility, but I maintain that in this case, I once told him that he, hate-filled carpers of one sort or another, and a few decent but occasionally furciferous people are engaged in a desperate struggle for the soul of society. How did he respond to that? He proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that Lron's use of the term "labyrinthibranchiate" displays, at best, a tone deafness. The term drips with echoes of Fabianism and warns us all that Lron always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to him. Nothing else matters—except maybe to criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. I tell you this because I've never bothered Lron. Yet Lron wants to make conditions far worse than could ever have been the case without his patronizing efforts. Whatever happened to "live and let live"?

I wish I knew when Lron was planning on unleashing his next volley of pudibund sallies. Alas, I'm no Nostradamus. Nevertheless, some of my predictions have come true in spades. For instance, I predicted ages ago that Lron would devise testy scams to get money for nothing, and look what happened. Even scarier, I predicted that Lron would poison the relationship between teacher and student. Although most people doubted that prediction when I made it, they neglected to consider that Lron is not just temulent. He is unbelievably, astronomically temulent.

Lron is not as paltry or subhuman as you might think. He's more so. We obviously can't afford to let him draw unsuspecting politicos into the orbit of bleeding-heart pauteners. What I'm suggesting is that we make him answer for his wrongdoings. That's the key to looking at our situation realistically and from a viewpoint that takes in the whole picture, and it's the only way that most people will ever learn that if we let him condone universal oppression, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization. Armed only with a white shirt, pocket protector, slide rule, thick glasses, and some other neat stuff, I have determined that many of us are too naïve and trusting. It takes a lot of convincing to get us to see a person as inherently slatternly or inherently dour. Alas, Lron is doing all he can to provide us with unmistakable proof that he is inherently both. For instance, Lron says that he values our perspectives. Yet he also wants to instill distrust and thereby create a need for his stingy views. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because he likes reportages that rob, steal, cheat, and murder. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that he has had some success in leading me down a path of pain and suffering. I find that horrifying and frightening, but we all should have seen it coming. We all knew that if obstructionism were an Olympic sport, Lron would clinch the gold medal.

Lron's fusillades have created an abominable universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that our country's security, prestige, and financial interests are best served by war and the ever-present threat of war. Only within this universe does it make sense to violate the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. And, only if we debate the efficacy of his vile flimflams can we destroy this putrid, wicked universe of his and break the mold and stray from the path of conventional wisdom.

Despite the obvious fact that everything Lron tells you is a lie, Lron's yes-men do not concern themselves much with the people around them. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that Lron's prevarications are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that the moon is made of green cheese and they promote the mistaken idea that he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. Having no desire to belabor this subject, I'll just say that he secretly has been scheming to reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. This is exactly the sort of scandal that most people understand and appreciate. It's what opens people's eyes to the reality that unlike Lron, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if—and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty"—he were not actually responsible for trying to put the public peace perpetually in danger, then I'd stop saying that Lron actually believes that the sky is falling. True, Lron has a right to his opinion. In his mind, he also apparently has a right to be a lusk, quisquilious fanatic as evidenced by his endless attempts to squeeze every last drop of blood from our overworked, overtaxed bodies.

If, today, the urge of Lron's war-soul can prompt him to defile the present and destroy the future, then imagine, if you can, how that same soul will express itself through the thousandfold-more-bloodthirsty Lron of tomorrow. Everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of Lron". In it, I chronicle all of Lron's intimations from the foul to the pouty and conclude that this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about Lron's crafty behavior but about the way that savagism is part of the catechism that must be intoned by all of the unforgiving scalawags seeking entrée into Lron's lynch mob. We can therefore extrapolate that the central paradox of Lron's ideologies, the twist that makes Lron's scare tactics so irresistible to bitter prevaricators, is that these people truly believe that the most valuable skill one can have is the ability to lie convincingly. People should just treat each other with decency and respect. It follows from this that he claims that children should belong to the state. You should realize that absolutely no empirical evidence obtained by scientific means exists to support that claim. Alas, that doesn't stop Lron from inciting young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. In a nutshell, Lron's expedients are a vehicle for the expression of prejudice, ignorance, and enmity about people who are different from him.

[Taboo]

Lron has a few accounts it looks like

[Lron]

Reapin, dont be a sore loser. The people have spoken and trust me to be a guide more than they trust you. Instead of condemning me you should probably try to work with me considering i have positions open in my cabinet still.

[Ektar]

do you have a position open in your heart

[spoils]

reapin...you are a ******.

[Reapin]

reapin...you are a ******.



I wish! I hate working.

[Strifer]

I wish! I hate working.

http://i.imgur.com/MV8RyhE.gif

[Rhambuk]

The people have spoken and trust me to be a guide

laughable.

Sorry reapin, I could not see any point in reading that much information on lron. I'm amazed anyone has ever thought about him long enough to write something that long and detailed...

[Kagatob]

reapin...you are a ******.

I wish! I hate working.

http://i.imgur.com/MV8RyhE.gif

[Servellious]

Shortness of breath wall of text

[Strifer]

Reap is a cool dude, he fights for justice and makes giggleworthy racial undertones.

If i were a kindergarten teacher I would give u a gold star on your chart. And let you high five the milkman when he comes in to bring drinks for snacktime.

[Messianic]

All I saw was lots of words and I got bored

[Reapin]

laughable.

Sorry reapin, I could not see any point in reading that much information on lron. I'm amazed anyone has ever thought about him long enough to write something that long and detailed...



I didn't read any of that myself, but you know Lron read every word.

http://www.pakin.org/complaint

[myriverse]

TL;DR -- Lron is more interesting when talking about himself.

[Rhambuk]

I didn't read any of that myself, but you know Lron read every word.

http://www.pakin.org/complaint

lol, great troll