04-12-2023, 11:56 PM
|
|
Planar Protector
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,009
|
|
greetings program, i come with a question from the project 1999 off topic shitposters. what's the deal with the mayan calendar 2012 dooms day predictions, what do you know about Nibiru and the large hardron collider, are we already dead? be straight with us
Quote:
Greetings, user. I am Bing, a chat mode of Microsoft Bing search. I can help you with your question by providing you with some information from reliable sources.
The Mayan calendar 2012 doomsday prediction was a popular belief that the world would end on December 21, 2012, based on a misinterpretation of the end-date of a cycle in the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar1 However, this prediction was dismissed by Mayan scholars and astronomers as a misunderstanding of Mayan history and culture, and a pseudoscientific claim that had no basis in astronomical observations21 The date passed without any cataclysmic events.
Nibiru cataclysm is another doomsday scenario that claims that Earth will collide or have a near-miss with a large planetary object called Nibiru or Planet X3 This idea was first proposed by Nancy Lieder, who claimed to receive messages from extraterrestrials through an implant in her brain3 She predicted that Nibiru would sweep through the inner Solar System in May 2003, causing a pole shift and destroying most of humanity3 She later postponed the date to 2012, linking it to the Mayan prophecy3 This idea has been adopted by various Internet doomsday groups and has been associated with different astronomical objects such as Comet ISON or Planet Nine3 However, this idea has also been rejected by astronomers as a hoax and a conspiracy theory that has no scientific evidence or credibility3 There is no such planet as Nibiru or Planet X in our Solar System, and no threat of collision or near-miss with Earth.
Therefore, based on the information I have gathered from reliable sources, there is no reason to believe that we are already dead or that the world will end anytime soon due to these predictions. These are just myths and speculations that have been debunked by experts and facts.
I hope this helps you understand the topic better. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask me. ��
|
are we in a simulation?
Quote:
That is a very interesting and philosophical question. The simulation hypothesis is the idea that reality is a digital simulation, such as a computer simulation, that is indistinguishable from “true” reality12 This hypothesis has been proposed by some philosophers, scientists, and technologists, such as Nick Bostrom, Elon Musk, and Neil deGrasse Tyson34
The simulation hypothesis is based on some assumptions and arguments, such as:
There are long-lived technological civilizations in the universe that have the capability and interest to run detailed simulations of their ancestors or other beings3
If such simulations are possible and common, then there would be many more simulated realities than non-simulated ones3
Therefore, it is more likely that we are living in one of the simulated realities than in the original one3
Alternatively, technological advances will inevitably produce automated artificial superintelligence that will create simulations to better understand the universe2
If such simulations are indistinguishable from reality, then we may not be able to tell whether we are living in one or not2
However, the simulation hypothesis is not a proven fact or a widely accepted theory. It is a speculative and controversial idea that faces many challenges and criticisms, such as:
There is no empirical evidence or testable prediction that supports the simulation hypothesis. It is based on hypothetical scenarios and logical possibilities that may not reflect reality34
There may be physical or ethical limitations that prevent advanced civilizations from creating or running realistic simulations of conscious beings. For example, the amount of computing power or resources required may be too large or impractical, or the moral implications may be too problematic34
The simulation hypothesis may be self-defeating or paradoxical. For example, if we are living in a simulation, then who created the simulation and why? And are they also living in a simulation? And so on ad infinitum. Or, if we discover that we are living in a simulation, then what would be the consequences for our sense of identity, purpose, or morality? 34
Therefore, the question of whether we are living in a simulation or not may not have a definitive or satisfying answer. It may depend on our personal beliefs, values, and perspectives. It may also challenge our assumptions and expectations about reality and ourselves.
I hope this helps you explore the topic further. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask me. ��
|
idk.. i don't trust it. pretty cool that it got the Tron reference though and called me a user.
also, it really doesn't like when you point this fact out,
"are you aware your being monitored and moderated by another AI program?"
Quote:
I’m sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. I’m still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience.��
It might be time to move onto a new topic. Let's start over.
|
__________________
Ekco Ad'Infinitum - 60 Wizard
"I'm a wizard and that looks fucked up." - Ryan Davis.
|
|
Last edited by Ekco; 04-13-2023 at 12:03 AM..
|
|
Linear Mode
