Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 10-01-2024, 12:31 AM
shovelquest shovelquest is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
By definition, any system you propose will have winners and losers.
Yeah no doi. That's why they want to get points so the more losses they have wont continue to accrue while some rich kid gets it first time.

It's called sociaism.

Why do you right wingers hate socialism!!
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 10-01-2024, 01:22 AM
BigChief BigChief is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salaryman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
pvp for it, RED 99
Both people on it?
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 10-01-2024, 11:10 AM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here's the thing: no agreement is going to make more goblins spawn. That's what you all really want, but since you can't make it happen you're trying to trick others into giving their chance at a goblin to you.

By definition, any system you propose will have winners and losers. By definition, half the people at the current roll will be losers if the system changes (... and in all honestly, I think some of the people who think they would be "winners" will actually be losers in the new system).

So you're welcome to try and get half the people at the agreements to vote against their own interests (and against classic EQ) ... but again, I don't think it's going to happen.
It's not really purely against their own interests though. It's reducing their chance now in order to guarantee a much higher chance later. I'm not doing Angry Goblin, but personally if I were I would view that as a much better trade off than just perpetually rolling.

People do this with the URN system for example. It's not like it's totally unheard of for there to be a player agreement that essentially awards you DKP for being at the camp.

Seems like a pretty fair system to me. And it's technically not unclassic if it's a player agreement since there were player agreements in classic (it would be unclassic if the staff just decided to create this system).
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 10-01-2024, 01:32 PM
Toxigen Toxigen is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,776
Default

the difference w/ drusella is that you need people to hold the camp for a long ass time

angry is a roll, sorry you dont got SWC
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 10-01-2024, 09:16 PM
PatChapp PatChapp is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 996
Default

I bought every piece of this quest

Skargus head mq,urn mq
Friend of mine mq a sinew for me

Imagine not just buying it all,what a nightmare.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 10-01-2024, 11:08 PM
Knuckle Knuckle is offline
Planar Protector

Knuckle's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,796
Send a message via AIM to Knuckle
Default

At this point im more amused at the thought of people being ANGRY their odds of winning the roll increase after each loss...Yeah no ones going to feel that way.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 10-02-2024, 02:46 AM
Duik Duik is offline
Planar Protector

Duik's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Near the largest canyon in the world!
Posts: 1,868
Default

All pvping for it would mean is that the people always getting it would shift.
Which ever guild/group of people that brings the boom wins.
Still a sweatfest.
Also red players would infect the pve servers with their special brand of entitlement. Sure pvping is a skill. But unless its IRL pvp it is only hollow elf points victories.

Pvp works for red. Lolocaust if 60 max pop is "working".
Also also, if ya wanna pvp on blue ya can book it or /duel.

Off ya pop ya dress wearing ranger.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 10-02-2024, 04:53 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Off ya pop ya dress wearing ranger.
My head canon it is a poncho or full cloak, cos what other long attire would be suitable for rangering? A robe would be just about as practical as high heels.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 10-13-2024, 01:03 AM
Knuckle Knuckle is offline
Planar Protector

Knuckle's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,796
Send a message via AIM to Knuckle
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My head canon it is a poncho or full cloak, cos what other long attire would be suitable for rangering? A robe would be just about as practical as high heels.
Maybe a desert ranger
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 10-13-2024, 03:31 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knuckle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Maybe a desert ranger
I like that. I love the vanilla art but they dropped the ball by not giving PC humans an option for a wizened grey bearded face. Woulda suited this build (and of courae gandalf/merlin clones).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:40 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.