Time for a minimum level to roll for Scout

[Jimjam]

‘Can contribute’ while seeming a fair bar is a very low one.

[truavatar2]

46+

[darkreap]

52+ gets my vote, anon/role must be off

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by darkreap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

52+ gets my vote, anon/role must be off

It’s pretty easily tanked even by a 51, for that reason I am more inclined with the suggestion of 46+ (which also nicely aligns with the hardcodes entry gate for planes etc).

[snapp]

Either 46+ or 50+ sounds good to me.

[Krinkill]

It seems like the majority wants the new rule in place, how do we go about actually making it a new rule?

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Krinkill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It seems like the majority wants the new rule in place, how do we go about actually making it a new rule?

The forum doesn't matter at all: it comes down to the people at Scout.

If everyone at the roll agrees (before rolling) to respect the minimum level, then that becomes the rule ... for that roll.

If people keep doing that for X days (the staff has never said what "X" is), it becomes a permanent player agreement.

... or at least, that's how we originally got similar player agreements (eg. Shady/Angry Goblin).

[busted]

Some suggestions:

0. un-written rule, everyone start not helping people lower than 46.
1. Make a new thread with a poll and link it here for people to vote on
2. Everyone make a hotkey or speak about these ideas at every scout roll
3. Share results and this thread with CSR in the blue UN discord server
4. Victory, we can now lose the roll to people above 46!

[Knuckle]

Make western wastes pvp enabled, but you can only attack people under
Level 46. Problem solved!

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Knuckle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Make western wastes pvp enabled, but you can only attack people under
Level 46. Problem solved!

This would be hilarious