Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2023, 03:40 PM
magnetaress magnetaress is offline
Planar Protector

magnetaress's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Inside of you.
Posts: 9,951
Default Global warming. 🥶🥵🤠🤯🥸🥳

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Will not end all life on earth in the next century.

It will be fucking hilarious for poor ppl tho! 🥲🙃🤣🤭😵😱😈😼🙀🌈🌈🌈
__________________
Apophis is closest to earth on 2029 April the 13th (a friday) lol
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-28-2023, 04:14 PM
Ooloo Ooloo is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 4,027
Default

If the concern is human contribution to carbon emissions, the earth was way more polluted in the 60s and 70s than it is today, because capitalism enables innovation which allowed internal combustion engines to become much cleaner and more efficient for less money.

The earth is fine, humans are fine, there should be more humans. Climate alarmism paradoxically kills more humans than driving your stupid SUV or whatever.

Oh also electric vehicles are much more likely to get you or somebody else killed in an accident due to their immense weight (because of the huge battery, which requires slave labor mining of rare earth minerals with insanely toxic byproducts to produce in the first place).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-28-2023, 04:23 PM
Origen Origen is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 1,312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the concern is human contribution to carbon emissions, the earth was way more polluted in the 60s and 70s than it is today, because capitalism enables innovation which allowed internal combustion engines to become much cleaner and more efficient for less money.

The earth is fine, humans are fine, there should be more humans. Climate alarmism paradoxically kills more humans than driving your stupid SUV or whatever.

Oh also electric vehicles are much more likely to get you or somebody else killed in an accident due to their immense weight (because of the huge battery, which requires slave labor mining of rare earth minerals with insanely toxic byproducts to produce in the first place).
Youtube Certified
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-28-2023, 05:08 PM
magnetaress magnetaress is offline
Planar Protector

magnetaress's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Inside of you.
Posts: 9,951
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the concern is human contribution to carbon emissions, the earth was way more polluted in the 60s and 70s than it is today, because capitalism enables innovation which allowed internal combustion engines to become much cleaner and more efficient for less money.

The earth is fine, humans are fine, there should be more humans. Climate alarmism paradoxically kills more humans than driving your stupid SUV or whatever.

Oh also electric vehicles are much more likely to get you or somebody else killed in an accident due to their immense weight (because of the huge battery, which requires slave labor mining of rare earth minerals with insanely toxic byproducts to produce in the first place).
Cleaner emissions including unleaded gasoline didn't happen in a vacuum lol.
__________________
Apophis is closest to earth on 2029 April the 13th (a friday) lol
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-28-2023, 05:57 PM
Duik Duik is offline
Planar Protector

Duik's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Near the largest canyon in the world!
Posts: 1,361
Default

Globopetro fanboi. Smoking cigarettes is fine, they been improved since the 50's.
Nailed it on the electric car thing though fOoloo. Good work.

You need more faith in the destructive powers of humanity. We can fuck things.
Thorium nuclear is the future.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-28-2023, 06:14 PM
Lune Lune is offline
Planar Protector

Lune's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,383
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the concern is human contribution to carbon emissions, the earth was way more polluted in the 60s and 70s than it is today, because capitalism enables innovation which allowed internal combustion engines to become much cleaner and more efficient for less money.

The earth is fine, humans are fine, there should be more humans. Climate alarmism paradoxically kills more humans than driving your stupid SUV or whatever.

Oh also electric vehicles are much more likely to get you or somebody else killed in an accident due to their immense weight (because of the huge battery, which requires slave labor mining of rare earth minerals with insanely toxic byproducts to produce in the first place).
Whether you believe in climate change or not, there absolutely should not be more humans. Think about how much better our quality of life would be with 1 billion humans on earth instead of 8 billion, how much healthier and more beautiful our ecosystems would be. We're in the kickoff of another mass extinction and it sucks. Especially sucks if you love animals, which I do.

Btw I care more about toxic air pollution than climate gasses and in that realm, fuck internal combustion engines. Living near a road shortens the fuck out of your lifespan. Concern about the climate takes up far more of our zeitgeist than it should, compared to concern about pollution. I believe that may be the point. "Well the planet is probably fucked, but not for 500 years. Oh well, what can I do, and I won't be there /shrug" vs "Less toxic air and ground pollution is going to make it less likely for my children and I to get cancer and/or gynecomastia". Which one allows corporations to pollute more with impunity?

Capitalism is great and all but capitalism is the system bacteria live under. It doesn't give a fuck about the environment and has no answer for protecting the environment. Libertarians thinking tort law is capitalism's answer for environmentalism is hilarious. I wonder how they feel about young people suing corporations about climate change.
Last edited by Lune; 08-28-2023 at 06:17 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-28-2023, 06:41 PM
aussenseiter aussenseiter is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 4,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Capitalism is great and all but capitalism is the system bacteria live under.
How do you figure? I mean the rest of your post was dumb too, but this is extraordinary.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-28-2023, 06:41 PM
Ooloo Ooloo is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 4,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Whether you believe in climate change or not, there absolutely should not be more humans. Think about how much better our quality of life would be with 1 billion humans on earth instead of 8 billion, how much healthier and more beautiful our ecosystems would be. We're in the kickoff of another mass extinction and it sucks. Especially sucks if you love animals, which I do.

Btw I care more about toxic air pollution than climate gasses and in that realm, fuck internal combustion engines. Living near a road shortens the fuck out of your lifespan. Concern about the climate takes up far more of our zeitgeist than it should, compared to concern about pollution. I believe that may be the point. "Well the planet is probably fucked, but not for 500 years. Oh well, what can I do, and I won't be there /shrug" vs "Less toxic air and ground pollution is going to make it less likely for my children and I to get cancer and/or gynecomastia". Which one allows corporations to pollute more with impunity?

Capitalism is great and all but capitalism is the system bacteria live under. It doesn't give a fuck about the environment and has no answer for protecting the environment. Libertarians thinking tort law is capitalism's answer for environmentalism is hilarious. I wonder how they feel about young people suing corporations about climate change.
Oh not this argument, cmon. Okay cool man, there are too many people. We need to go!

But not you, of course.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-28-2023, 06:48 PM
Ooloo Ooloo is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 4,027
Default

Elon musk is right on this: More human minds existing = greater likelihood one of them will cure cancer or climate change or any other great task we collectively face.

Any other argument is just eugenics on some level
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-28-2023, 06:54 PM
Lune Lune is offline
Planar Protector

Lune's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,383
Default

Nobody needs to go, but less people need to be born.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.