Fear/Hate Training rules

[Lostprophets]

Just my 2cp here..

I think it's reasonable to Propose Option D - Make people clear the zone and not train period in Fear (when other guilds are around...you see a guild forming up...don't dare start up that bard kite). there's a no train policy in the PnP, let's as a server enforce it in Fear on a CT Pop.

Once the Devs fix the CT DT Cycle, it's going to be an absolute clusterf-ck again otherwise.

Back in the Transcendence vs. IB days it was a race to clear as fast as possible (no kiting involved) and the First Guild to have 2 Golems down wins First shot at CT... In the uncommon circumstance that 3 guilds each get a golem it should be First FTE on Draco and Successfully Kill him...they get first shot at CT...would be kinda cool to bring that policy back for repops and such as it was one from when Fear first opened on P99.

[Splorf22]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A B & C are all correct statements

what am i going to do? i'm going to sit back and either A) watch kids get wiped because they dont understand how fear works, or B) watch kids move out of the way because they do understand how fear works.

Sirken I would appreciate a really clear answer to this: if 'kid guild x' is at the west wall, and they get social aggro from a kite and therefore are trained, will the training player/guild be suspended or not?

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sirken I would appreciate a really clear answer to this: if 'kid guild x' is at the west wall, and they get social aggro from a kite and therefore are trained, will the training player/guild be suspended or not?

fraps it, petition it, and i'll look at it with at least one other staff member.

if it looks intentional, yes.

if it looks like "kid guild x" put themselves in harms way to purposely get another guild banned, no.


im not going to punish players because other players are too stubborn or too dumb to not play in traffic.


clear enough?

<3
Sirks

[Splorf22]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

im not going to punish players because other players are too stubborn or too dumb to not play in traffic

You keep using this traffic analogy and I have no idea why. First, mobs and players can cover every inch of the zone; they are not restricted to concrete roads. Second, if you hit someone with your car you are responsible. Period. It doesn't matter if they were playing in traffic or not.

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You keep using this traffic analogy and I have no idea why. First, mobs and players can cover every inch of the zone; they are not restricted to concrete roads. Second, if you hit someone with your car you are responsible. Period. It doesn't matter if they were playing in traffic or not.

/facepalm. let me try again

fraps it, petition it, and i'll look at it with at least one other staff member.

if it looks intentional, yes.

if it looks like "kid guild x" put themselves in harms way to purposely get another guild banned, no.

im not going to punish players because other players are too stubborn or too dumb to avoid putting themselves in harms way. you have two choices; if you dont want to play on a server with other guilds go play InstancedRotationBox, or, L2PoF

clear enough?

<3
Sirks


edit- and for the record, if some dummy is playing in traffic and i hit him with my truck, he deserves whatever happens to him, and i wouldnt even slow down to see if he was ok. stupid people shouldnt be catered to, it only encourages them to continue their stupid behavior.