#11
|
|||
|
yeah, its a beneficial spell. As an ench i remember fighting in Velious and dispelling people who had kos mobs on them, which normally werent kos to me, and the mobs would become kos to me, ie like if i healed them.
Also could dispell people in safe zones since considered benefical | ||
#12
|
|||
|
I remember using both the single target and group dispell as a bard, and it always removed buffs/debuffs as it should. Both on players grouped with me and those not.
__________________
“Smile, breathe, and go slowly.”
| ||
#13
|
|||
|
Never got steel golem wand (instant right click pillage enchantment) resisted either. I used that thing countless times and never one resist.
__________________
| ||
#14
|
||||
|
Quote:
Either way, it seems the counter theory was right, and that's definitely not what I remember from classic. Any dispel spell just dispelled a set number of magic-based effects, starting from the first buff to the right. I believe the dispel mechanic itself works as it should on p99, the stuff in the spell files on the wiki is just there because it was copy-pasted from the modern spell data on Zam/Lucy. The resist thing should be fixed, of course. | |||
Last edited by Bockscar; 10-06-2011 at 07:30 AM..
|
#15
|
|||
|
Its the Mac server stuck in PoP, yeah.
And I dont go to zam/lucy to get my spell data, we have our own custom spell data site that was put together years ago by a member that shows all the pre buff/pre revamp spell data info. It (the original spell info) has those counter things on it too. I dunno, Taper Enchantment does also have a different sound file attached to it then all other dispells. Maybe Taper Enchantment is just some odd ball mostly broken spell. | ||
#16
|
|||
|
I don't know then. I know pumice always dispelled 2 slots and that dispels should not be resistable. Can't think of anything that the numbers in parantheses would be for. A level modifier shouldn't matter, there was no variance to the dispel mechanic. Stuff like Nagafen's AoE dispel also has the Cancel Magic (9) thingy, for instance.
Back on SZ during Luclin and PoP, one of my friends played an enchanter. He used the low-level dispel a lot in PvP because it was useful for dispelling Winged Death (there were retarded amounts of mid-50s druids to fight when you were evil) because it only dispelled one slot. He didn't have any insta-clickies so he had to junk buff with actual spells, and the 1-slot dispel was useful for preserving those buffs while dispelling the first slot. The only comment on Allakhazam for Taper Enchantment mentions that it reduces the duration of whatever buff it hits. It's from November 2003, during LDoN, which sounds like about the time they changed a number of PvP mechanics. It's possible that this particular spell did work like that (though well enough to counter WD effectively) but I'm sure the other dispels were actual dispels. I have no recollection of ever seeing pumice fail to dispel two buffs/debuffs. | ||
Last edited by Bockscar; 10-06-2011 at 08:55 AM..
|
#17
|
|||
|
taper shortened duration, thats why no one used it when cancel magic just erased them.
| ||
#18
|
|||
|
Cancel Magic - No Resist Check
Annul Magic - MR Pillage Enchantment MR + 5 Alenia's Disenchanting Melody (Bard) - No MR check Nullify Magic - MR + 5 Recant Magic - MR Strip Enchantment - MR + 25 Taper Enchantment - No Resist Check All of these are listed as Positive (Beneficial) spells except for Alenia's and Taper Enchantment. I don't know how this worked on live but I'm assuming if these spells are marked Beneficial here they will be broken. When trying to cast the spell on a mob/duel PC you would just receive the message "Your spell would not take hold". | ||
#19
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
Last edited by pickled_heretic; 10-06-2011 at 12:02 PM..
|
#20
|
|||
|
yeah i dont remember ever having a nullify/pumice/wand/dispel ever resisted by a player.
| ||
|
|