#11
|
|||
|
Ro would occasionally resist on live on the best geared targets, but almost never after a sundering.
A larger issue is the very large number of FR nuke resists and non partials. It seems the partial window is very small (like you go from full damage to full resist in the span of 40fr). On live you almost never saw a full damage nuke on a geared target, but you saw many low partials before a sundering, and 50%-80% partials after a sundering. Full resists were very rare. Same goes for mage nukes. Personally I don't care of RO lands at all if FR nukes get fixed. | ||
#12
|
|||
|
I've resisted plenty of B'ro's with about 180~, I feel like they land less then they are resisted.
| ||
#13
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
#14
|
||||
|
Wizards in decent Kunark gear were able to easily resist Breath of Ro. I never looked for the exact threshold but Breath of Ro wouldn't ever land on Tyva.
__________________
Quote:
| |||
#15
|
||||
|
Quote:
BoR used to always be resisted on live, on both npcs and pc's, but NEVER resisted here.
__________________
Xblade & Magicite, p99 Red
| |||
#16
|
|||
|
wrong ^ resisted plenty of times @ 180, feel like it lands less then it is resisted. your not even level 60 yet?
| ||
#17
|
|||
|
is this fixed?
| ||
#19
|
|||
|
This and bane of nife could use a resist level required decrease of about 20.
| ||
#20
|
||||
|
Debuffs in general should land at a higher rate than actual nukes. It is a really complicated concept but if a debuff spell is resisted at the same rate as a nuke then you would never need to cast the debuff because the fire nuke would have already landed at that level of resist. Hope this clears it all up.
However if anyone has a great memory from when they were 9 years old I'm sure some dev would probably take your word as gospel and adjust the resist levels to be more in line with what you remember from grade school.
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
|