Chira numbuh wan!

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Supposedly Snopes had a mission statement something to the effect of “to demonstrate how unbiased we are, none of our staff are allowed to donate to political causes” or something to that effect

But the first few staff members this guy checked, all donated to Dems. I knew Snopes was biased when they never once mentioned anything about the Jussie Smolette hoax. That was big news back in the day. Had he been a Repub, they’d have been all over it

Where I heard this about the donations is linked below. Now did this have a role to play in FB’s decision? Did they catch wind that Snopes staff was donating to Dems? Who knows:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=

Let's play Jenga

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can you make a narrative from this without the youtube man doing it for you?

[Reiwa]

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Concern_troll

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's play Jenga

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can you make a narrative from this without the youtube man doing it for you?

Lol heck no, I don’t have that kinda time. Was YouTube man wrong? The list pics are blurry on my phone

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol heck no, I don’t have that kinda time. Was YouTube man wrong? The list pics are blurry on my phone

All that is beside the point anyway.

If Cider were a consistent logician, he'd recognize it as an ad hominem attack that has very little to do with the claims and counterarguments they present.

Discrediting the source is not discrediting the claim.

[Reiwa]

At least he isn't trading the Uyghurs for fentanyl yet

Maybe later for a second time.

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

At least he isn't trading the Uyghurs for fentanyl yet

Maybe later for a second time.

He’s trying to talk Trump out of his crazy proclamation that he’s going to war with the cartels. As we know China is their supplier of precursor chemicals

I think it’s noble but crazy to say you are going to war with the cartels. It’s like you had two big ASSes attempts in one year and want a bigger target on your back? And what are you going to do? Drone and bomb the living shit out of Mexico? The cartels here run and hide already for self-preservation. Go ahead and root them out but if you want a “war” with the cartels it would have to take place in Mexico

[Botten]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

HeÂ’s trying to talk Trump out of his crazy proclamation that heÂ’s going to war with the cartels. As we know China is their supplier of precursor chemicals

I think it’s noble but crazy to say you are going to war with the cartels. It’s like you had two big ASSes attempts in one year and want a bigger target on your back? And what are you going to do? Drone and bomb the living shit out of Mexico? The cartels here run and hide already for self-preservation. Go ahead and root them out but if you want a “war” with the cartels it would have to take place in Mexico

We all meet our maker in our own way.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He’s trying to talk Trump out of his crazy proclamation that he’s going to war with the cartels. As we know China is their supplier of precursor chemicals

I think it’s noble but crazy to say you are going to war with the cartels. It’s like you had two big ASSes attempts in one year and want a bigger target on your back? And what are you going to do? Drone and bomb the living shit out of Mexico? The cartels here run and hide already for self-preservation. Go ahead and root them out but if you want a “war” with the cartels it would have to take place in Mexico

If going against the cartel is too dangerous for a US president to do because of the danger of the cartel assassinating our president, then we should definitely go after the cartel.

[Ekco]

the war with cartels is our next Afghanistan, or we can go back to the ME if you prefer instead. but we gotta have one forever war going at all times, it's kinda important for our economy.

[Ciderpress]

I think the term "war" might be somewhat figurative. I don't think he wants to actually literally bomb mexico. It's like "I'm going to war with gluten!!"