If you didn't buy Bitcoin at $40,000...

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty sure the whole circumventing is what they mean. /jury

Also wherever there is +GDP there is winning. Where you from?

If they intended it to mean that, they would have written it to mean that.

The word circumvent does not nor do any of its derivatives appear in the text.

They are free to alter it to say that at any time, but they have not done so.

It would be improper and far too forward to make assumptions like the one you suggest.

"We can only interpret the rule as stated by the text that we have at hand".

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm pretty sure expressing an opinion on GDP is "participating in political discussion" which is banned here, yet botten is not banned.

Like half the forum is currently banned, but not botten. Would love a rule clarification here.

bwahahah Gross Domestic Product... plays a factor with Bitcoin and other crypto; definitely on topic even.

economic gains... wealth... financial increases... etc

How do you always do this to yourself? The self-owns constantly.

Thought you said you were going to stop circumventing?

[Ooloo]

Discussions of GDP and crypto are highly political and contentious. How are they not?

Again: What is the actual god damn rule here? I'm happy to follow it, if I know what it actually is!

[Ooloo]

Here is the exact verbiage of my current ban:

"Participating in political discussions on the forum. Please use another plateform for that."

How are you not doing that right now?

Tell me the rule and I'll follow the rule. If the rule makes no sense I will probably break the rule.

[Botten]

Why are you doing this to yourself don't discuss any of this here. Seriously??

You are now admitting to what you are doing? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Being helpful here if you can delete your above post.

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is the exact verbiage of my current ban:

"Participating in political discussions on the forum. Please use another plateform for that."

How are you not doing that right now?

Tell me the rule and I'll follow the rule. If the rule makes no sense I will probably break the rule.

I'm different than that. I don't recognize any of these newjack *soy moderators as legitimate heirs to Rogean's EQ Empire.

*soy means dodging in old EQ ventrilo chat

[Castle2.0]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I will happily abide by forum rules that are applied consistently. I'm not a fan of nebulous confusing rules that nobody understands.

Welcome to Project1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Crepido]

i too would like to know why some people do and others don't get banned, when both sides are participating in the same thread and egging eachother on.

seems to me there is a bias of some sort 🤷

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Crepido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i too would like to know why some people do and others don't get banned, when both sides are participating in the same thread and egging eachother on.

seems to me there is a bias of some sort 🤷

Hi Elizondo... you going to answer for Crepido again?

Crepido's Question
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=1237

Response to Question
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=1239

Elizondo's responds to Response
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=1241

[Crepido]

This is just me. I am not anyone else on this forum. I'd bet money on this and let owners of this domain verify it.

My point or statement rather, still stands though. I've been reading these back and forth shittalks for years now, it makes for great entertainment while taking a shit.

And what i do know, for 100% certainty, is that you Botten should had also been banned among all those others if it was over talking politics. So the question remains, what are the exact criterias ?